OCYS Consolidated Thread

[Unregistered]

I love the FKKtard. There is no 15 mile rule? It is mentioned throughout the board minutes as the main reason clubs are denied affiliation. Yet you say there is no rule. I just posted it in black and white. Are you saying the secretary of the FYSA board incorrectly quoted their own rules? Denial ain't a river in Africa moron. Seriously, get some help.

I'm sorry I can't stop laughing at "FKKtard" and the "denial" maybe the funniest thing ever on TS. Please keep posting it is so nice to laugh out loud, it makes me smile and feel good. Well done.

[Unregistered]

I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt but it's obvious you're complete dumbass. Just listen to yourself, it's not about a club objecting it's about gaining support from clubs that already exist in the 15 mile rule. If a club doesn't give you their support, it's obvious they have some kind of objection. All you are doing is playing the semantics game. I also find it convenient that you don't mention any of the other charges brought against FKK that were found to be untrue. I can tell from your schoolboy rant that HM is in your head. Despite all your insults FKK is not going anywhere. Oh I would also tread lightly about calling out other clubs for coaching I mean "recruiting". Do you object to this or am I just not gaining your support?

Both of you sound like idiots. You have been playing the semantics game also. You said the 15 mile rule wasn't a rule, but it clearly is. It is listed under the rules and bylaws, and FYSA refers to it as a rule in their minutes. The Coalition, which FKK is a member of, stated the 15 mile rule as one of their objections to OC starting the free soccer programs around Orlando. (So did the Coalition object, or did they not consent?)

The rule is in place. If an existing club objects/does not consent to a new club being formed, then FYSA can deny it. Arguing over whether the existing club is objecting/not consenting/not supporting is irrelavant and ignorant.

The rule is in place for a reason. It isn't wrong for a club to use it to keep another club from forming in its same general area. In this case, it is understandable that OCYS is used it. If you recall, OCYS acquired CFK and paid money as part of that process. Then a year later, the CFK people tried to form a club in the same area, using the same fields that OCYS had acquired through the merger.

[Unregistered]

Both of you sound like idiots. You have been playing the semantics game also. You said the 15 mile rule wasn't a rule, but it clearly is. It is listed under the rules and bylaws, and FYSA refers to it as a rule in their minutes. The Coalition, which FKK is a member of, stated the 15 mile rule as one of their objections to OC starting the free soccer programs around Orlando. (So did the Coalition object, or did they not consent?)

The rule is in place. If an existing club objects/does not consent to a new club being formed, then FYSA can deny it. Arguing over whether the existing club is objecting/not consenting/not supporting is irrelavant and ignorant.

The rule is in place for a reason. It isn't wrong for a club to use it to keep another club from forming in its same general area. In this case, it is understandable that OCYS is used it. If you recall, OCYS acquired CFK and paid money as part of that process. Then a year later, the CFK people tried to form a club in the same area, using the same fields that OCYS had acquired through the merger.

Not worth arguing, is it? FKK is established now and growing. Whether they get formal status or not does not matter- although I think they will.

[Unregistered]

Not worth arguing, is it? FKK is established now and growing. Whether they get formal status or not does not matter- although I think they will.

There shouldn't be anything to argue over. There rule is in place, and it is reasonable for OCYS to ask FYSA to enforce it. It isn't reasonable for FKK to imply that OCYS is doing something wrong for asking FYSA to enforce a rule.

[Unregistered]

There shouldn't be anything to argue over. There rule is in place, and it is reasonable for OCYS to ask FYSA to enforce it. It isn't reasonable for FKK to imply that OCYS is doing something wrong for asking FYSA to enforce a rule.

Fair enough Captain Ethical, but once again u guys only mention the 15 mile rule. What about all the slanderous attacks about poaching and other deceptive practices"? All were unfounded. Reasonable? As mentioned before, this is bigger than 15 miles and u know it. Keep playing the victim but the truth is out.

[Unregistered]

Fair enough Captain Ethical, but once again u guys only mention the 15 mile rule. What about all the slanderous attacks about poaching and other deceptive practices"? All were unfounded. Reasonable? As mentioned before, this is bigger than 15 miles and u know it. Keep playing the victim but the truth is out.

I don't really care one way or the other about this whole stupid feud, but I can tell you first hand that the poaching charges are not slanderous. I was one of the parents targeted, and not from OC. The fact that there were no ramifications over the poaching does not mean the charges were baseless, only that no one cared about poaching by a club without affiliation. I mean what was FYSA supposed to do, grant affiliation just so they could sanction them? I don't care about poaching regardless, it goes on all the time and I think the rule is ridiculous, but don't try to say it never happened.

[Unregistered]

Any accepted teams link yet?

[Unregistered]

I don't really care one way or the other about this whole stupid feud, but I can tell you first hand that the poaching charges are not slanderous. I was one of the parents targeted, and not from OC. The fact that there were no ramifications over the poaching does not mean the charges were baseless, only that no one cared about poaching by a club without affiliation. I mean what was FYSA supposed to do, grant affiliation just so they could sanction them? I don't care about poaching regardless, it goes on all the time and I think the rule is ridiculous, but don't try to say it never happened.

Unfounded doesn't mean it never happened. And yes poaching does occur all over central Florida.

[Unregistered]

Unfounded doesn't mean it never happened. And yes poaching does occur all over central Florida.

Agreed, I was only referring to the comment about the charges being "slanderous". That would imply that the poaching never happened and that OC was lying about it. That is absolutely untrue.

[Unregistered]

Orlando City, by far, are the biggest poachers in Central Florida.......

[Unregistered]

Orlando City, by far, are the biggest poachers in Central Florida.......

You are not very bright if you actually believe this. All clubs do this and they do it equally.

[Unregistered]

You are not very bright if you actually believe this. All clubs do this and they do it equally.

I took it as a compliment. I mean, if you're going to be the biggest you have to take the good with the bad. We've got more players, more parents, more coaches, it only makes sense that we would have more poaching.

[Unregistered]

Agreed, I was only referring to the comment about the charges being "slanderous". That would imply that the poaching never happened and that OC was lying about it. That is absolutely untrue.

FYSA disagrees with your opinion. Just like FYSA disagreed with FKK's interpretation of their 15 mile rule. It doesn't matter what you think. It only matters what FYSA thinks.

[Unregistered]

You are not very bright if you actually believe this. All clubs do this and they do it equally.

The biggest club in Orlando in everything BUT poaching? If you believe that you're a fool.

[Unregistered]

Unfounded doesn't mean it never happened. And yes poaching does occur all over central Florida.

Actually, "unfounded" does mean "it never happened".