Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GAL Mid Atlantic
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postagreed.. there are teams in ECNL that are below the level of some of those GAL teams, lets not kid ourselves... Each league has very good teams and some not so good.
They should move Bucks and Delco to GAL and move FCV and Oakwood to ECNL.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
GDA parent from another Region, and I've seen about 60-70% of these teams play over the last two years. My impression is the best of the best, MOST are in ECNL. Worst of the worst, likely the most are in GAL. There's a massive group in the middle that are within a goal of each other, which is really all you should be hoping for: games to be competitive. I have no desire to drive 4 hours to lose 6-0, nor win 6-0.
ECNL teams are generally deeper and better as you get into subbing. That could (COULD) change with the HS situation sorting itself out and some players now playing who didn't before, so that could improve.
But, if anyone really cares enough on "What league is better?" I'll say "ECNL" followed up by "Who gives a shlt?"
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Hahahahaha Agree. Very little difference between leagues and will likely become more balanced going forward.
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostGDA parent from another Region, and I've seen about 60-70% of these teams play over the last two years. My impression is the best of the best, MOST are in ECNL. Worst of the worst, likely the most are in GAL. There's a massive group in the middle that are within a goal of each other, which is really all you should be hoping for: games to be competitive. I have no desire to drive 4 hours to lose 6-0, nor win 6-0.
ECNL teams are generally deeper and better as you get into subbing. That could (COULD) change with the HS situation sorting itself out and some players now playing who didn't before, so that could improve.
But, if anyone really cares enough on "What league is better?" I'll say "ECNL" followed up by "Who gives a shlt?"
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
I guess the question is, is the quality difference between usys and GAL measurable, and if so is the extra travel worth the difference? To me, I'm not seeing the draw to join GAL over usys. Seems like the clubs not invited to ecnl scrambled to make something they could control (and profit from) instead of focusing on what made the da fail and giving a better product.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI guess the question is, is the quality difference between usys and GAL measurable, and if so is the extra travel worth the difference? To me, I'm not seeing the draw to join GAL over usys. Seems like the clubs not invited to ecnl scrambled to make something they could control (and profit from) instead of focusing on what made the da fail and giving a better product.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI guess the question is, is the quality difference between usys and GAL measurable, and if so is the extra travel worth the difference? To me, I'm not seeing the draw to join GAL over usys. Seems like the clubs not invited to ecnl scrambled to make something they could control (and profit from) instead of focusing on what made the da fail and giving a better product.
Mostly, the rest stayed the same. Pretty much same teams, conference structure, and likely the same showcase structure (but other ideas are in the works).
They took what they liked and kept it; took what they didn't and threw it away. Most of these clubs knew they weren't going to get into ECNL as they tried for several years and were rebuffed, so there wasn't much put into that.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI think you missed the entire point, based on your last sentence. Because, that is EXACTLY what they did. The two biggest complaints they heard was: No HS and no re-entry on subbing. So, they changed that rule.
Mostly, the rest stayed the same. Pretty much same teams, conference structure, and likely the same showcase structure (but other ideas are in the works).
They took what they liked and kept it; took what they didn't and threw it away. Most of these clubs knew they weren't going to get into ECNL as they tried for several years and were rebuffed, so there wasn't much put into that.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThose two issues were addressed, but making the travel more localized doesn't seem to have been. Also, wasn't there just an announcement by USYS that they were inviting all of those former DA teams into a special league? https://www.edpsoccer.com/news_article/show/1101687
The conferences are designed to operate within different Regions. I.e. NY/NJ teams will play each other more often than New England teams. They still will crossover, but there will be more games not requiring hotel stays. They also changed the goal to limit two games/weekend to also closer match customer requests. So, when you DO travel for an away game with some distance, you won't have to do it twice (albeit with a hotel stay in between, similar to ECNL).
(I'm a little more knowledgeable with the Northeast setup, so can't speak to how the Mid-Atlantic travel times are)
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostActually, it was addressed.
The conferences are designed to operate within different Regions. I.e. NY/NJ teams will play each other more often than New England teams. They still will crossover, but there will be more games not requiring hotel stays. They also changed the goal to limit two games/weekend to also closer match customer requests. So, when you DO travel for an away game with some distance, you won't have to do it twice (albeit with a hotel stay in between, similar to ECNL).
(I'm a little more knowledgeable with the Northeast setup, so can't speak to how the Mid-Atlantic travel times are)
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThat's interesting, but I guess from the outside in doesn't seem so. I guess my point is the mid-atlantic includes only 2 NJ teams (SJEB and CSA monmouth), 2 PA teams, a Maryland team, and then 3 Virginia teams. If you are from CSA, then the best travel time is (I guess) an hour and 15 min (best case) to either Philadelphia or Tuckahoe. If cross-conference games are common, then they could get more localized games (STA and the closer NY teams).
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThat's interesting, but I guess from the outside in doesn't seem so. I guess my point is the mid-atlantic includes only 2 NJ teams (SJEB and CSA monmouth), 2 PA teams, a Maryland team, and then 3 Virginia teams. If you are from CSA, then the best travel time is (I guess) an hour and 15 min (best case) to either Philadelphia or Tuckahoe. If cross-conference games are common, then they could get more localized games (STA and the closer NY teams).
I do think it's better, at least in our area it will be.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI guess the question is, is the quality difference between usys and GAL measurable, and if so is the extra travel worth the difference? To me, I'm not seeing the draw to join GAL over usys. Seems like the clubs not invited to ecnl scrambled to make something they could control (and profit from) instead of focusing on what made the da fail and giving a better product.
- Quote
Comment
Comment