Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Different poster here

    I get it....you subscribe to the “Star Defense” presented yesterday.

    The founders intended impeachment to stop consensual oral sex. Treason gets a pass. Oral sax gets impeachment.

    You cons are hilarious
    Or the Bondi defense about calling out others' alleged corruption. She was forced to resign as the Florida attorney general because she took an illegal $25k contribution from Trump. Caught for corruption like many of the Trumpkins.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      As mentioned, this is about impeachment and the viability of the charges being impeachable offenses. Which they are not.

      So, you vote him out.

      Why are you so worried?
      Just want to make sure that you are saying that you are ok with this blueprint for future presidents:

      cheat in the elections during the third year of your first term while abusing your power, don't provide any evidence about your misconduct and force congress to fight you in court about witnesses and evidence until the election is over, and then tell everyone that the people have spoken and really didn't care, because they voted you back in.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        I see some riots come the convention if Sanders gets screwed again from those tolerant, peace loving lefties.

        Sanders allies in new uproar over DNC convention appointments
        https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...n-appointments
        I see the Republican Party taking mantle of “impeached President “ from dem shoulders , where it has been for 20 yrs, and placing it on their shoulders where it will reside for the NEXT Generation .

        Example ....

        IF Trump is

        1) still around
        2) overcomes his fear of debating Dems


        How do you think he will react to his accusers being seated in hall?

        All 4 dozen ....

        😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
        😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

        Dershowitz and Star ....remind me ....defended another accused rapist didn’t they ?

        😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
        😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

        The gifts will keep coming

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Just want to make sure that you are saying that you are ok with this blueprint for future presidents:

          cheat in the elections during the third year of your first term while abusing your power, don't provide any evidence about your misconduct and force congress to fight you in court about witnesses and evidence until the election is over, and then tell everyone that the people have spoken and really didn't care, because they voted you back in.
          Assume you are OK with the following blueprint as well:

          Disregard a vast area of the country, insult 24% of the country, lose the election, blame upwards of 80-different entitities, make false claims, work against the winner person vs. with them, and when all else fails try to have them removed for an unconstitutional reason over the fear of losing again.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Just want to make sure that you are saying that you are ok with this blueprint for future presidents:

            cheat in the elections during the third year of your first term while abusing your power, don't provide any evidence about your misconduct and force congress to fight you in court about witnesses and evidence until the election is over, and then tell everyone that the people have spoken and really didn't care, because they voted you back in.
            Oh I can answer that ....

            They went NUTS about the notion that their campaign may have been investigated by our own law enforcement agencies ....

            To the cons that is improper , even thought courts have found time and time again investigations were properly predicated

            So let’s say Obama “ordered” that . Hypothetically

            Cons say that’s wrong but it ok for trump to get Ukraine to investigate a candidate

            😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

            Sorry - for that to fly you are already a lickspittle

            😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂


            Campaign trail gonna be lit. I don’t think you lickspittles are ready

            Comment


              I wonder if Con will be posting more poll results that he has altered, like he did yesterday?

              Comment


                Remind me ....

                Ken Star and Alan Dershowitz .....both Jeff Epstein lawyers , correct ?

                Interesting who Trump gets to “defend” him ....

                Further, didn’t Starr get run out of Baylor for looking other way as athletes majored in rape rather than academics ?

                Hasn’t Dersh defended many high profile murdered and criminals that were guilty as sin? Klaus von Bulow....OJ....

                Keep digging ....I just saw huckabeee defending trump ....the guy who used his governorship to protect his son who got his rocks off hanging dogs .....

                Keep showing your true selves cons?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  I wonder if Con will be posting more poll results that he has altered, like he did yesterday?
                  Lying is like breathing for him

                  Comment


                    Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    I wonder if Con will be posting more poll results that he has altered, like he did yesterday?
                    You definitely will I'm sure...please show us the poll of any of the democrats running has a chance to beat TRUMP 1v1 in November?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Remind me ....

                      Ken Star and Alan Dershowitz .....both Jeff Epstein lawyers , correct ?

                      Interesting who Trump gets to “defend” him ....

                      Further, didn’t Starr get run out of Baylor for looking other way as athletes majored in rape rather than academics ?

                      Hasn’t Dersh defended many high profile murdered and criminals that were guilty as sin? Klaus von Bulow....OJ....

                      Keep digging ....I just saw huckabeee defending trump ....the guy who used his governorship to protect his son who got his rocks off hanging dogs .....

                      Keep showing your true selves cons?
                      Yes to all of the above. Another of his lawyers had to resign after it was shown she dropped a case against Trump U following a nice donation from Trump to her election campaign. Quite the legal crew he's got.

                      Sukolow and several other of his lawyers are being paid by the RNC, not Trump. Are all those donors happy that their $100 donations are paying the legal funds of someone who claims to be a billionaire?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Lying is like breathing for him
                        Just like his idol Trump. It's part of his DNA. It's the only way he could keep up with over 5,000 lies a year.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Different poster here

                          I get it....you subscribe to the “Star Defense” presented yesterday.

                          The founders intended impeachment to stop consensual oral sex. Treason gets a pass. Oral sax gets impeachment.

                          You cons are hilarious
                          You forgot perjury! But you knew that. Lying under oath is a felony.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Remind me ....

                            Ken Star and Alan Dershowitz .....both Jeff Epstein lawyers , correct ?

                            Interesting who Trump gets to “defend” him ....

                            Further, didn’t Starr get run out of Baylor for looking other way as athletes majored in rape rather than academics ?

                            Hasn’t Dersh defended many high profile murdered and criminals that were guilty as sin? Klaus von Bulow....OJ....

                            Keep digging ....I just saw huckabeee defending trump ....the guy who used his governorship to protect his son who got his rocks off hanging dogs .....

                            Keep showing your true selves cons?
                            SNL cold opener. So good

                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c5neBXQwf8

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Remind me ....

                              Ken Star and Alan Dershowitz .....both Jeff Epstein lawyers , correct ?

                              Interesting who Trump gets to “defend” him ....

                              Further, didn’t Starr get run out of Baylor for looking other way as athletes majored in rape rather than academics ?

                              Hasn’t Dersh defended many high profile murdered and criminals that were guilty as sin? Klaus von Bulow....OJ....

                              Keep digging ....I just saw huckabeee defending trump ....the guy who used his governorship to protect his son who got his rocks off hanging dogs .....

                              Keep showing your true selves cons?
                              So, wait, are you saying that you shouldn't be afforded representation if you are guilty? Just...I think you are guilty so you shouldn't defend them to ensure their rights are properly protected.

                              There you go, that sums it up quite nicely. "I think you are guilty so you don't deserve to be represented" says the dictator.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                So, wait, are you saying that you shouldn't be afforded representation if you are guilty? Just...I think you are guilty so you shouldn't defend them to ensure their rights are properly protected.

                                There you go, that sums it up quite nicely. "I think you are guilty so you don't deserve to be represented" says the dictator.
                                I love how fvcknuts tries to deflect from the argument and tries to turn it into some moral character qualification.

                                This from a group of posters who asked to have our wives and daughters sent over to him so he could have his way with them; even going so far as to brag that these daughters will have the best sex of their lives.

                                #liberalhypocrisy

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X