Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
https://cepr.harvard.edu/files/cepr/...t_synopsis.pdf
Basically says that closing of the bad schools and re-allocating those students to better schools had more to do with the improvement than the actual investment of the money. Admittedly, Zuckerberg's money did result in Newark teachers getting paid more, so that was good. But that amount of money should have resulted in a far greater and tangible transformation of the education system in Newark than it actually did.
Comment