Originally posted by Guest
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2011 Boys
Collapse
X
-
Guest
- Quote
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Wow, you must think MLS Next is the Champions League or the World Cup. U13, U12, whatever: players won't go from a strong team team to a weak team just because it is in a league that did not exist a couple of years ago and may not exist a couple of years from now. It will exist if it lets in the high performing clubs, so no need for players to leave those clubs and go to weaker ones to join MLS Next. In theory, the MLS youth academies want good competition, but as someone else pointed out in another post a while ago, they really don't. They are just looking to find the top kids that other clubs developed and they want to avoid losing at all costs to non-MLS academy clubs, which would be very embarrassing. They don't want competition at this age. If a kid is good enough to play for one of the very few MLS academies at U15 and beyond, then he has a shot at the pros. In the meantime, for a good player to movie to a weaker MLS Next club makes no sense and won't happen.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
[QUOTE=Guest;n4408058]
The Acela league table for the 2011 age group shows that some MLS Next teams are not that good, while some non-MLS Next teams are quite good. If MLS Next wants to survive it will ask the good teams to join and ask the weak teams to leave. Otherwise, it will be disbanded like all its predecessors. So there will be no "ghost towns". Players will not leave a strong team to go to a weak team just because it is in MLS Next.[/QUOTE
MLS Next is not asking any team to join if their club is not a part of the MLS Next system. They know that eventually if the kids in other leagues are talented enough, parents will move them to MLS Next Club. They don’t give a dam about a team playing in the Acela league. If this was the case both Union and Red Bulls would have thief u13 and 14 continue to compete in the league. You may not move your kid to a weaker MLS Next team but I guarantee you parents from that same team will. No good team stays together for ever and I have experience that. When the scouts come calling, try talking a parent out of leaving, especially when the scouts say your kid plays for FREE.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Pretty much you are saying players will stay on strong teams like Liverpool, Union, Bloomfield & FA Vs. going to an MLS academy? I have some news for you, at U12 some of the mentioned teams don’t exist anymore! The ones that are left are still strong! They been together for a long time (amazing loyalty) fast forward to U13, how will things look like then? Most of the top academies have 2 decent Pre MLS teams, competing towards creating 1 strong MLS team for U13. Some of the parents recognize the competition and will make the right move for their children.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
[QUOTE=Guest;n4408178]Originally posted by Guest View Post
The Acela league table for the 2011 age group shows that some MLS Next teams are not that good, while some non-MLS Next teams are quite good. If MLS Next wants to survive it will ask the good teams to join and ask the weak teams to leave. Otherwise, it will be disbanded like all its predecessors. So there will be no "ghost towns". Players will not leave a strong team to go to a weak team just because it is in MLS Next.[/QUOTE
MLS Next is not asking any team to join if their club is not a part of the MLS Next system. They know that eventually if the kids in other leagues are talented enough, parents will move them to MLS Next Club. They don’t give a dam about a team playing in the Acela league. If this was the case both Union and Red Bulls would have thief u13 and 14 continue to compete in the league. You may not move your kid to a weaker MLS Next team but I guarantee you parents from that same team will. No good team stays together for ever and I have experience that. When the scouts come calling, try talking a parent out of leaving, especially when the scouts say your kid plays for FREE.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
But all those teams will have 2 MLS Next teams, so assume each club will be 30 +/- roster spots for players, we are lucky in NJ we have a lot of good teams so there are roster spots. But a lot of the good kids from teams that don't have MLS Next teams will be moving to new clubs
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
There are only 5 MLS Next teams in NJ, other than RB: CSA Bergen, CSA Monmouth, PDA, Real NJ and TSF. That is not a lot. More are needed, which is why MLS Next needs to expand, which it is. I suppose they could deliberately reject other strong clubs so they can steal their players instead. But a business model that says we don't develop good players, we just wait for good players to come to us because we will keep the MLS door shut is pathetic and does not help grow the game.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Disagree that more are needed and will be added to MLS next. It’s already starting to be too crowded and diluted. In addition to the 3 local MLS teams (NYCFC, Red Bull and Union) there are the 5 NJ based MLS Next clubs you mentioned. Throw in the NY based MLS Next teams that are close to NJ. That is NYSC, FC Westchester, BW Gottschee, Met Oval and FA Euro. Also the PA based MLS Next club FC Delco. That’s 14 MLS and MLS Next clubs within a close proximity of each other. No more teams are needed/wanted.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
NJ is a densely populated state. No kid is going to drive two hours one way to go to Westchester, Queens or Philadelphia 3 times a week. MLS Next has been adding teams, as they should. If it's getting diluted, maybe some current teams need to be dropped.
this year they only added 8 teams.
https://www.mlssoccer.com/news/mls-n...2022-23-season
2 years ago they added 24 teams for their 2nd year.
https://www.mlssoccer.com/news/mls-n...21-2022-season
I would guess the number of teams added continues to decrease.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
NJ is a densely populated state. No kid is going to drive two hours one way to go to Westchester, Queens or Philadelphia 3 times a week.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
News flash, that’s already happening. There are 3 current 2011 Union players from NJ, and not just south Jersey. Two boys drive 2 hours each way 4x a week and the other one is closer to an hour. There are some others in the younger ages of the pre-academy too. Other kids come from quite far (1.5 hours plus) in other directions as well Soccer parents are psycho.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
it would be 4 times a week at u13 and older. There are currently many kids driving 90 min plus to play on MLS teams. The current teams aren’t getting dropped. This is not an area in need of more teams. Are there more deserving teams? Maybe, but that doesn’t really matter. Other areas of the country have much further travel currently and that’s why teams are needed and added.
this year they only added 8 teams.
https://www.mlssoccer.com/news/mls-n...2022-23-season
2 years ago they added 24 teams for their 2nd year.
https://www.mlssoccer.com/news/mls-n...21-2022-season
I would guess the number of teams added continues to decrease.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I feel sorry for those kids. Psycho indeed. School is not important for those families I guess.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
You need help man.. how is that related to school in any way? Is your child that far behind where they need 4 hours of school work a night after being in school all day?
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Thanks for the insult. I am sure your child is a genius and/or the next Messi and does not need school. For the rest of us who are less gifted than you, life is a bit different. Drive safely.
- Quote
Comment
Comment