Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

So Fox's own polling doesn't count either? The poll that showed half the country think he broke the law and should be impeached? You cons love polls when they work for you, but anything else is fake news.

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-...chment-2019-12

Who is cherry picking their poll numbers???

Economist/YouGov No +1
NPR/PBS/Marist Tie
Quinnipiac No +2
IBD/TIPP No +3
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl Tie
CNN No +3
ABC News/Wash Post Tie

[Unregistered]

he's donald trump's worst nightmare.

He's out there saving the country.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veqb...ecosdyjt6wtsae

lol!!!

[Unregistered]

I understand now. Since Trump was investigating this alleged corruption, I am sure he has a mountain of evidence that he has gathered on this topic that he will share with the american public.

I believe Giuliani says he's willing to testify and present documentation. Do you think Dems will call his bluff?

[Unregistered]

Paul Callan, CNN legal analyst:

House Democrats on Tuesday tried to toss some new meat into the Ukrainian stew that is the heart of the impeachment case against President Donald Trump. House Intelligence Committee investigators are scouring through a trove of documents supplied by Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

Against the backdrop of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signing articles of impeachment Wednesday, these revelations may seem like powerful new evidence -- they make interesting reading -- but are unlikely to advance the case against the President in any meaningful way. In fact, they are a sign of weakness on the part of the Democrats.

While none of the information adds any new "high crimes and misdemeanors" to the menu of charges against the President, it does flesh out the details of Giuliani's travels through the dark corridors of the Ukrainian criminal justice bureaucracy, apparently on Trump's behalf.

In a letter to Zelensky, Giuliani asserted that he acts with "with the President's knowledge and consent" and then requested a meeting. The meeting never happened.

Pretty much all of the newly revealed material merely provides a dash of sleazy corroboration of information previously disclosed in the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committee hearings. It also hits the table a little late in the game and that's after Pelosi's stalling tactics.

If this were a criminal trial, such evidence would be theoretically admissible if relevant to the charges being tried. Most of the new material passes that test but it fails another. Republican senators will seek to block admission of the documents submitted just a week before the impeachment trial on the grounds that the late submission was deliberate and is prejudicial and unfair to the President.

If Chief Justice John Roberts were to rule against the Republicans, they have the power to overrule him by majority vote. The impeachment trial is a strange place, where the Senate is a jury that has the right to overrule the judge, even on questions of law.

Why does all this show Democrats' weakness in their impeachment case? In high-profile criminal cases, prosecutors are usually well-prepared far in advance of the commencement of a complex trial. Their evidence has been fully vetted in the investigatory process and in motion practice before the court.

In the Trump impeachment, a hasty investigation and presentation of evidence to the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees was terminated before court rulings could have affirmed the legitimacy of congressional subpoena power. Instead, the House rushed its investigation and compounded the problem by stalling the transfer of the articles of impeachment to the Senate. The stall time could have been used to test the subpoenas in court and possibly develop a stronger obstruction case.

It's too late for that now and Pelosi is unlikely to get any rave reviews for the thin Ukrainian stew her House managers' case will serve to the Senate in the days ahead.

Pelosi & company F'd up BIG time.

[Unregistered]

I have given this some deep thought and think it presents a fantastic opportunity for democrats. Think about it. Trump will try to use Hunter's corruption against Biden. In response Biden will roll out the info on the corruption of Ivanka, Little Don, Eric and Jared. There is a boat load of corruption going on there that everyone just brushes aside because that corruption has now been normalized. I think this would bite the repubs in the ass and they know it. Sort of like trying to call Schiff. Can you imagine if Nunes is called as well?

I suspect this is why the repubs will never have enough votes to get witnesses and evidence for the american people. It's really not a fair trade when it comes to witnesses because the repubs lose big either way.

Beside the fact Biden can't call any witnesses during the impeachment trial, that's already been tried in the media and failed.

Let's face it, Dems have screwed themselves. You might as well just admit.

[Unregistered]

Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz join Trump’s impeachment defense team

[Unregistered]

“I’m not for impeachment … Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.” - Nancy Pelosi, Mar 11, 2019

[Unregistered]

What a hoot!!!

Our pro-impeachment media are investing as much moral authority in Pelosi's putsch as they can muster. During live coverage of the vote on Dec. 18, MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell gushed over Pelosi's black outfit. "She's certainly always well-appointed, beautifully arrayed, if you will," she said. "She's wearing black today. And that is a symbolic expression of how somberly they are taking this." Chris Matthews added: "It's sacramental. ... It's sacramental."

Sacramental? Matthews returned to this ridiculous concept on Jan. 15 when the House Democrats made a dramatic show for the cameras by marching their articles of impeachment to the Senate. Matthews told Chuck Todd: "There's a sacramental quality to this. There's a ritual."

MSNBC reporter Garrett Haake affirmed this, adding: "I'm so glad Chris used the word 'ritual' because that's the word that has been stuck in my head about this all day today. It's beyond formality. ... There is something almost religious to it."

A few minutes later, Matthews suggested, "there's an excommunication aspect to this thing." Todd replied: "you are really taking this Catholic metaphor and going at it! Run, Chris, run!" Matthews then added, "the Lincoln Memorial is basically a church."

As Speaker Pelosi was shown on screen about to sign the impeachment articles, Matthews returned to churchy metaphors, and things were getting truly wacky. He said: "Well, there's a sacramental statement for life -- like a priest for life. It's a perfect statement of what she is. I think she is very reverential. I mean, she's one tough politician, but she's got another part of her, which is very respectful of hierarchy, in terms of who -- true moral authority. The Democratic elected officials have true moral authority to run the country."

[Unregistered]

Dopey, the poster was calling YOU a misogynist.

And as we have seen by the number of liberals with sexual harassment suits against them, especially among the media type, the name calling is a good fit.

liberals = hypocrites

Cons are so slow.

Yes, he called me a misogynist because he thought the misogynistic comment “grab ‘em by the pussy” must have sent a tingle up my leg. For educated folks 1+1=2. For Cons? Who knows. Lol

[Unregistered]

The Democratic National Committee is worried about Bernie Sanders. All those attacks on Wall Street offend donors.... Consider that four years ago, Democrats rigged the primary for Hillary Clinton. They did that despite the fact Hillary Clinton probably would have won anyway. But they just couldn't resist cheating. Because they did that -- because they cheated -- millions of Democratic voters emerged from the process embittered and enraged. Some of them stayed home that November. The net effect of this: Democrats lost. They suffered a shocking upset on Election Day. Could that happen again? Obviously, it could. But no one in Washington knows that because no one in Washington ever learns anything.

[Unregistered]

Cons are so slow.

Yes, he called me a misogynist because he thought the misogynistic comment “grab ‘em by the pussy” must have sent a tingle up my leg. For educated folks 1+1=2. For Cons? Who knows. Lol

Did it cause a tingle up your leg to post those words again?

[Unregistered]

"You know one clear way to demonstrate that you believe a woman can and should be president? Don’t try to defeat a woman running for President." - advice from Matthew Dowd, Chief Political Analyst, ABC News to Bernie Sanders

Are these people in the media serious???????

[Unregistered]

Did it cause a tingle up your leg to post those words again?

You’re the one who first posted about tingles up legs. Project much?

[Unregistered]

CNN's Jake Tapper says Lev Parnas has a "serious credibility problem" and calls out Democrats for believing his story and acting like Parnas is second coming of Roosevelt.

“We can’t ignore Parnas has a serious credibility problem. He’s under indictment for campaign finance charges. The foreign minister of Ukraine told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour that he doesn’t trust a word Parnas is saying. And yet I see people out there on social media — Democrats — acting as if this guy is the second coming of Theodore Roosevelt or something.”

[Unregistered]

You’re the one who first posted about tingles up legs. Project much?

Bwahahaha!

What a dopey response.