Originally posted by Guest
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Trump/DeSantis Ticket would be like if ECNL/GA merged
Collapse
X
-
Guest
- Quote
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Also it's worth mentioning the Mueller report included countless examples of inappropriate contact between the Russians and Trumpworld, both before (as early as the 1980's) and during 45's tenure as president. But no slam-dunk indictable smoking gun, so we were left with "not proven but not exonerated either". The right-wing propagandists that tell the trump-humpers what to think always choose to ignore that second part, LOL.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Hey trump-humper,
Why did trump take classified documents to Mar-a-Lago? Why did he have his lawyer say in writing that all docs were returned when they weren't? What was he going to do with them, when we all know he doesn't read?
Why is Rand Paul calling for the repeal of the espionage act ?
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostHey trump-humper,
Why did trump take classified documents to Mar-a-Lago? Why did he have his lawyer say in writing that all docs were returned when they weren't? What was he going to do with them, when we all know he doesn't read?
Why is Rand Paul calling for the repeal of the espionage act ?
As for RP and the espionage act, it has a long list of opponents. In a nutshell, it’s often used as a political weapon against rival. Here is some of what the opponents say:
“Over the years, press freedom advocates have grown concerned that administrations cherry pick what leaked information is deemed a threat to national security.
"Government officials leak classified information to the press all the time. That's how huge amounts of journalism happen," Lebovic said. "Most of it is let go and allowed to happen. Only the instances that really upset the government in power are the ones that are prosecuted."
Heidi Kitrosser, a law professor at Northwestern University, told NPR the danger with the act is that it's too vague and broad.
“The law does not explicitly define what "national defense" is or what information could threaten it, she added. Although the U.S. has since created a classification system, there is still a lot of room for interpretation.
“More concerning to Kitrosser, the law does not explicitly care about public interest or whether the leaker in question had good motives. That's why a broad spectrum of people can be under threat.”
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
So, you know what was taken from Mar-a-Lago? What were the documents? Please tell us because I haven't seen any news reports.
https://www.breitbart.com/news/fbi-t...om-mar-a-lago/
Originally posted by Guest View PostAs for RP and the espionage act, it has a long list of opponents. In a nutshell, it’s often used as a political weapon against rival. Here is some of what the opponents say:
“Over the years, press freedom advocates have grown concerned that administrations cherry pick what leaked information is deemed a threat to national security.
"Government officials leak classified information to the press all the time. That's how huge amounts of journalism happen," Lebovic said. "Most of it is let go and allowed to happen. Only the instances that really upset the government in power are the ones that are prosecuted."
Heidi Kitrosser, a law professor at Northwestern University, told NPR the danger with the act is that it's too vague and broad.
“The law does not explicitly define what "national defense" is or what information could threaten it, she added. Although the U.S. has since created a classification system, there is still a lot of room for interpretation.
“More concerning to Kitrosser, the law does not explicitly care about public interest or whether the leaker in question had good motives. That's why a broad spectrum of people can be under threat.”
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I assume you trust Breitbart as source, right? The FBI took four sets of top secret documents, three sets of secret documents and three sets of confidential documents:
https://www.breitbart.com/news/fbi-t...om-mar-a-lago/
Wait, so you're saying it's ok to take classified documents from properly accredited facilities in DC, and put them an unsecure basement in Mar-A-Lago where basically anybody could access them? I just want to be clear, because I can't believe you're actually that stupid
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Quick question…why did the FBI, who reviewed the contents of what was being stored at Mar-a-Lago back in June, tell Trump to add a lock to the storage area in his residence guarded by secret service agents? If these “classified” contents were such a threat to our national security, wouldn’t you think the FBI would’ve done something back in June? I wonder what changed?
Between that and the fingerprinting of all the classified records, certain people in trumpworld are sh1tting bricks right now.
For anybody not brainwashed by right-wing media, it's not hard to connect the dots. You're defending a traitorous POS who likely gave or sold national defense secrets to enemies of the United States of America. You should be ashamed to call yourself a patriot.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Maybe the authorities wanted to watch who went in and out of that storage area. They just subpoenaed 60 days of Mar-A-Lago surveillance recordings - the timing works out.
Between that and the fingerprinting of all the classified records, certain people in trumpworld are sh1tting bricks right now.
For anybody not brainwashed by right-wing media, it's not hard to connect the dots. You're defending a traitorous POS who likely gave or sold national defense secrets to enemies of the United States of America. You should be ashamed to call yourself a patriot.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Maybe, Maybe, Maybe…Every left wing conspiracy theory has been one big Maybe. 4 years ago you were so certain Trump was going to be led out of the White House in handcuffs. Remember those days? It’s blatantly obvious Libtards have extreme difficulty connecting dots. You couldn’t connect them for Russia, Ukraine, January 6th, Stormy, Flynn, or weather maps. How many for fûcking dots do you needs before any connections are made? The problem with the left is that “maybe” and “likely” aren’t facts. They’re your opinions which nobody gives a shît about. You should be ashamed to support a party that is willing the lie and fabricate evidence and the truth at all costs for political gain.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
LMAO! Come-on, really? They would throw Trump in prison for a hangnail if they could. The fact the Mueller Report was a complete bust and waste of time shows they never had anything on Trump. Schiff lied to u and said he had mountains of evidence and you bought it. You know Schiff, the same guy that embellished his rendition of the transcripts on national TV in order to promote another fake story. Not to mention it was HRC who paid for the fake research in the first place. And these are the folks you support? That explains it. So spare us the whole Trump is a bad guy BS. You need to look no further than your own corrupt party before casting stones.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Maybe, Maybe, Maybe…Every left wing conspiracy theory has been one big Maybe. 4 years ago you were so certain Trump was going to be led out of the White House in handcuffs. Remember those days? It’s blatantly obvious Libtards have extreme difficulty connecting dots. You couldn’t connect them for Russia, Ukraine, January 6th, Stormy, Flynn, or weather maps. How many for fûcking dots do you needs before any connections are made? The problem with the left is that “maybe” and “likely” aren’t facts. They’re your opinions which nobody gives a shît about. You should be ashamed to support a party that is willing the lie and fabricate evidence and the truth at all costs for political gain.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I have said it before, you can't fix stupid. You question how we believe what was proven as facts(you obviously did not actually read the Mueller Report or understand it) and yet you believe the fake news about HRC and funding the report/research(as you call it) is ironic and laughable. I read it before from another poster and they were 100% right, Maga followers are the dumbest people in the world right now and live in false fear and would gladly give up their freedom and the freedom of others just to have that fascist man back in the office. You are a joke and a very dangerous joke to all of our freedoms.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I find it amusing that people who follow Trump and are "Maga" think they are republicans when they are not. They never were, they just hijacked that particular party because there was a leadership void and the party could not prevent it. The MAGA is really more fascist-leaning and has more in common with North Korea and Russia/Soviet Union than American values. The poster was right, they are a very dangerous joke to the American people and the freedoms we have. God help our country from those people.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
The same party who continually promotes Russia propaganda . . .
Thanks for the laughs, you never fail to amuse.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostI spit out my morning coffee when I realized this was aimed at the left. The blatant projection and lack of self-awareness is comical. I hereby nominate this as "stupidest statement of the year".
Thanks for the laughs, you never fail to amuse.
- Quote
Comment
Comment