Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Trump is asking for $5.7 billion out of an annual budget of $4.4 trillion.

In other words, Trump is asking for an annual budget of $57 out of an annual household budget of $44,070.

Let's think about that.

Imagine your other half saying "we're not going back to work, the kids aren't getting their allowances, and no bills are getting paid until you give up the idea of spending $57 to fence our yard".

We don’t negotiate with terrorists.

[Unregistered]

We don’t negotiate with terrorists.

TDS is pretty strong, huh?

[Unregistered]

We don’t negotiate with terrorists.

We don't? Care to explain the relationship with Cuba?

[Unregistered]

Trump is asking for $5.7 billion out of an annual budget of $4.4 trillion.

In other words, Trump is asking for an annual budget of $57 out of an annual household budget of $44,070.

Let's think about that.

Imagine your other half saying "we're not going back to work, the kids aren't getting their allowances, and no bills are getting paid until you give up the idea of spending $57 to fence our yard".

It's not about the amount but how the money will spent. $5.5B won't even build much of a wall. Dems offered up $5.5B for SECURITY measures (more staff, equipment) but not a wall. Almost everyone but his die hard base agrees this is a better way to spend money than on a wall.

[Unregistered]

Maybe the right sends their kids to DC to visit museums and landmarks rather than pimping them out at right to life March? Under 18. Parents consented to this

When I went to DC with HS we visited Arlington cemetery , fords theater , wh etc ....no politically tinged marches until
We were old enough to decide for selves , not pimped out by parents to their favorite social war.

It's also an IRS violation for religious organizations to advocate politically. Pulpit Politics. Yes it happens all the time but is not always easy to catch. This one is obvious.

[Unregistered]

You proud of the decision in NY? Abortion right up until birth? Why not deliver the child and give it up? It has to be delivered dead or alive.

But these same folks are abolishing the death penalty. So guilty adults are safe even if it is murder. Innocent babies. Dead. Make sense?

Anyone out there born a week “early”? Imagine being lethally injected in the 39th week. And then having your body parts sold.

Idiot - it's still for cases where the woman's health is at risk. Sorry but most doctors are very ethical and aren't going to start allowing women to abort viable children without a medical reason. They also could risk their medical license if they did so.

"Under the rights guaranteed by Roe v. Wade and New York law, all women have the right to an abortion at any time in their first 24 weeks of pregnancy. After 24 weeks, exceptions can be made under federal law when a woman's life or health is at risk. But the 1970 New York law made exceptions only when a woman's life is at risk.

The Reproductive Health Act (the new rules) changes New York's law to permit abortions after 24 weeks in case where a woman's life or health would be threatened by continuing the pregnancy. The updated New York law leaves it to doctors to decide when a woman's health is at risk. Opponents argued that the law should have defined what constitutes a threat to a pregnant woman's health. Republican lawmakers say the change gives too much discretion to doctors, and could open the door to late-term abortions that are not medically necessary." https://www.syracuse.com/expo/news/g...for-women.html

[Unregistered]

Roger Stone, an eccentric longtime Republican strategist with a tattoo of Richard Nixon’s face on his back, was arrested Friday on criminal charges that include obstruction of an official proceeding,*false statements and witness tampering.

About freaking time.

How long will Mr Tough Guy stick it out now that the Feds have dragged him away? Any fool willing to go to jail for Trump gets what he deserves.

[Unregistered]

They were merely using their Rights as stated in the Bill of Rights. The same rights that Pro Abortion supporters do. That Bill of Rights says you have the Right to Free Speech, but there isn't any right to make anyone listen.
That is, if you don't like their opinion you should just ignore it. The fact that you, and others , can't ignore it is your problem , not theirs..
The fact is that Adults didn't ignore it, the Adults verbally abused them, and the annoying Native American with the drum, that created the problem. Had the adults just remained silent , the entire incident would not have occurred. Watch the entire tape.

That's why the Bill of Rights was written that way. If you don't t like what they say, use the methods to make sure their views go no further than speaking. Elections. Laws. Policies,. The Courts. That's where America's grievances are resolved. Not by approaching children, threatening children , bullying children through social media and the MSM.

The Progressives would have you believe that a " threat to our Democracy " are Russian Bots and Facebook Ads. The real threat to Democracy is front and center, right here. This is exactly what the left does to destroy society from within. It has happened before.

The US Government grants Pell Grants to students attending Religious Schools of Higher Education. Obama signed off on that when he was President , as it has been a long standing process. Don't preach about Politics and Religion. Plenty of Politicians and Clergy have been quoted at the Pulpit talking Politics. It is called Free Speech.

It's still an IRS violation but one that the IRS rarely goes after. Having minors attend such an event is even worse than preaching to adults.

[Unregistered]

It's not about the amount but how the money will spent. $5.5B won't even build much of a wall. Dems offered up $5.5B for SECURITY measures (more staff, equipment) but not a wall. Almost everyone but his die hard base agrees this is a better way to spend money than on a wall.

Would he have been ok if he just said "fence or a barrier"? Because, dems were OK when other Presidents and candidates advocated for it.

Now, because Oranjina blabbered about a "big, beautiful wall" your panties went into knot-mode.

[Unregistered]

How long will Mr Tough Guy stick it out now that the Feds have dragged him away? Any fool willing to go to jail for Trump gets what he deserves.

Read some of the indictment over coffee. Mueller has communications between trump campaign and stone coordinating wiki leaks releases

It’s over for the traitors

[Unregistered]

Read some of the indictment over coffee. Mueller has communications between trump campaign and stone coordinating wiki leaks releases

It’s over for the traitors

Mueller is one smart operator. The Stone indictments are all post-election. For now. Mueller will hold the election year charges over Stone like a dangling sword. Expect Roger to fold soon, followed by Trump denials and proverbial bus-tossing.

[Unregistered]

Mueller is one smart operator. The Stone indictments are all post-election. For now. Mueller will hold the election year charges over Stone like a dangling sword. Expect Roger to fold soon, followed by Trump denials and proverbial bus-tossing.

I want to know who “directed” a senior trump campaign official to coordinate with Wiki leaks via Roger Stone. Guaranteed to have name “Donald.”

[Unregistered]

Would he have been ok if he just said "fence or a barrier"? Because, dems were OK when other Presidents and candidates advocated for it.

Now, because Oranjina blabbered about a "big, beautiful wall" your panties went into knot-mode.

Thats' the problem. He wants a WALL. A physical wall he can take selfies in front of and tweet to his fans. Dems and most in the GOP are advocating for SECURITY. This deal was already hammered out before Christmas but once Limbaugh and Coulter found out there is no WALL funding the balked and Trump shut down the government. Until Cheetolini finds a way to save face and keep his base happy he won't budge. It's now up the GOP leadership (an oxymoron I know) to talk the toddler into a deal.

[Unregistered]

I want to know who “directed” a senior trump campaign official to coordinate with Wiki leaks via Roger Stone. Guaranteed to have name “Donald.”

Individual One.

[Unregistered]

Individual One.

One thing we’ve learned ....cons are very brazen


"September 26, 2017—the day that Stone testified before HPSCI and denied having ever sent or received emails or text messages from [Credico]—Stone and [Credico] exchanged over THIRTY text messages"