Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
University of portland article
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFound this in another forum and thought it was interesting regarding Oregon players
"Although it doesn't address "great" players, here is the list of states (and DC) with the numbers of women they had playing for the top 125 DI schools last year, in order of what the number means per capita youth. What you're seeding is State, absolute number of players, and per capita youth rank:"
Utah 97 1
Virginia 156 2
New Jersey 165 3
Oregon 60 4
Colorado 77 5
California 559 6
Washington 93 7
Maryland 78 8
Oklahoma 53 9
Michigan 116 10
Ohio 133 11
Illinois 146 12
Connecticut 37 13
Delaware 9 14
North Carolina 86 15
Missouri 53 16
Texas 251 17
Wisconsin 49 18
Nebraska 16 19
Massachusetts 49 20
Hawaii 10 21
Georgia 83 22
Pennsylvania 87 23
Indiana 48 24
Minnesota 37 25
Florida 115 26
Kansas 20 27
New Mexico 14 28
Rhode Island 6 29
New York 112 30
Arizona 40 31
New Hampshire 7 32
South Carolina 24 33
Tennessee 33 34
Nevada 14 35
Idaho 8 36
Kentucky 18 37
Iowa 12 38
Alaska 3 39
Vermont 2 40
Alabama 17 41
Maine 3 42
DC 1 43
Mississippi 7 44
Louisiana 9 45
West Virginia 3 46
Wyoming 1 47
Arkansas 4 48
South Dakota 1 49
North Dakota 0 50
Montana 0 51
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo if you take the 60 and divide by 4, it's 15 per year. There are probably a few 5th year players, so probably 13 per year. Take away a few for TA players (sorry ECNL biggots, but a few TA players will always go to top programs) and you have maybe 11-12. There are 18 ECNL travel players per team, so 36 and each team takes 22 to 28 players. So for those of you toward the end of the bench, you should probably just temper any dreams you have after making that ECNL roster, it's likely not going to work out at a top program. And even for those of you spending $10K a year as one of the top 18, the odds are low. So instead of dreaming about Loyola Marymount, you should be dreaming about Western Oregon, or maybe even Lewis and Clark.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo if you take the 60 and divide by 4, it's 15 per year. There are probably a few 5th year players, so probably 13 per year. Take away a few for TA players (sorry ECNL biggots, but a few TA players will always go to top programs) and you have maybe 11-12. There are 18 ECNL travel players per team, so 36 and each team takes 22 to 28 players. So for those of you toward the end of the bench, you should probably just temper any dreams you have after making that ECNL roster, it's likely not going to work out at a top program. And even for those of you spending $10K a year as one of the top 18, the odds are low. So instead of dreaming about Loyola Marymount, you should be dreaming about Western Oregon, or maybe even Lewis and Clark.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHow can TA players go to top colleges when TA clubs don't even have HS girls teams?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIf you take 60 and divide it by 20 you get 3. Probably 2 per year. Spending $10,000 per year or $800 per month for those odds you have a great chance of getting some really cool stuff.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSo if you take the 60 and divide by 4, it's 15 per year. There are probably a few 5th year players, so probably 13 per year. Take away a few for TA players (sorry ECNL biggots, but a few TA players will always go to top programs) and you have maybe 11-12. There are 18 ECNL travel players per team, so 36 and each team takes 22 to 28 players. So for those of you toward the end of the bench, you should probably just temper any dreams you have after making that ECNL roster, it's likely not going to work out at a top program. And even for those of you spending $10K a year as one of the top 18, the odds are low. So instead of dreaming about Loyola Marymount, you should be dreaming about Western Oregon, or maybe even Lewis and Clark.
60 grand??
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post60 players.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Guys! ECNL is only $60,000 per year if you include parents traveling to watch the games! Quit exaggerating!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOuch. That's not good for UP or FC Portland.
"But Smith's squad is hurting for recruits, aggression and confidence. The Pilots are now fueled by the best players at FC Portland, not the best of Canada or California.
This storied program is leaking nostalgia, not optimism, a disheartening turn."
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Comment