Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

San Diego Surf SC Welcomes New Affiliate, New York Surf SC

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Yeah, I didn't know about the team side of it. I found out about him through the grapevine. Every time my kid did one of his programs he always had a nice mix of talent near my son's age.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Yeah, I didn't know about the team side of it. I found out about him through the grapevine. Every time my kid did one of his programs he always had a nice mix of talent near my son's age.
      The only knocks on Danilo that I had heard about in the past is that he tends to concentrate on the better players, which isn't fair to the weaker ones that are spending the same money to train with him, and that he could be very expensive though his rates were always negotiable. The training itself was always top notch.

      Comment


        Larry seems really steamed about this. Called Surf a big corporation. Lol

        They are a small Delaware non-profit with no legal connection to SD but that's a secret. They license the name.

        He accused Barca and Valencia of licensing a name but its fine that Surf does that?

        Comment


          A couple of weeks ago I tried to question Surfs hiring of college coaches and the contact they have with High School students. NCAA has specific guidelines for juniors and seniors and wanted clarification. Never made the forum.

          Comment


            Barça is a rich parent from Dix Hills SC, Surf is a rich parent from Westchester SC.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              A couple of weeks ago I tried to question Surfs hiring of college coaches and the contact they have with High School students. NCAA has specific guidelines for juniors and seniors and wanted clarification. Never made the forum.
              Most club kids would play D3 which has no restriction to answer your question. D1 is largely foreign and USSDA.

              I doubt Surf or any local club would have an issue with that.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Most club kids would play D3 which has no restriction to answer your question. D1 is largely foreign and USSDA.

                I doubt Surf or any local club would have an issue with that.
                I wasn't questioning If Surf had an issue, It was more along the Lines if these D1 coaches working for Surf and having contact with the players. The NCAA has guidelines but as a poster brought up before they are a DE based Corp. Does the geographic limitations take place from there, Westchester, or the field they play on?

                Comment


                  NCAA Bylaw 13.11.2.3 In sports other than basketball, an institution’s coach may be involved as a participant, administrator or in instructional or coaching activities in the same sport for a local sports club or organization located in the institution’s home community, provided all prospects participating in said activities are legal residents of the area (within a 50-mile radius of the institution).

                  I would interpret that to mean that the institution's coach can be involved in programs located at the college campus or home community. If for example Surf has a coach from St Johns in Jamaica, Queens, are the participants subject to the 50 mile clause. Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Surf two counties over in Westchester not two communities over?

                  Comment


                    My guess by all of Larry's crying today that Surf doesn't have a legal leg to stand on. Larry of all people should understand contract law, his daughter is a lawyer.

                    Every employment contract has an out, could be a buy out or a simple notification. All commercial contracts typically have a confidentiality clause which has clearly been violated as Larry claims to have posted and referenced part of the contract.

                    Danilo will join Larry's wall of shame for trainers not paying him which always seems to lead to better circumstances for those shamed!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      My guess by all of Larry's crying today that Surf doesn't have a legal leg to stand on. Larry of all people should understand contract law, his daughter is a lawyer.

                      Every employment contract has an out, could be a buy out or a simple notification. All commercial contracts typically have a confidentiality clause which has clearly been violated as Larry claims to have posted and referenced part of the contract.

                      Danilo will join Larry's wall of shame for trainers not paying him which always seems to lead to better circumstances for those shamed!
                      Larry has written the last 3 comments and 6 of last nine. That's full spin mode people! Lol

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Larry seems really steamed about this. Called Surf a big corporation. Lol

                        They are a small Delaware non-profit with no legal connection to SD but that's a secret. They license the name.

                        He accused Barca and Valencia of licensing a name but its fine that Surf does that?
                        Almost all of LM's attack on Barca are perfectly applicable to Surf, if not more so to Surf.

                        Comment


                          Non compete clauses are rarely enforceable in most states. I work in an industry where 7 figure contracts are the norm and people move all the time despite these clauses. Judges almost never rule in favor of the former employer unless there is concrete evidence of the offending party conspiring to damage the aggrieved party.

                          If there was a chance of Surf succeeding legally we would not be seeing any of this. Instead public shaming is being used. That pretty much says it all as far as Surf's legal position.

                          Sounds like they get their PR advice from Trump.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Non compete clauses are rarely enforceable in most states. I work in an industry where 7 figure contracts are the norm and people move all the time despite these clauses. Judges almost never rule in favor of the former employer unless there is concrete evidence of the offending party conspiring to damage the aggrieved party.

                            If there was a chance of Surf succeeding legally we would not be seeing any of this. Instead public shaming is being used. That pretty much says it all as far as Surf's legal position.

                            Sounds like they get their PR advice from Trump.
                            Agree with you on the lack of enforcement of non competes. The fact that Surf leaked it to BOTN tells me Surf feels the same way. If they had an ironclad case we would have NEVER heard about this issue. As to your point they are putting a full court press on DV to force him into compliance. Only losing cases are litigated in the court of public opinion

                            Larry is getting played and can't or won't admit it. I can't wait to tell him I told him so

                            Comment


                              I had to go over and read some of it. So funny. Half of these club "alignments" and gigs are a handshake over a few beers. Non compete clause lmao. Not in this business - coaches leave clubs all the time and work right next door to their old clubs. This isn't a high level corporate employee who knows company secrets - they're coaches! Chances are the guy figured out Surf was a joke and bailed, wisely.

                              Comment


                                omg and LM is claiming to have copies of the contracts? He's really gone of the rails. Then a poster asked him to post the entire contract, and he said no that isn't permitted - but posting part of it is?

                                If anybody still thought he was impartial they cannot possibly think that now.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X