FC Bucks 2006 ECNL - Girls

[Unregistered]

Why would next year be less than this year? Did the school district tell you that? Did you even ask?

I'm messing with you people. I know nothing.

[Unregistered]

I'm messing with you people. I know nothing.

Here are the facts as they stand now

Current lease for the CRN turf is expired
At present FCB does not have a new lease for the North Turf signed
The Council Rock South turf is definitely not being built
As of this moment the only turf field that bucks has a lease for is Brynn Athyn which has been used for the boys.

Bucks needs two turf fields to deliver on the promises they are making of three practices a week

Let’s hope they find a turf field.

Nightmare scenario for the new DOC, an ECNL girls program with no signed contracts for turf fields.

[Unregistered]

Here are the facts as they stand now

Current lease for the CRN turf is expired
At present FCB does not have a new lease for the North Turf signed
The Council Rock South turf is definitely not being built
As of this moment the only turf field that bucks has a lease for is Brynn Athyn which has been used for the boys.

Bucks needs two turf fields to deliver on the promises they are making of three practices a week

Let’s hope they find a turf field.

Nightmare scenario for the new DOC, an ECNL girls program with no signed contracts for turf fields.

Again, the CRN turf field will be used by CRUSA/FC Bucks. Other field options are being explored.

[Unregistered]

Here are the facts as they stand now

Current lease for the CRN turf is expired
At present FCB does not have a new lease for the North Turf signed
The Council Rock South turf is definitely not being built
As of this moment the only turf field that bucks has a lease for is Brynn Athyn which has been used for the boys.

Bucks needs two turf fields to deliver on the promises they are making of three practices a week

Let’s hope they find a turf field.

Nightmare scenario for the new DOC, an ECNL girls program with no signed contracts for turf fields.

Did you speak to the new DOC? I did. Its all good. None of this is an issue. This is why only you are speaking on this. No one else cares because its not a concern anymore of parents that actually took the time and speak to people in charge.

[Unregistered]

Did you speak to the new DOC? I did. Its all good. None of this is an issue. This is why only you are speaking on this. No one else cares because its not a concern anymore of parents that actually took the time and speak to people in charge.

Look - the people in charge can tell you anything you want to hear - and they “told” me the same thing. The fact remains at the present time there is NO SIGNED LEASE for the north turf, and the south turf is not being built. Period. Exploring other options and telling people that FCB will be signing a lease with bucks does not make it a done deal. Time will tell....

[Unregistered]

Look - the people in charge can tell you anything you want to hear - and they “told” me the same thing. The fact remains at the present time there is NO SIGNED LEASE for the north turf, and the south turf is not being built. Period. Exploring other options and telling people that FCB will be signing a lease with bucks does not make it a done deal. Time will tell....

And FYI we all were also told the south turf was a done deal - guess what it wasn’t!

[Unregistered]

Look - the people in charge can tell you anything you want to hear - and they “told” me the same thing. The fact remains at the present time there is NO SIGNED LEASE for the north turf, and the south turf is not being built. Period. Exploring other options and telling people that FCB will be signing a lease with bucks does not make it a done deal. Time will tell....

The answer I got was more than sufficient. I am very happy with it. Its all good.

You can get yourself all upset if you like over this non-issue but most people are happy and moved on from this topic.

[Unregistered]

Did you speak to the new DOC? I did. Its all good. None of this is an issue. This is why only you are speaking on this. No one else cares because its not a concern anymore of parents that actually took the time and speak to people in charge.

Don’t worry about this guy. The club knows who this guy is and I’m sure the school district will know shortly as well if he keeps misrepresenting them too.

[Unregistered]

Don’t worry about this guy. The club knows who this guy is and I’m sure the school district will know shortly as well if he keeps misrepresenting them too.

the stuff about the school and there being no lease is all public info. you just need to go to the CRSD website.

[Unregistered]

Any new lease will likely be for weekends only and possibly severely restricted on weeknights. Weeknights will be primarily reserved for school activities - for two high schools. At most FC Bucks can expect 2 hours a week night, which is significantly less than what is has now.

This is what I mean by misrepresenting the school district. Is this on their website too or did you just make that up?

[Unregistered]

This is what I mean by misrepresenting the school district. Is this on their website too or did you just make that up?

Not the OP but pretty sure “likely” and “possibly” are not misrepresenting anything - more like supposition. My kid plays at Bucks (not 2006) and we live in the district. The south families are irate with the fact the turf was canceled and will be demanding equal access to the North turf. The south turf has been promised for 10 years and people are pissed - there was even a shirt designed saying something like the hawk will not forget. The poster is rightfully skeptical that FCB will not have as much access to the turf as it once did.

No one really knows but common sense will tell you FCB may not have as much turf time as it once did and has a potential problem with the lack of an agreement for a turf field, especially given the crazy guidelines the CDC came out with - which is another topic. Hopefully all works out, but I wouldn’t completely disregard what the poster is saying.

[Unregistered]

Fc bucks 2006 ecnl - girls

Not the OP but pretty sure “likely” and “possibly” are not misrepresenting anything - more like supposition. My kid plays at Bucks (not 2006) and we live in the district. The south families are irate with the fact the turf was canceled and will be demanding equal access to the North turf. The south turf has been promised for 10 years and people are pissed - there was even a shirt designed saying something like the hawk will not forget. The poster is rightfully skeptical that FCB will not have as much access to the turf as it once did.

No one really knows but common sense will tell you FCB may not have as much turf time as it once did and has a potential problem with the lack of an agreement for a turf field, especially given the crazy guidelines the CDC came out with - which is another topic. Hopefully all works out, but I wouldn’t completely disregard what the poster is saying.

FCB should have bought Trifecta they could have made improvements to the facilities but BB probably guaranteed FCB that the turf was being put in at south...so BB screwed FCB again....

[Unregistered]

FCB should have bought Trifecta they could have made improvements to the facilities but BB probably guaranteed FCB that the turf was being put in at south...so BB screwed FCB again....

shame on FCB if they listened to BB on this one

[Unregistered]

Fc bucks 2006 ecnl girls

shame on FCB if they listened to BB on this one

The quality puppet master

[Unregistered]

Not the OP but pretty sure “likely” and “possibly” are not misrepresenting anything - more like supposition. My kid plays at Bucks (not 2006) and we live in the district. The south families are irate with the fact the turf was canceled and will be demanding equal access to the North turf. The south turf has been promised for 10 years and people are pissed - there was even a shirt designed saying something like the hawk will not forget. The poster is rightfully skeptical that FCB will not have as much access to the turf as it once did.

No one really knows but common sense will tell you FCB may not have as much turf time as it once did and has a potential problem with the lack of an agreement for a turf field, especially given the crazy guidelines the CDC came out with - which is another topic. Hopefully all works out, but I wouldn’t completely disregard what the poster is saying.

Guess who designed the "Hawk Will Not Forget" logo - BB!! Anyhoo, FC Bucks has no contingency plan for turf space, beyond what they have always done - which is 4-5 teams each getting a sliver of turf to practice on, and teams training 1-2 times a week, not 3. This is why FC Bucks teams are perennially at the bottom of the pack when compared to its peers in ECNL who train more often and with more space.

This is a problem. Any FC Bucks parent should rightfully be concerned about this.