Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

The Senate vote yesterday helped insure the Senate will be blue next year.

This impeachment was so partisan, you Dems already lost a member of your own party, Jeff Van Drew!

[Unregistered]

You mean the house managers that according to Alexander established that Trump did all that he was accused of? Those house managers?

Of course, that's how Dems a re spinning it, but what he actually said was:

"I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the U.S. Constitution’s high bar for an impeachable offense." - Lamar Alexander, January 30, 2020

https://twitter.com/SenAlexander/sta...7Ctwgr%5Etweet

[Unregistered]

Ruh-Roh

The 5 most recent Trump approval rating polls on RCP’s list don’t look so good Cons.
(I’m not counting Rasmussen’s 50% because everyone knows it’s a complete joke.)

Read and weep...
CBS 43 - 52
Economist 44 - 53
Reuter’s 41 - 56
Quinnipiac 43 - 52
Politico 41 - 55


That’s an average approval of 42.2

And over at 538 the last 5 polls (again, not counting the joke that is Rasmussen) average out to even less.

Good Luck!!

I guess when you cherry pick your numbers it is, but RCP average is 44.6 with a spread of -7.3 which is quite good for Trump considering he's in the midst of an impeachment trial. Overall his numbers are going in the right direction and little different than Obama's Job Approval at the same point in time of his presidency. Trump: 44.6, Obama: 45.

[Unregistered]

“Given the partisan nature of this impeachment from the very beginning and throughout, I have come to the conclusion that there will be no fair trial in the Senate. I don’t believe the continuation of this process will change anything. It is sad for me to admit that, as an institution, the Congress has failed,” said Murkowski, R-Alaska, a key moderate senator who has been closely watched on the witness question.

You forgot to include her comment that preceded this one. You also inserted in this comment something from a tweet that followed and yet, didn't include ALL of that tweet. So easy to look up too. Methinks you are the definition of INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY.

"I worked for a fair, honest, and transparent process, modeled after the Clinton trial, to provide ample time for both sides to present their cases, ask thoughtful questions, and determine whether we need more.

The House chose to send articles of impeachment that are rushed and flawed. I carefully considered the need for additional witnesses and documents, to cure the shortcomings of its process, but ultimately decided that I will vote against considering motions to subpoena."

It is sad for me to admit that, as an institution, the Congress has failed.

It has also become clear some of my colleagues intend to further politicize this process, and drag the Supreme Court into the fray, while attacking the Chief Justice."

Gee, I wonder who she was referring to in that last part? Hmmm, could it be that lyin' faux Indian from Harvard?

"I will not stand for nor support that effort. We have already degraded our institution for partisan political benefit, and I will not enable those who wish to pull down another.

We are sadly at a low point of division in this country."


https://twitter.com/lisamurkowski/st...7Ctwgr%5Etweet

[Unregistered]

We Deplorables may not be Ivy Leaguers, but we do know how to mark “X” on a ballot.

Didn’t go to well in 2018 did it? I guess those X’s you scrawled weren’t legible enough.
You can expect a repeat of 2018 in 2020.

[Unregistered]

huh, i was not kidding...democraps have thrown everything but the kitchen sink at TRUMP for over 3 years now....The Corona virus is certainly not beneath them....what else have democrats done for the american people in 3 years (other than bash/slander the POTUS)? anyone?

You're right about that. The libbies are clutching their pearls because Wilbur Ross said the coronavirus might bring back jobs to the US. It seems the thought that doing business with a country that has a long history of covering up risks to its own people, never mind the rest of the world, is incomprehensible to libs.

[Unregistered]

I guess when you cherry pick your numbers it is, but RCP average is 44.6 with a spread of -7.3 which is quite good for Trump considering he's in the midst of an impeachment trial. Overall his numbers are going in the right direction and little different than Obama's Job Approval at the same point in time of his presidency. Trump: 44.6, Obama: 45.

Nice try, but no cherry-picking involved. The 42% figure I provided is the average of the 5 most recent polls at RCP and shows the trend. Same for the 5 most recent polls at 538 that average to 40.8%

We know you want to include all the polls (including all those ridiculous 50% polls from Rasmussen) that go way back so you can say 44.6%. But the recent data says 40-42%.

Live with it.

[Unregistered]

Con. Big on polls... until he’s not. Big on trends... until he’s not.

[Unregistered]

Con Senators admit that Trump is guilty, but don’t like the prescribed punishment, so therefore won’t convict him of what they admit he’s guilty of.

[Unregistered]

Didn’t go to well in 2018 did it? I guess those X’s you scrawled weren’t legible enough.
You can expect a repeat of 2018 in 2020.

Didn't go so well during the 8 years of the Obama administration for Dems, did it. What makes you think 2018 wasn't just a blip on the screen? Hopeful thinking? Even Dems in some of the key states aren't too happy with the prospects of several Democrat candidates. Haven't you been paying attention? Nah, you are too stupid to consider only what the lib press feeds you. Things like:

"Clinton has 90 percent chance of winning"
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1322J1

"US officials: Info suggests Trump associates may have coordinated with Russians"
https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/22/polit...ans/index.html

[Unregistered]

Con Senators admit that Trump is guilty, but don’t like the prescribed punishment, so therefore won’t convict him of what they admit he’s guilty of.

Sure, whatever. They all said what Trump was guilty of was NOT an imprachable offense. Dems had the opportunity to address it and do what was right by the country through censure, but instead they decided to do what was right by the Democrat Party. Two can play at that game. Republicans won the game.

[Unregistered]

Nice try, but no cherry-picking involved. The 42% figure I provided is the average of the 5 most recent polls at RCP and shows the trend. Same for the 5 most recent polls at 538 that average to 40.8%

We know you want to include all the polls (including all those ridiculous 50% polls from Rasmussen) that go way back so you can say 44.6%. But the recent data says 40-42%.

Live with it.

If it's not cherry picking, then how do you explain RCP Average being so different? RCP used the SAME methodology in determining Obama's Job Approval. Using your logic, Obama's Job Approval must be a lot lower than it was.

[Unregistered]

Con. Big on polls... until he’s not. Big on trends... until he’s not.

Hey dopey, the trend on Trump is his numbers are going up. Take a look at the graphics at RCP. This despite impeachment and all the negative press he receives. How do you explain it? How could it be that a president who receives 95% negative press compared to Obama's 20% could possible poll the same in Job Approval? You can't or you won't?

[Unregistered]

Dems are facing in this election exactly what Republican elite faced in 2016.

Rashida Tlaib boos Hillary Clinton at Bernie Sanders event in Iowa
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ras...-event-in-iowa

Hillary Clinton says Bernie Sanders didn't do enough to unite Democrats in 2016
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hil...ocrats-in-2016

[Unregistered]

If it's not cherry picking, then how do you explain RCP Average being so different? RCP used the SAME methodology in determining Obama's Job Approval. Using your logic, Obama's Job Approval must be a lot lower than it was.

What the phuck are you talking about? RCP average being so different from what?
Please try to make sense.

Let me explain the basics. Again.

RCP and 538 are poll aggregators.

The average of the 5 most recent polls listed by RCP is 42.2

The average of the 5 most recent polls listed by 538 is 40.8

There are 2 polls in common between the 5 most recent polls listed by RCP and the 5 most recent polls listed by 538. That explains the difference between 42.2 and 40.8, if that is what you are clumsily questioning.

Anyway, a 41-42 approval is pretty piss poor for a president during a strong economy.

Tick tick tick tock