Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
College outcomes
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEcnl is currently doing the best at giving the buyers what they want - D1 college soccer. Academy does it best on the boys side. It’s a business. As far as Title ix, plenty of full ride scholarships for athletic boys in football & basketball. Title ix doesn’t say each sport has to have the same number for both genders. Boys who want sports scholarships, usually go to the sports that have them more readily available for boys.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTravel dollars fuel the side hustle you describe. It's the ecosystem of a thankful grifter, if you are travelling to play the 'best' (wink.wink.nudge.nudge) then you better train like the best with for $75 an hour with me. This business plan is just another unintended consequence of title ix.
Few if any boys private train with these clowns in the local after age 14-15, mostly because the 15 year is better than the trainer and seriously what's the point. I can do this all on my own and don't need you babysitting me like you did when my parents paid for me as a gleeful 11 year old.
Talent, work ethic & ambition will always blaze it's own path or way.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou miss the point of the grift, though.
Travel dollars mainly go to the travel and hospitality industry--hotels, airlines, Hertz, chain restaurants in remote cities, etc.--not to clubs or leagues. (Although some shrewd coaches, like the girls coach at Jesuit who runs a travel agency on the side, have figured out how to cash in, and who knows what sort of corruption and kickbacks are involved in "stay and play" tournaments).
The big money, for the enterprising soccer bum, is in private training. If you can get eighteen rich kids on the team, each with a tiger mom/dad who thinks that with enough extra instruction Their Snowflake will be the one, than you're set! Bid them against each other. "Only three hours this week? Susie did five". Suggest that they're not "working hard enough". In the business, the rich parents who will spend $$$$$ for private lessons, to say nothing of things like TOVO training or Taihuichi Academy (I can think of quite a few kids I know of who go overseas to train--not pro academies who have signed them, but pay-to-play outfits that charge big money to pretend as though the kids in their program are all the next Messi) are known as "whales". And if you're a full-time coach, you ain't making any money off your share of club dues, it's the extras that allow one to have a decent income from youth soccer.
Travel DOES have the advantage of discouraging poors from joining the roster; kids who may eat and breathe soccer, but whose families can't afford private tutoring.
Title IX does distort the market somewhat on the girls' side, but whale hunting is equally prevalent on the boys side. The worst offenders can generally be identified as those clubs or coaches who routinely poor-mouth professional academies, and suggest that they, soccer bums holding training sessions in a public park, can do as well.
Rubin, the subject of another thread, spent several years at IMG Academy, which at the time was the top training facility in the US; Westside doesn't get all the credit for his development. In the past, when the path was club/HS -> college -> pros, local youth clubs were generally the drivers of high-level training (most HS soccer programs being rec-focused and with dinosaur coaches). But today, the pathway to the pros, and even to college for top players, frequently involves stops in pro academies; and there's no club in town that any objective pro or college scout will consider to be superior to the Timbers, even as mediocre as TA has been.
So the question remains why did this established club/college/mls pipeline not get fatter and more robust with the TA taking over around 2013?
Makes no sense--- unless the talent pool locally as well as the requisite coaching just evaporated from the Oregon landscape. Maybe that's the real answer. Since the MLS has grown from 12 teams in 2005 to 27 teams today. There should be a boat load more of Oregonians moving to the MLS pros given the over twofold growth of the MLS.
Maybe it's time to digest it's really been a horrible decade's worth of coaching and players locally--which cannot be argued or denied.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou miss the point of the grift, though.
Travel dollars mainly go to the travel and hospitality industry--hotels, airlines, Hertz, chain restaurants in remote cities, etc.--not to clubs or leagues. (Although some shrewd coaches, like the girls coach at Jesuit who runs a travel agency on the side, have figured out how to cash in, and who knows what sort of corruption and kickbacks are involved in "stay and play" tournaments).
The big money, for the enterprising soccer bum, is in private training. If you can get eighteen rich kids on the team, each with a tiger mom/dad who thinks that with enough extra instruction Their Snowflake will be the one, than you're set! Bid them against each other. "Only three hours this week? Susie did five". Suggest that they're not "working hard enough". In the business, the rich parents who will spend $$$$$ for private lessons, to say nothing of things like TOVO training or Taihuichi Academy (I can think of quite a few kids I know of who go overseas to train--not pro academies who have signed them, but pay-to-play outfits that charge big money to pretend as though the kids in their program are all the next Messi) are known as "whales". And if you're a full-time coach, you ain't making any money off your share of club dues, it's the extras that allow one to have a decent income from youth soccer.
Travel DOES have the advantage of discouraging poors from joining the roster; kids who may eat and breathe soccer, but whose families can't afford private tutoring.
Title IX does distort the market somewhat on the girls' side, but whale hunting is equally prevalent on the boys side. The worst offenders can generally be identified as those clubs or coaches who routinely poor-mouth professional academies, and suggest that they, soccer bums holding training sessions in a public park, can do as well.
Rubin, the subject of another thread, spent several years at IMG Academy, which at the time was the top training facility in the US; Westside doesn't get all the credit for his development. In the past, when the path was club/HS -> college -> pros, local youth clubs were generally the drivers of high-level training (most HS soccer programs being rec-focused and with dinosaur coaches). But today, the pathway to the pros, and even to college for top players, frequently involves stops in pro academies; and there's no club in town that any objective pro or college scout will consider to be superior to the Timbers, even as mediocre as TA has been.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou miss the point of the grift, though.
Travel dollars mainly go to the travel and hospitality industry--hotels, airlines, Hertz, chain restaurants in remote cities, etc.--not to clubs or leagues. (Although some shrewd coaches, like the girls coach at Jesuit who runs a travel agency on the side, have figured out how to cash in, and who knows what sort of corruption and kickbacks are involved in "stay and play" tournaments).
The big money, for the enterprising soccer bum, is in private training. If you can get eighteen rich kids on the team, each with a tiger mom/dad who thinks that with enough extra instruction Their Snowflake will be the one, than you're set! Bid them against each other. "Only three hours this week? Susie did five". Suggest that they're not "working hard enough". In the business, the rich parents who will spend $$$$$ for private lessons, to say nothing of things like TOVO training or Taihuichi Academy (I can think of quite a few kids I know of who go overseas to train--not pro academies who have signed them, but pay-to-play outfits that charge big money to pretend as though the kids in their program are all the next Messi) are known as "whales". And if you're a full-time coach, you ain't making any money off your share of club dues, it's the extras that allow one to have a decent income from youth soccer.
Travel DOES have the advantage of discouraging poors from joining the roster; kids who may eat and breathe soccer, but whose families can't afford private tutoring.
Title IX does distort the market somewhat on the girls' side, but whale hunting is equally prevalent on the boys side. The worst offenders can generally be identified as those clubs or coaches who routinely poor-mouth professional academies, and suggest that they, soccer bums holding training sessions in a public park, can do as well.
Rubin, the subject of another thread, spent several years at IMG Academy, which at the time was the top training facility in the US; Westside doesn't get all the credit for his development. In the past, when the path was club/HS -> college -> pros, local youth clubs were generally the drivers of high-level training (most HS soccer programs being rec-focused and with dinosaur coaches). But today, the pathway to the pros, and even to college for top players, frequently involves stops in pro academies; and there's no club in town that any objective pro or college scout will consider to be superior to the Timbers, even as mediocre as TA has been.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTravel dollars fuel the side hustle you describe. It's the ecosystem of a thankful grifter, if you are travelling to play the 'best' (wink.wink.nudge.nudge) then you better train like the best with for $75 an hour with me. This business plan is just another unintended consequence of title ix.
Few if any boys private train with these clowns in the local after age 14-15, mostly because the 15 year is better than the trainer and seriously what's the point. I can do this all on my own and don't need you babysitting me like you did when my parents paid for me as a gleeful 11 year old.
Talent, work ethic & ambition will always blaze it's own path or way.
- Quote
Comment
Comment