Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

LMAO...Ideas? and/or unobtainable wish lists are nothing more than Political BUllsh_t used for fake propoganda to sucker the american people to put career politicians in power to run and control the american way of life, its all BullSH_T.

Below is a speech by Malcom X and his feelings about white liberals and how they are not to be trusted, "liberals use negros as political footballs" circa 1963.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7YmjWW9tx4

Malcolm X was assassinated by White Liberal for being ahead of his time.
White Liberals have always been the true racists...sorry...lets not let history repeat itself.

That’s BEFORE Dems went in but for civil rights under LBJ and the GOP flipping the racist script with Nixon’s southern strategy. Why my working class family were republicans back then even though fans of FDR.

So conceded. Dems were the more racist party over half a century ago.

Republicans have owned it since .

The new George Wallace - trump - is a Republican after all

[Unregistered]

Ha Ha Ha Ha

" It’s a REFERENDUM on Trump. Period "


Ha Ha Ha Ha

“CNN flounders now, they’ve no idea what the best anti-Trump message is, given the total meltdown of the Russia narrative, post-Mueller,” a CNN employee said on the condition of anonymity. “My internal read is honestly that they’re in despair. They so believed in a Mueller smoking gun. I think they’re slowly realizing that Trump wins again, and they almost can’t fathom that outcome.”

Conservative strategist Chris Barron said that CNN’s decision not to ask about the Mueller probe “speaks volumes about how little political currency Mueller or the Russia hoax has even among Democratic partisans” at this point.

“It is fascinating that Mueller, who Democrats have spent two years making the centerpiece of their efforts to undermine the President, was conspicuously missing from last night’s debate,” Barron said.

[Unregistered]

How's it going so far ?

Electors didn't change their vote.

Not established. Senate intelligence said they could
Have . How do we know? Can you prove it ?

Lawsuits didn't remove him.

Show me a lawsuit that had anything close to “removal “ as a remedy , numbskull

Courts starting to side with him , SCOTUS says BUILD THAT WALL with military $$$

Nominally a little win but the campaign ads right themselves.

“Mexico will pay” 😂😂😂😂

The spying on him didn't prevent him from winning
Michael Cohen was going to bring him down
CNN and MSNBC had Avennatti on over and over, was going to take Trump down ! He was a " rock star" they told us.
Manfort, Flynn, they were going to " sing" and Trump woudl go down.
The Two Year Russian " Collusion" fiasco, all lies, all made up, and even worse, could have been engineered by the Dems from the get go
Courts ruling that there IS NO EVIDENCE that the Russians hacked the DNC servers
Mueller testifies, that was going to be it!
Zeroes all the way.
And Impeachment? Didn't the House just vote NOT to Impeach ?

Is it Prozac ? Or are you on something else? Can't be weed, you aren't mellow enough.

Today we found out that Mike Flynn actually met with Putin privately ....back in 2015 ....
He told everyone before they exchanged pleasantries at a dinner but house oversight has obtained emails SHOWING otherwise

There’s a lot more to this .

Oversight ! Can we hire tenacious trey gowdy as a consulatant ?

[Unregistered]

Ha Ha Ha Ha

" It’s a REFERENDUM on Trump. Period "


Ha Ha Ha Ha

“CNN flounders now, they’ve no idea what the best anti-Trump message is, given the total meltdown of the Russia narrative, post-Mueller,” a CNN employee said on the condition of anonymity. “My internal read is honestly that they’re in despair. They so believed in a Mueller smoking gun. I think they’re slowly realizing that Trump wins again, and they almost can’t fathom that outcome.”

Conservative strategist Chris Barron said that CNN’s decision not to ask about the Mueller probe “speaks volumes about how little political currency Mueller or the Russia hoax has even among Democratic partisans” at this point.

“It is fascinating that Mueller, who Democrats have spent two years making the centerpiece of their efforts to undermine the President, was conspicuously missing from last night’s debate,” Barron said.

So Ben Carson of all people was involved with trump and Flynn and Tim barrack

Plan was to use foreign capital to buy Westinghouse . Biggest nuke plant maker

Then disguise behind “American ownership” to escape as much oversight about shipping nuclear tech to Saudi !

Nasty republicans !

[Unregistered]

So Ben Carson of all people was involved with trump and Flynn and Tim barrack

Plan was to use foreign capital to buy Westinghouse . Biggest nuke plant maker

Then disguise behind “American ownership” to escape as much oversight about shipping nuclear tech to Saudi !

Nasty republicans !

Nuclear Plants that produce Power are not the same as Nuclear based weapon manufacturing like Obama allowed Iran to keep doing. And he sent them pallets of cash to boot !

Next.

[Unregistered]

Hear the cheers when Warren and Bernie embraced last night at end ?

That’s where the energy in party is!

Good luck cons ....even if it’s Biden he’s going to pushed a little ...no a lot ...to his LEFT ....

And just like republicans accommodated trumps lurch , the big tent will come together on the trump referendum but our candidates are leveraging the majority opposed to trump to a more liberal agenda

Gonna be beautiful

Public is ready for Obama 2.0

Look how warren REFUSED to disparage other Dems

[Unregistered]

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2538462]Not established. Senate intelligence said they could
Have . How do we know? Can you prove it ?



Show me a lawsuit that had anything close to “removal “ as a remedy , numbskull




Nominally a little win but the campaign ads right themselves.

“Mexico will pay” 😂😂😂😂

You forgot that stormy daniels case was a complete and total fabrication by democrats.
(why they would bank on a pornstar we will never know). this was also thrown out by the courts, not to mention her lawyer avanatti will probably be doing some serious jail time for extortion.....all these cases thrown out idiot democrats and liberals have nothing except to try and keep throwing SH_T up against a wall to see if it stinks....so pathetic. Easy win for TRUMP 2020.

[Unregistered]

Nuclear Plants that produce Power are not the same as Nuclear based weapon manufacturing like Obama allowed Iran to keep doing. And he sent them pallets of cash to boot !

Next.

No but the are an integral part of getting there because that’s the source of material one further enriches .

That’s the whole supposed point of why your panties were in a twist about the Iran deal.

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander con - looks like Tom
Barrack trump and the gang are trying to help Saudi and emirates and others take that step to nuclear powers

Why do they need nuke plants with all that oil of global warming ain’t a thing ?

This is how you guys tie yourselves into knots

[Unregistered]

Winners and losers from the first night of the CNN debate

More people watched Fox News and MSNBC that watched the Debate


Can Someone Please Vote CNN Off the Stage?

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Ten of the Democrats debated on Tuesday night. But the debate was dominated by Jake Tapper, Dana Bash and Don Lemon – CNN’s moderators.

Norm Ornstein got it right:

It’s not just that the time allocations were harsh. (The candidates were constantly being cut off, sometimes after being given all of 15 seconds to make their points.) And not just that the time allocation seemed somewhat arbitrary.

No, it was the questioning that really fell short – very, very short.

The CNN moderators, again and again, employed the very worst types of questions. One style that Tapper used repeatedly early on was interrupting to insist that the candidates stick to a portion of a topic that he found interesting (such as whether their health care plans would involve increases in taxes for the middle class) rather than what they wanted to talk about. The night also featured too many gotcha questions, in which a candidate is challenged about something they said.(1) But even worse was a constant theme of asking one candidate to fight with another. Candidate X, what do you think of Candidate Y’s plan

And just for fun....


MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Slips To 5th Place In July Ratings

[Unregistered]

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

So Ben Carson of all people was involved with trump and Flynn and Tim barrack

Plan was to use foreign capital to buy Westinghouse . Biggest nuke plant maker

Then disguise behind “American ownership” to escape as much oversight about shipping nuclear tech to Saudi !

Nasty republicans !

Ben Carson and Trump working so nicely together solving problems created by liberals and democrats....yet liberals and democrats call TRUMP a racist?...LMAO!!!!

The below video is proof but liberals do not want you to see.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MojzAf2O-Rg

[Unregistered]

No but the are an integral part of getting there because that’s the source of material one further enriches .

That’s the whole supposed point of why your panties were in a twist about the Iran deal.

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander con - looks like Tom
Barrack trump and the gang are trying to help Saudi and emirates and others take that step to nuclear powers

Why do they need nuke plants with all that oil of global warming ain’t a thing ?

This is how you guys tie yourselves into knots

You are absolutely clueless.
Why would they switch to nuclear? Energy Density of substances is why.


What is the difference between the nuclear material in a bomb, versus a reactor?

A nuclear reactor works by using the energy that is released when the nucleus of a heavy atom splits. That process is called fission.

In reactors, fission occurs when uranium atoms are hit by slow-moving neutrons. Absorbing these excess neutrons sometimes causes the atoms to break apart. As the nucleus splits, it releases energy, in the form of heat. In a boiling water reactor, this heat becomes steam, which drives turbines to generate the electricity that is used for everything from charging smartphones to heating homes.

Uranium comes in two principle forms, or isotopes: uranium 235 and uranium 238. Uranium 238 is the most common uranium isotope, and more stable. When it absorbs a neutron, it usually doesn’t break apart. Uranium 235 is more likely to undergo fission when hit by a slow-enough moving neutron. When hit, the nucleus absorbs the neutron, becomes unstable and decays, splits into two lighter atoms and throws out two or three new neutrons.

These additional neutrons crash into other uranium 235 atoms, causing them to break apart and release additional neutrons, and on and on. This is how you get a chain nuclear fission reaction. And each time an atom splits, it spews out another puff of heat.

But uranium 235 comprises only .7 percent of natural uranium. To get a self-sustaining chain reaction in a nuclear plant, the proportion of uranium 235 needs to be increased from .7 percent to about 4 percent. This is done through a process called enrichment.

“The goal in a reactor is to get it so you’re absorbing the exact number of neutrons created in the next generation as the previous generation. So you have the same number of fissions going on at all times,” said Peter Caracappa, a professor and radiation safety officer at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. “If you’re absorbing too many, the power’s going to go down. If you’re absorbing not enough, the power goes up.”

So you want these colonies of uranium 235 atoms to be breaking apart at a rate that generates enough, but not too many extra neutrons. The rate of chain reactions is controlled by rods of material that soak up the neutrons, and slow that chain of fission reactions. (When the machine is turned off and idle, it continues producing some excess heat through radioactive decay, which has been the source of problems at Japan’s Fukushima plant.)

In a bomb, on the other hand, you need nearly pure fissile material, said Arjun Makhijani, a nuclear engineer and president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. That is, material that is capable of sustaining such nuclear chain reactions. Most nuclear bombs are made up of isotopes of uranium 235 or plutonium 239.

“Commercial reactors have just a few percent fissile material in them, and bombs have more than 90 percent,” Makhijani said.

Those chain reactions aren’t slowed by uranium 238 or control rods. At least one neutron from each fission reaction is likely to cause another fission to occur. This means the chain reactions grow wildly, fast and uncontrolled, leading to tremendous explosions.


Thanks to PBS

[Unregistered]

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

You are absolutely clueless.
Why would they switch to nuclear? Energy Density of substances is why.


What is the difference between the nuclear material in a bomb, versus a reactor?

A nuclear reactor works by using the energy that is released when the nucleus of a heavy atom splits. That process is called fission.

In reactors, fission occurs when uranium atoms are hit by slow-moving neutrons. Absorbing these excess neutrons sometimes causes the atoms to break apart. As the nucleus splits, it releases energy, in the form of heat. In a boiling water reactor, this heat becomes steam, which drives turbines to generate the electricity that is used for everything from charging smartphones to heating homes.

Uranium comes in two principle forms, or isotopes: uranium 235 and uranium 238. Uranium 238 is the most common uranium isotope, and more stable. When it absorbs a neutron, it usually doesn’t break apart. Uranium 235 is more likely to undergo fission when hit by a slow-enough moving neutron. When hit, the nucleus absorbs the neutron, becomes unstable and decays, splits into two lighter atoms and throws out two or three new neutrons.

These additional neutrons crash into other uranium 235 atoms, causing them to break apart and release additional neutrons, and on and on. This is how you get a chain nuclear fission reaction. And each time an atom splits, it spews out another puff of heat.

But uranium 235 comprises only .7 percent of natural uranium. To get a self-sustaining chain reaction in a nuclear plant, the proportion of uranium 235 needs to be increased from .7 percent to about 4 percent. This is done through a process called enrichment.

“The goal in a reactor is to get it so you’re absorbing the exact number of neutrons created in the next generation as the previous generation. So you have the same number of fissions going on at all times,” said Peter Caracappa, a professor and radiation safety officer at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. “If you’re absorbing too many, the power’s going to go down. If you’re absorbing not enough, the power goes up.”

So you want these colonies of uranium 235 atoms to be breaking apart at a rate that generates enough, but not too many extra neutrons. The rate of chain reactions is controlled by rods of material that soak up the neutrons, and slow that chain of fission reactions. (When the machine is turned off and idle, it continues producing some excess heat through radioactive decay, which has been the source of problems at Japan’s Fukushima plant.)

In a bomb, on the other hand, you need nearly pure fissile material, said Arjun Makhijani, a nuclear engineer and president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. That is, material that is capable of sustaining such nuclear chain reactions. Most nuclear bombs are made up of isotopes of uranium 235 or plutonium 239.

“Commercial reactors have just a few percent fissile material in them, and bombs have more than 90 percent,” Makhijani said.

Those chain reactions aren’t slowed by uranium 238 or control rods. At least one neutron from each fission reaction is likely to cause another fission to occur. This means the chain reactions grow wildly, fast and uncontrolled, leading to tremendous explosions.


Thanks to PBS

I hope you were able to copy and paste all this?....If no, I would say you are a total loser with no life. I hope for your sake I am wrong.

[Unregistered]

I hope you were able to copy and paste all this?....If no, I would say you are a total loser with no life. I hope for your sake I am wrong.

Remember
" Good Luck to a fellow scientist " was the note I received at graduation.

[Unregistered]

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

Remember
" Good Luck to a fellow scientist " was the note I received at graduation.

wow, i guess you did type all this....sorry, i had no patience to read any part beyond three sentences.

[Unregistered]

I hope you were able to copy and paste all this?....If no, I would say you are a total loser with no life. I hope for your sake I am wrong.

He cribbed it from PBS!

Cons are now saying their bete noire , PBS, is unimpeachable science source?

As a REAL scientist let me declare that the con is clueless about the link between nuclear power and nuclear weapons