Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2013 Girls HS Soccer
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDude. They played division 2 teams. Do you get it. Didn't they lose to barrington? Who by far had the worst Jv team in D1. Two of your top goal scorers on your varsity team. Didn't even make the Bayside teams that they tried out for. They will have a tough time scoring in D1. Playing against better competition instead of cones. They will be cellar dwellers with Prout, Barrington, Mt. Hope , Cumberland , and I'll even throw EWG in there. Graduation losses will bring them to the bottom half of D1 too.
EWG showed a team can move up and do well, but they also had a senior team with the state POY. If EWG finishes above 8th this year, I'll be the first here to apologize for underestimating, but agree with the above poster that it's hard for small schools to sustain, especially when the privates pick off, and it's a long season so an injury or two can really hurt a team, especially with poor coaches who don't know how to use the talent they have (see Prout, Portsmouth, NK).
It will be interesting to see MKM play at high school level.
The number of teams is always a dilemma for RI clubs; you hear the issues when Bayside added a 2d team at older age groups. The NEFC of the world, they have large enough area to mask if the team is really the 3rd/4th level; with a Bayside, the players 15-25 are generally pretty top players on their school team, but beyond that (and maybe even a 20) you are adding marginal school players just to make the 2d team so there is going to be issues with the 4-6 kids who are close to some of the kids on the 1st team.
But let's face it; youth soccer numbers are going down by u12 and above, both in terms of overall population decline and growth of other sports (Lax). The number of "premier" teams has gone up and SRI rules keep the marginal town teams afloat instead of encouraging consolidation so you expect quality in general to decline as well.
This is the results in a small state when a club becomes more of the primary income source for some and the state association rules are not about competition, but protecting artificial relics of the past (premier) and encouraging quantity over quality at the town level.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTough to compare, but Lincoln only beat Vets 1 to 0 and Vets was the cellar dweller of D1. I was there watching the JV tournament so saw NK, LaSalle, Portsmouth and SK in addition to Lincoln's final match. Clearly, Lincoln's opponent was not much of a match, but pretty sure any of those 4 D1 teams would have beaten Lincoln just based on the speed and skill I saw in those matches.
EWG showed a team can move up and do well, but they also had a senior team with the state POY. If EWG finishes above 8th this year, I'll be the first here to apologize for underestimating, but agree with the above poster that it's hard for small schools to sustain, especially when the privates pick off, and it's a long season so an injury or two can really hurt a team, especially with poor coaches who don't know how to use the talent they have (see Prout, Portsmouth, NK).
It will be interesting to see MKM play at high school level.
The number of teams is always a dilemma for RI clubs; you hear the issues when Bayside added a 2d team at older age groups. The NEFC of the world, they have large enough area to mask if the team is really the 3rd/4th level; with a Bayside, the players 15-25 are generally pretty top players on their school team, but beyond that (and maybe even a 20) you are adding marginal school players just to make the 2d team so there is going to be issues with the 4-6 kids who are close to some of the kids on the 1st team.
But let's face it; youth soccer numbers are going down by u12 and above, both in terms of overall population decline and growth of other sports (Lax). The number of "premier" teams has gone up and SRI rules keep the marginal town teams afloat instead of encouraging consolidation so you expect quality in general to decline as well.
This is the results in a small state when a club becomes more of the primary income source for some and the state association rules are not about competition, but protecting artificial relics of the past (premier) and encouraging quantity over quality at the town level.
Before you mock me, look at EWG. it shows that you don't need many premier players. One solid player can make differnece if well coached. Players from super liga supported that team I know because my daughter plays at south with some of them. Good plyaers abound in these clubs (SC, Ocean state, BGYSA) and look at EWG and burrillvile as an example of super liga making great strides at the HS level.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTough to compare, but Lincoln only beat Vets 1 to 0 and Vets was the cellar dweller of D1. I was there watching the JV tournament so saw NK, LaSalle, Portsmouth and SK in addition to Lincoln's final match. Clearly, Lincoln's opponent was not much of a match, but pretty sure any of those 4 D1 teams would have beaten Lincoln just based on the speed and skill I saw in those matches.
EWG showed a team can move up and do well, but they also had a senior team with the state POY. If EWG finishes above 8th this year, I'll be the first here to apologize for underestimating, but agree with the above poster that it's hard for small schools to sustain, especially when the privates pick off, and it's a long season so an injury or two can really hurt a team, especially with poor coaches who don't know how to use the talent they have (see Prout, Portsmouth, NK).
It will be interesting to see MKM play at high school level.
The number of teams is always a dilemma for RI clubs; you hear the issues when Bayside added a 2d team at older age groups. The NEFC of the world, they have large enough area to mask if the team is really the 3rd/4th level; with a Bayside, the players 15-25 are generally pretty top players on their school team, but beyond that (and maybe even a 20) you are adding marginal school players just to make the 2d team so there is going to be issues with the 4-6 kids who are close to some of the kids on the 1st team.
But let's face it; youth soccer numbers are going down by u12 and above, both in terms of overall population decline and growth of other sports (Lax). The number of "premier" teams has gone up and SRI rules keep the marginal town teams afloat instead of encouraging consolidation so you expect quality in general to decline as well.
This is the results in a small state when a club becomes more of the primary income source for some and the state association rules are not about competition, but protecting artificial relics of the past (premier) and encouraging quantity over quality at the town level.
If it's for fun, nothing wrong with that. Find a team where your kid will get plenty of playing time that doesn't put too much stress on family or money.
If it's a stepping stone to a college team, then it's a completely different story. Find the very best team with the very best coach your kid can make. Your kid will get better by playing with better players and playing against better teams. Plus, a real coach with college coaching experience makes all the difference in the world.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMKM will do well I'm sure but high school can be a tough game, so it may take some adjusting on her part and on the part of some of the other rising freshman that are playing not only on premier clubs but on clubs like south county and ocean state. They are good players and could hav an impact.
Before you mock me, look at EWG. it shows that you don't need many premier players. One solid player can make differnece if well coached. Players from super liga supported that team I know because my daughter plays at south with some of them. Good plyaers abound in these clubs (SC, Ocean state, BGYSA) and look at EWG and burrillvile as an example of super liga making great strides at the HS level.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMKM will do well I'm sure but high school can be a tough game, so it may take some adjusting on her part and on the part of some of the other rising freshman that are playing not only on premier clubs but on clubs like south county and ocean state. They are good players and could hav an impact.
Before you mock me, look at EWG. it shows that you don't need many premier players. One solid player can make differnece if well coached. Players from super liga supported that team I know because my daughter plays at south with some of them. Good plyaers abound in these clubs (SC, Ocean state, BGYSA) and look at EWG and burrillvile as an example of super liga making great strides at the HS level.
South is the exception to town programs. It is essentially a 2nd level premier club, similar to Lusitana. BGYSA is a true town program. By the age of U15, there are no premier level players in either gender playing for BGYSA. Sorry but it's true.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI watch NEFC south teams get beat by town teams week after week at Sherwood. Big time money grab! Kids on those teams can barely kick a ball and do not belong as premier players I don't care what state they are from.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNot talking about those SC crap teams. Talking about NEFC Elite and Premier teams. All ages have RI players that you have no clue about.
Also, I don't think anyone said anywhere that their GU14 SC United team is better than the top Bayside team, but they still play the same division and finished mid-pack. Still better than 95% of the other GU14 teams in MA and RI, so again not "horrible."
As for the SC teams losing to town teams indoors this winter, those are the B teams and definitely a money grab for the club.
Whether you like it or not you Bayside people will have to realize that NEFC parked themselves on RI borders for a reason, and over the next few years, you will see that they will continue to increase their market share of RI talent. Unlike you, I'm not putting Bayside down to make a point either, just pointing out that its a growing competitor and will continue to be so over the next few years. But if want to continue to whistle by the graveyard be my guest. I just call it like I see it.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhether you like it or not you Bayside people will have to realize that NEFC parked themselves on RI borders for a reason, and over the next few years, you will see that they will continue to increase their market share of RI talent. Unlike you, I'm not putting Bayside down to make a point either, just pointing out that its a growing competitor and will continue to be so over the next few years. But if want to continue to whistle by the graveyard be my guest. I just call it like I see it.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI see people keep calling the SC teams crap, but their U10, U12, U13 & U14 United girls teams are all playing in the highest divisions in their respective leagues, and were just placed in the top brackets at the NEFC pre-season warm-up tournament either along side of their Central United, Premier, and Elite teams, and above their MN, and South counterparts, so they are certainly not considered the bottom of the barrel by the NEFC mothership. Of course, we'll see how they do and if they were placed too high, but if I had a kid on those teams, I'd rather them play higher and challenge themselves than play lower and fish for points and trophies any day.
Also, I don't think anyone said anywhere that their GU14 SC United team is better than the top Bayside team, but they still play the same division and finished mid-pack. Still better than 95% of the other GU14 teams in MA and RI, so again not "horrible."
As for the SC teams losing to town teams indoors this winter, those are the B teams and definitely a money grab for the club.
Whether you like it or not you Bayside people will have to realize that NEFC parked themselves on RI borders for a reason, and over the next few years, you will see that they will continue to increase their market share of RI talent. Unlike you, I'm not putting Bayside down to make a point either, just pointing out that its a growing competitor and will continue to be so over the next few years. But if want to continue to whistle by the graveyard be my guest. I just call it like I see it.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI see people keep calling the SC teams crap, but their U10, U12, U13 & U14 United girls teams are all playing in the highest divisions in their respective leagues, and were just placed in the top brackets at the NEFC pre-season warm-up tournament either along side of their Central United, Premier, and Elite teams, and above their MN, and South counterparts, so they are certainly not considered the bottom of the barrel by the NEFC mothership. Of course, we'll see how they do and if they were placed too high, but if I had a kid on those teams, I'd rather them play higher and challenge themselves than play lower and fish for points and trophies any day.
Also, I don't think anyone said anywhere that their GU14 SC United team is better than the top Bayside team, but they still play the same division and finished mid-pack. Still better than 95% of the other GU14 teams in MA and RI, so again not "horrible."
As for the SC teams losing to town teams indoors this winter, those are the B teams and definitely a money grab for the club.
Whether you like it or not you Bayside people will have to realize that NEFC parked themselves on RI borders for a reason, and over the next few years, you will see that they will continue to increase their market share of RI talent. Unlike you, I'm not putting Bayside down to make a point either, just pointing out that its a growing competitor and will continue to be so over the next few years. But if want to continue to whistle by the graveyard be my guest. I just call it like I see it.
Another weakness of Bayside is their lack of coaches. Too few coaches coaching too many teams. It gets worse as the kids get older, too, which is when those college-bound players need greater attention from their coaches. NEFC coaches are not spread thin. Plus, NEFC elite and premier teams have exclusive coaches that only coach one team per season.
Last but not least, at NEFC, no parent-coaches anywhere near their top teams, just pro's with college experience. This is a huge value if your kid wants to play in college. The coaches are a tremendous source of contacts at college programs and already in the college soccer network. Not too many parent coaches can claim this.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou keep saying that they will keep getting their share of ri talent. In fact what they get is kids that don't make bayside teams. Or top mass. Teams for that matter. Talent is not the word I would use.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou keep saying that they will keep getting their share of ri talent. In fact what they get is kids that don't make bayside teams. Or top mass. Teams for that matter. Talent is not the word I would use.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou keep saying that they will keep getting their share of ri talent. In fact what they get is kids that don't make bayside teams. Or top mass. Teams for that matter. Talent is not the word I would use.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostPretty sure most of them didn't tryout for Bayside. Its not even on their radar over here on the East Bay right now. The top players all want to go to NEFC right now and again I don't have a dog in this fight, but I remember 3 years ago, all the top players wanted to go to Bayside and Bruno, and at least in the girls side they now all want to go to NEFC. I have no idea if the trend will hold in the next 3 years, but I can tell you without a doubt that is where they want to go and are going now.
- Quote
Comment
Comment