Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
High Girl's ranking - 6A
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAgreed! Should be a good game. I didn't think Sunset looked very good vs Westview. Lots of balls in the air and clearing out of the back. Neither team really ever had possession. I didn't see the Tualatin game but hopefully both teams try to play pretty soccer in the final.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI don't know if it was posted by an ONYX parent or a SSC parent, but it's laughable to think that some "rivalry" at the U15 age level will be a big part of this game. Whomever posted that should move to the back, shut up, and go get programs and coffee for the rest of the parents and pray that their team gets enough of a lead to allow their little freshman player to get 5 minutes on the field.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSunset was fortunate to have good refs calling the game so that the phantom handballs and flops in the box weren't called.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Full disclosure please
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI was hoping Westview would get a PK called against them so I could hear them whining about the "bad call" after they had benefited from three PK calls to even get there.
Against WL you cannot debate the second PK, a trip from behind. The first call was debatable, but if you are going to waive that one then surely you agree the foul that led to WL's only goal should not have been called, 'cuz it was as ticky tack as they come. So one goal given to *each* team by the refs.
WV did benefit from the handball in the box call against West Salem. But for argument's sake, let's say that refs should swallow the whistle for lightweight infractions in the box. Then again, you must certainly agree that WV's previous score (a beautifully executed corner kick/header) should not have been disallowed. I didn't actually see the foul as I was watching the ball. But I didn't see anyone on the ground either, so it couldn't have been too aggregious. So there you have it, the refs gave WV one goal, and took one away -- even steven.
Great defensive struggle with Sunset, won with a terrific goal. Best of luck to them in the finals!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOf course the losing teams are only going to point out the calls that favored WV. But let's be honest, there were also goal scoring calls that went against WV on this run.
Against WL you cannot debate the second PK, a trip from behind. The first call was debatable, but if you are going to waive that one then surely you agree the foul that led to WL's only goal should not have been called, 'cuz it was as ticky tack as they come. So one goal given to *each* team by the refs.
WV did benefit from the handball in the box call against West Salem. But for argument's sake, let's say that refs should swallow the whistle for lightweight infractions in the box. Then again, you must certainly agree that WV's previous score (a beautifully executed corner kick/header) should not have been disallowed. I didn't actually see the foul as I was watching the ball. But I didn't see anyone on the ground either, so it couldn't have been too aggregious. So there you have it, the refs gave WV one goal, and took one away -- even steven.
Great defensive struggle with Sunset, won with a terrific goal. Best of luck to them in the finals!
And to the Tualatin and Sunset teams, I hope that you don't lose on a call in the box in less it is very egregious. Teams should have to earn their goals, especially in the playoffs. Hopefully, these are the best refs for HS that are available and don't insert themselves into the outcome of the game.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe WL goal was scored on a corner. Perhaps you disagreed with who touched the ball before it went over the end line, but generally, those are pretty cut and dried. But glad to see you recognize that you won two games on questionable calls where the refs inserted themselves into the outcome of the game.
And to the Tualatin and Sunset teams, I hope that you don't lose on a call in the box in less it is very egregious. Teams should have to earn their goals, especially in the playoffs. Hopefully, these are the best refs for HS that are available and don't insert themselves into the outcome of the game.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Not sure which game you were watching
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe WL goal was scored on a corner. Perhaps you disagreed with who touched the ball before it went over the end line, but generally, those are pretty cut and dried. But glad to see you recognize that you won two games on questionable calls where the refs inserted themselves into the outcome of the game.
And to the Tualatin and Sunset teams, I hope that you don't lose on a call in the box in less it is very egregious. Teams should have to earn their goals, especially in the playoffs. Hopefully, these are the best refs for HS that are available and don't insert themselves into the outcome of the game.
But, if it makes you feel better, sure, we only won because of the refs.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe WL goal came as a result of a direct kick after a foul. It almost went directly in, but hit the cross bar, bounced back into the box, where a WL player finished it.
But, if it makes you feel better, sure, we only won because of the refs.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe WL goal came as a result of a direct kick after a foul. It almost went directly in, but hit the cross bar, bounced back into the box, where a WL player finished it.
But, if it makes you feel better, sure, we only won because of the refs.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Hmm
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOddly, when the refs don't make a call for you to get a PK, you don't win. Congrats to Sunset for winning. I'm happy for them and I'm sure they are thankful they didn't have questionable calls against them.
Oddly, when those high powered offenses don't come through, they don't win.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Congrats to WV buuuut
Congrats to WV for beating the paper Tigers and taking Sunset to the limit but you need a little perspective on the WL game. You got the majority of the calls the entire game until the WL assistant coach got the Yellow. Funny thing right after that card WL got the call you were getting the entire game. The direct kick from that foul almost went in and did hit the bottom of the cross bar and was cleaned up for the goal.
The last gift from the referee's was off a WL corner in the final 2 minutes that went off the top of the cross bar and was controlled on the far side by a WL player who was preparing to cross into the box when the AR ruled the ball out, though clearly the TOP OF THE BAR is not out. To be sure there is not way to say they would have scored but that call was made by the same AR who blew an off sides earlier call that DID TAKE A BALL OUT OF THE NET.
Yes WL's top scorer did have a chance to tie the game in the last 5 minutes but the shot was high so unlike WV the lions did have shots on goal in the flow of the game and simply didn't get the job done. But for any WV supporter to come here and say that they clearly were the better team when they didn't control the game or get off more than one header and one weak shot to the goalie is bogus.
You were LUCKY and had the benefit of the calls and should just admit the truth. You did make the best of that win and should be proud of the next two efforts but seriously admit you were LUCKY to beat the Lions.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCongrats to WV for beating the paper Tigers and taking Sunset to the limit but you need a little perspective on the WL game. You got the majority of the calls the entire game until the WL assistant coach got the Yellow. Funny thing right after that card WL got the call you were getting the entire game. The direct kick from that foul almost went in and did hit the bottom of the cross bar and was cleaned up for the goal.
The last gift from the referee's was off a WL corner in the final 2 minutes that went off the top of the cross bar and was controlled on the far side by a WL player who was preparing to cross into the box when the AR ruled the ball out, though clearly the TOP OF THE BAR is not out. To be sure there is not way to say they would have scored but that call was made by the same AR who blew an off sides earlier call that DID TAKE A BALL OUT OF THE NET.
Yes WL's top scorer did have a chance to tie the game in the last 5 minutes but the shot was high so unlike WV the lions did have shots on goal in the flow of the game and simply didn't get the job done. But for any WV supporter to come here and say that they clearly were the better team when they didn't control the game or get off more than one header and one weak shot to the goalie is bogus.
You were LUCKY and had the benefit of the calls and should just admit the truth. You did make the best of that win and should be proud of the next two efforts but seriously admit you were LUCKY to beat the Lions.
There's a of luck involved in soccer. Should not be a news flash
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
so lucky if you win and bad refs if you loose. many of these are the same refs that officiate the OYSA and OPL games....yet I never such strong critisim about those games.
- Quote
Comment
Comment