Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Sort of like Massachusetts?

Population New Zealand: 4.8 million
Population Massachusetts: 7 million

EVERY VOTE COUNTS!!!

And some states don't want laws like Massachusetts or New Zealand.

[Unregistered]

EVERY VOTE COUNTS!!!

Except when it doesn't.

Yes the ones the republicans steal as in NC-09

[Unregistered]

EVERY VOTE COUNTS!!!

And some states don't want laws like Massachusetts or New Zealand.

Those that condone the murder of innocents don’t .

Degenerates like you I suppose 😊

We see you.

Don’t lose the senate . And if you do that make sure you don’t lose WH.

Could be coming for your gun then 😊

[Unregistered]

Are you aware this is how laws happen?



Bill gets written voted in congrss or parliament . Passes . Law.

What’s your issue ?

Warning : ready to discuss the differences In our system in an informed and granular way . Mp

So our congress couldn’t do what their parliament did ?

Your move con.

Someone needs to return to school to take a class in the US Constitution and perhaps a refresher in world geography if you can't figure out the differences between the US and New Zealand and how that might apply to gun laws.

And all this time I thought liberals were so smaht. Well, at least they assure us all the time that they are.

New Zealand = uncodefied constitutional monarchy consisting of 11 regional councils, Total population: 4.8 million.

United States = codefied constitutional republic consisting of 50 sovereign states and 5 major territories, Total population: 327 million.

One of those codes in the US Constitution is the right to bear arms. No such code exists in New Zealand.

[Unregistered]

You do realize that Sinclair Broadcasting is the largest owner of local tv stations in the US, right? And you do know that it's ultra-conservative, right?

https://www.latimes.com/business/hol...405-story.html

https://www.vox.com/2018/4/3/1718002...s-tv-affiliate

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...e-media-empire

Do you realize what local means? Rarely does local address anything but local news.

Did you know that 6 major corporations control the media?

- Comcast-major holdings include NBC (including CNBC and MSNBC), Universal Pictures, many smaller cable channels (including The Weather Channel, USA, Bravo and E!) LIBERAL BIAS
- Disney– ABC, ESPN, Pixar, A&E, Lifetime and Marvel StudiosLIBERAL BIAS
- News Corporation– Fox (News, Sports and 20th Century), The Wall Street Journal, New York Post, FX, Barron’s, HarperCollins publishing CONSERVATIVE BIAS
- Time Warner– CNN, Time Magazine, Warner Bros, HBO, Cinemax, the CW, TBS, TNT
- CBS Corporation– CBS, Simon and Schuster LIBERAL BIAS
- Viacom– MTV, Comedy Central, BET, Paramount Pictures LIBERAL BIAS

It can be debated, but some feel these 6 corporation control 90% of media. But then there are also these companies, all of which have a LIBERAL BIAS except the last two.

- New York Times- perhaps the most influential newspaper in existence. Owned by the New York Times Company
- Washington Post- owned by Jeff Bezos of Amazon
- Associated Press (AP)- operated as a cooperative, non-profit association owned by many newspapers and broadcast members
- Tribune Company- owns some major newspapers like the Chicago Tribune and LA Times, as well as many local TV and radio stations
- Hearst Publications- owns San Francisco and Houston Chronicle, as well as many local TV and radio stations. (Note: does have some partnerships with Disney)
- Yahoo!- owned by Yahoo Inc., the highest-read news website in the world
- MSN- owned by Microsoft, the 2nd highest-read news website
Reuters- major British news agency, owned by Thomson Reuters
- PBS and NPR- owned by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a non-profit government subsidized entity
- Huffington Post- owned by AOL/Verizon, a popular liberal blog with almost 7 million Facebook followers
- Bloomberg- owned mostly by Michael Bloomberg, an influential financial news source
- iHeartMedia- the predominant owner and distributor of talk radio, broadcasting the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity
- The Drudge Report- run by Matt Drudge. The conservative-leaning site aggregates content from other news agencies, but is very influential and uses many different news outlets, often foreign or more obscure

What can't be debated is that the vast majority of media has a LIBERAL BIAS with only News Corp, iHeart, and Drudge providing a conservative viewpoint. Isn't interesting that so few have so much influence which is exactly why the left is trying to stamp out their message.

[Unregistered]

Who is making nightly pillow talk with Trump? Hannity. Who has former Fox bobble heads in their administration? Trump.

And how can all those outlets be state run TV when the Dems aren't in power? That's not how it works.

Seriously??? You ask that question when 90% of the media has been in bed with Democrats for decades???

[Unregistered]

Despite Obama's many differences with Fox he at least did do some interviews with the network while in office. Trump never appears on MSNBC or CNN; every once in awhile he'll do a quickie interview with one of the big 3 networks. Obama also never called Fox a threat to our democracy (but he certainly questioned their journalistic integrity) or call for violence against Fox. You can't say the same about Trump and CNN.

Are you for real???

Trump Discusses Claims of ‘Fake News,’ and Their Impact, With New York Times Publisher

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/01/b...ews-media.html

According to the Washington Post: "Combined, Trump has granted five interviews to NBC, MSNBC, ABC and CBS".

According to CNN: "The New York Times has had four interviews with the President, NBC and Reuters have had three each, and the Wall Street Journal has had two."

Also according to CNN, Obama allowed Fox to interview him 3 times during his 8 years in office, all with Chris Wallace, a registered Democrat that even we conservatives like for his fair reporting.

But let's not forget what Obama did to Fox during his 8 years. According to Snopes: "President Obama attempted to delegitimize Fox News by calling their oppositional stance "destructive" for the country, took questions from Fox News correspondents less frequently than he did from those of other major networks in press briefings, and his administration expressed a willingness to exclude Fox reporters from interviews with top officials."

WHEN OBAMA WENT TO WAR ON FOX NEWS
https://www.newsweek.com/when-obama-...ox-news-632424

CBS correspondent says 'it should be noted' that the Obama White House 'demonized' Fox News daily
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/41...basis-says-cbs

Fox News reporter secretly monitored by Obama administration: court documents
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fox-new...urt-documents/

[Unregistered]

All those Conservative District Judges. Two additions to SCOTUS.
Existing home sales up. Interest rates low without gimmicks. Number one in the world for energy production.

Let's ask the Dems what they could possibly improve, because Obama didn't, what's changed?

Can they lower the unemployment rate ? Can they increase wages? Can they increase the numbers of employed ?
They haven't presented any ideas to do any of that.

Details, details. Dems would prefer to talk about giving 16 year olds and illegals the vote, allowing women to kill their babies even after birth, eliminating the electoral college. And of course whether Tom Ford will provide clothing for Melania or not. You know, important stuff.

Isn't that why the DNC won't air their primary debates on Fox?

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2452837]

Sorry but FBI investigated, found her guilty but then said intent mattered so didn't press charges. Intent didn't matter for the Naval Seamen they locked up. Why you are so vested to have a politician be held to a different set of rules than everyone else is beyond me.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system

It's not the job of the FBI to determine whether to prosecute or not. Their job is to investigate. It's the DOJ's job to prosecute and now we know why Comey did what he did. Because he knew the DOJ would never prosecute. That had been decided well in advance of the completion of the investigation.

[Unregistered]

And former executive editor of The New York Times, Jill Abramson, to name another off the top of my head.

Don't forget Lara Logan.

"We’ve become political activists in a sense. And some could argue, propagandists, right?" she said about the mainstream media. "The media everywhere is mostly liberal. Not just in the U.S. But in this country, 85 percent of journalists are registered Democrats. So that’s just a fact, right?... So the facts are on the side of what you just stated. Most journalists are left or liberal or Democrat or whatever word you want to give it. I always joke about the other 14 percent were too lazy to register. And there’s maybe one percent that’s on the right."
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...standards.html

[Unregistered]

Details, details. Dems would prefer to talk about giving 16 year olds and illegals the vote, allowing women to kill their babies even after birth, eliminating the electoral college. And of course whether Tom Ford will provide clothing for Melania or not. You know, important stuff.

Isn't that why the DNC won't air their primary debates on Fox?

It is nearly unbelievable that anyone buys into any of their crap.

Only India and China possibly have better economic growth right now than America. Democrats want to redistribute wealth and raise taxes , including Corporate taxes.

Now that we are leading the world in energy production, exporting oil, the Dems want to tear it all down. Go green , and we will freeze.

The unemployment rate is at record lows, and they want to have "guaranteed basic income "

40 % of College Grads are underemployed , yet they want more College Grads and they want taxpayers to foot their bill.
Mexico is mowing down their previous murder records, and Democrats are now against a wall, and against doing anything to stop the flow of illegals.

And this:

"It is a fact that we can change human behaviors without much change to our lifestyle and we can save the future generations of our country and this world."

Sen. @KamalaHarris, who is vying for the 2020 Democratic nomination, campaigned in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

[Unregistered]

And former executive editor of The New York Times, Jill Abramson, to name another off the top of my head.

And Sharyl Attkisson the former CBS investigative reporter who wrote "The Smear: How Shady Political Operatives and Fake News Control What You See, What You Think, and How You Vote."

Let's not also forget Attkisson alleges that her computers were hacked by the Obama administration, the same Obama administration that went after Fox's James Rosen, the New York Times' James Risen, and several AP reporters.

Judge faults feds for ‘Kafkaesque’ stance in journalist’s surveillance suit
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...e-suit-1232528

[Unregistered]

Yes the ones the republicans steal as in NC-09

NC should do like California did - make ballot harvesting legal. That solves that problem and allows the chosen party to win.

EVERY VOTE COUNTS!!!

[Unregistered]

Someone needs to return to school to take a class in the US Constitution and perhaps a refresher in world geography if you can't figure out the differences between the US and New Zealand and how that might apply to gun laws.

And all this time I thought liberals were so smaht. Well, at least they assure us all the time that they are.

New Zealand = uncodefied constitutional monarchy consisting of 11 regional councils, Total population: 4.8 million.

United States = codefied constitutional republic consisting of 50 sovereign states and 5 major territories, Total population: 327 million.

One of those codes in the US Constitution is the right to bear arms. No such code exists in New Zealand.

SC said differently . There are limits. Didn’t Scalia right that opinion.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Fear not. Though a lib I believe in the amendment . Y’all can keep your muskets

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[Unregistered]

Are you for real???

Trump Discusses Claims of ‘Fake News,’ and Their Impact, With New York Times Publisher

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/01/b...ews-media.html

According to the Washington Post: "Combined, Trump has granted five interviews to NBC, MSNBC, ABC and CBS".

According to CNN: "The New York Times has had four interviews with the President, NBC and Reuters have had three each, and the Wall Street Journal has had two."

Also according to CNN, Obama allowed Fox to interview him 3 times during his 8 years in office, all with Chris Wallace, a registered Democrat that even we conservatives like for his fair reporting.

But let's not forget what Obama did to Fox during his 8 years. According to Snopes: "President Obama attempted to delegitimize Fox News by calling their oppositional stance "destructive" for the country, took questions from Fox News correspondents less frequently than he did from those of other major networks in press briefings, and his administration expressed a willingness to exclude Fox reporters from interviews with top officials."

WHEN OBAMA WENT TO WAR ON FOX NEWS
https://www.newsweek.com/when-obama-...ox-news-632424

CBS correspondent says 'it should be noted' that the Obama White House 'demonized' Fox News daily
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/41...basis-says-cbs

Fox News reporter secretly monitored by Obama administration: court documents
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fox-new...urt-documents/

Nor did Obama ban certain reporters just because he didn't like their questions. Ignoring is one thing, banning another. And the so-called "demonizing" Obama did pales in comparison to what Trump does. Trump goes after CNN and WaPo and others relentlessly. Any media outlet that isn't on his side is fair game. Obama had a beef (a legitimate one) with Fox and only Fox. I don't recall Obama imposing his face on a wrestler and doing a smack down on a Fox reporter and calling Fox and enemy of the people