Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Sure, what would he know ?
-
DEA Task Force Officer Taylor Cleveland doesn’t work for Fox.
Sure, what would he know ? -
Or the democrats are growing their version of the “freedom caucus “Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Good luck con ....
We all know how to interpret those “I’m a democrat but “ posts
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Comment
-
From the DEA’s 2018 National Drug Threat Assessment
https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/fi...resolution.pdf
DRUG SMUGGLING AND TRANSPORTATION METHODS
Mexican TCOs transport the majority of illicit drugs into the United States across the SWB using a wide array of smuggling techniques. The most common method employed by these TCOs involves transporting illicit drugs through U.S. POEs in passenger vehicles with concealed compartments or commingled with legitimate goods on tractor trailers. In some instances, regardless of method, the size of the loads has decreased, while the number of them has increased.
Other cross-border smuggling techniques employed by Mexican TCOs include the use of subterranean tunnels, which originate in Mexico and lead into safe-houses on the U.S. side of the border. Underground tunnels are mainly used to smuggle ton quantities of marijuana, though there are instances of other illicit drugs commingled in shipments. Tunnels seized and destroyed by U.S. law enforcement authorities along the SWB are primarily found in California and Arizona, and are generally associated with the Sinaloa Cartel.
Mexican TCOs also transport illicit drugs to the United States aboard commercial cargo trains and passenger buses. To a lesser extent, Mexican TCOs use maritime vessels off the coast of California. Mexican TCOs also rely on traditional drug smuggling methods, such as the use of backpackers, or “mules,” on clandestine land trails to cross remote areas of the SWB into the United States.
Mexican TCOs exploit various aerial methods to transport illicit drugs across
the SWB. These methods include the use of ultralight aircraft and unmanned aerial systems (UASs) and drones to conduct air drops. Ultralights are primarily used to transport marijuana shipments, depositing the drugs in close proximity to the SWB. Currently, UASs can only convey small multi-kilogram amounts of illicit drugs at a time and are therefore not commonly used, though there is potential for increased growth and use. Mexican TCOs also use UASs to monitor the activity of U.S. law enforcement along the SWB to identify cross-border vulnerabilities.
For the Cons with reading comprehension problems the report says that most illegal drugs come into the U.S. through legal points of entry.
Estimates are 90% come through POE’s and the other 10% come through elsewhere.
A dumbass vanity wall will have no affect on the 90% and very little affect on the 10%.Comment
-
This lib not going to get into a pedantic war with the cons .
Suffice it to say that there will never be a big beautiful wall and Mexico will
Never pay a dimeComment
-
Just take a look at the terrain you have to cross outside of legal points of entry. Some of it isn't even passable except by foot. How much drugs can people carry in backpacks over rough terrain and desert conditions? POE's are far more efficient and the cartels accept that they'll lose a certain portion; they just try to minimize it as best they can. They're incredibly creative, always have been. A wall won't stop shi te.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Do Liberals use their brains, or just stay in lockstep with the narrative? There is no way of knowing what percentages of illegals drugs are smuggled in by what methods. Why ? Because if they are smuggled in , it is an unknown. Did 1 lbs get through? 10 ? 1000 ? You don’t know because they aren’t caught.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Sure the Government gives estimates, but those need to be done for funding, staff and enforcement issues.
You have no idea how many illegals are here unless you catch them and count them all. You have no idea how many illegal drugs are smuggled in unless you confiscate all of them.
But just for fun, let’s accept 10 %. Stopping ANY amount will without a doubt sane American lives. Stopping ANY amount will without a doubt reduce the cost for treatment of the users. Stopping ANY amount will take funds away from the smugglers, the gangs, the cartels and the string of associated criminal activity that goes with it.
Have you ever been to the Tower of of Pisa in Italy ? Have you personally seen the wall that surrounds the Tower and the Cathedral ? That wall was built centuries ago to keep the scum of the earth away from the people. That wall was the difference between safety and death. Human nature, the human condition has not changed, and has never changed. Build the Wall, Finish the Wall and keep the scum of the earth out. It is that simple. They knew it centuries ago, and we know it today. If an illegal can’t get in, he can’t kill nd American. If we make it harder , ANY WAY POSSIBLE to smuggle drugs in the are KILLING Americans, even if we reduce it by 10 %, 5 % or any percent, we are SAVING American lives.
Let the failed societies be responsible for their own damage. Those are their problems, not the problems of Americans. It is that simple.Comment
-
Roger Stone is an idiot. We all knew he would do something to get his bail revoked.
I myself thought it would witness tampering, but Stone decided attacking the Judge was the way to go. Lol.Comment
-
Harris Smollett was the victim of "an attempted modern day *****ing" and called the actor "one of the kindest, most gentle human beings I know."
//////
"OK, so, I will say this about that case," she said. "I think that the facts are still unfolding, and, um, I’m very, um, concerned about obviously, the initial, um, allegation that he made about what might have happened.
"And it’s something we should all take seriously whenever anyone, um, alleges that kind of behavior, but there should be an investigation," Harris added. "And I think that once the investigation has concluded then we can all comment, but I’m not going to comment until I know the outcome of the investigation."
#liberalhypocrisy
#4Comment
-
That borders on a threat of harm. Making political commentary already is outside the scope of what she warned him about, but he published her picture with a pretend site at the top left. I'd lmao if she slapped his goof azz in jailOriginally posted by Unregistered View Post
https://www.palmerreport.com/analysi...d-looks/16063/Comment
-
He's claiming he didn't see it but it's definitely not part of the type that's in the background behind her. Looks very much added in. That could be a felony charge.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/wan...nstagram-flub/Comment
-
Why is it that the formerly “law and order cons” aren’t more animated when someone starts the day by putting cross hairs next to the portrait of a federal judge ? .....Comment
-
Did Stone do it to get the judge to recuse? If she doesn't and he's found guilty he will claim shes biased against him. What a conniving doucheOriginally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Threatening a judge never ‘pays off’. Stone was just being Stone. He can’t help himself.Comment
-
Good morning !
Note to cons ....RBG back up to speed at the SC!
Keep hoping ! TrumpComment
Comment