Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

liberals = hypocrites

Another example. Dems whined about investigating Clinton, now they want to investigate Ivanka and let's be real. There is NO COMPARISON between what Clinton did and what Ivanka did. NONE!

House Dems to investigate Ivanka Trump's email use
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4...onal-email-use

[Unregistered]

The hard truth of the matter.

"Politicians constantly convince citizens to vote against the other party, as opposed to making a positive case for their own reelections; polls show citizens despise both parties’ establishments and hate our rigged political system.

Both parties again ran the blue state/red state scam in which voters are convinced to choose the lesser of two unchanging evils. It is designed to prevent the rise of a credible third party, allowing the two parties to regularly trade off control between their respective leaderships.

The election is over, and Washington is about to return to the status quo. The Senate has re-elected the same leaders. Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) — who many members kept at arm’s length during the campaign — walked into a closed-door caucus and reportedly received a standing ovation.

..... Pelosi has long been one of the most unpopular U.S. politicians..... It is not clear how many seats might have flipped if Pelosi had pledged that new leadership would take over the party if Democrats prevailed in the House. Even if only 2 percent of voters had been impacted, it could have been enough to change the outcomes of a number of key races.... Voters were fed assurances that the many new members would insist on new leadership. Those pledges would seem easy to fulfill, with post-election polls showing that 56 percent of Democrats oppose Pelosi as Speaker.

.... So why are Democrats again pushing her to be the face of their party leading to the 2020 election? Because these elections are about them — certainly not about the marks who vote. Pelosi will deliver committee positions, campaign money and other benefits that some new leadership is unlikely to guarantee..... Voters simply give them votes; Pelosi gives them cold-hard cash and other perks.

Given polls showing Pelosi at less than 40 percent popularity, she and the Democratic establishment are redefining the election, and not for the first time. Leading up to the 2016 election, every poll showed that voters were looking for non-establishment candidates and that Hillary Clinton remained one of the least popular establishment candidates ever to run for the presidency. Yet, Democratic leaders rigged the primaries for Clinton — and lost to the most unpopular Republican presidential candidate ever.

..... Pelosi declared that voters really did not want change and that she would remain as the party’s face. It was that easy. After the most anti-establishment election in U.S. history, Pelosi declared that voters wanted her and the establishment to stay in power.

Now, Pelosi and Democratic leaders are saying that polls showing overwhelming opposition to her are uniformly wrong. She told CNN that she has “a broad base of support in the country” and voters want her as Speaker because she’s a woman. She described her opposition as being sexist, a betrayal of voters who wanted a “pink wave.” When asked about a letter with 17 members pledging to oppose her, Pelosi told reporters that "You'd have to ask those people what their motivation is. I think of the 17, it's mostly, like, 14 men who are on that letter." She added that “any misogyny involved in it, it's their problem, not mine." That’s not Trump but fellow Democrats who Pelosi charges as being misogynistic. Identity politics, it seems, is like the god Saturn: It devours its young.

Even though recent polls show only 39 percent of Democratic voters support Pelosi’s return, she is likely to prevail in a vote later this month.

So the establishment will continue in both parties, despite overwhelming unpopularity."

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...agVP0.facebook

[Unregistered]

Why does Yogi come to mind???

https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...9a&oe=5CB0ED42

[Unregistered]

https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/...1120120100.jpg

Gov. Jerry Brown proposes easing logging rules to thin forests
https://www.santacruzsentinel.com/20...G2ORpaQKeQoBDo

[Unregistered]

According to Reuters, the president canceled due to logistical and security concerns related to the rain and cloud cover, preventing Trump’s helicopter from landing and making a motorcade logistically difficult.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1NF0NU


Also from that article...



Ben Rhodes, who served as deputy national security adviser for strategic communications under President Barack Obama, said the excuse about the inclement weather did not stand up.

“I helped plan all of President Obama’s trips for 8 years,” he wrote on Twitter. “There is always a rain option. Always.”



The rain option would have been to attend a ceremony close to where Trump was staying while in Paris. One that wouldn’t have involved an hour drive. But Trump said “Screw it, I’m not doing anything.”

And then he proved again on Veteran’s Day that he just doesn’t give a ****.

[Unregistered]

CIA says with 'high confidence' that MSB ordered the killing of Khashoggi.

Trump says, "Maybe he did, maybe he didn't."

Can't wait for this POS to be run out of office.

[Unregistered]

Another example. Dems whined about investigating Clinton, now they want to investigate Ivanka and let's be real. There is NO COMPARISON between what Clinton did and what Ivanka did. NONE!

House Dems to investigate Ivanka Trump's email use
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4...onal-email-use

So we're supposed to take the word of her attorney that there was no nonsense going on? No, I don't think so. She was doing government business on a personal account completely against protocol - protocol which she should have know about given the non stop crying about HRC's emails. If there's nothing there she's got nothing to worry about, but she sure looks stupid.

[Unregistered]

Gov. Jerry Brown proposes easing logging rules to thin forests
https://www.santacruzsentinel.com/20...G2ORpaQKeQoBDo

The Federal government controls 33M acres of forest land in CA. Make the Feds should have been raking more.

[Unregistered]

CIA says with 'high confidence' that MSB ordered the killing of Khashoggi.

Trump says, "Maybe he did, maybe he didn't."

Can't wait for this POS to be run out of office.

Not only our intel but intel agencies of Canada, Germany, Turkey, Great Britain. It's all about the money for Trump. Both he and Jared own them money and both have plans for development there.

[Unregistered]

All the stock market gains for 2018 have been wiped out.

[Unregistered]

Lol

https://preview.ibb.co/g09Auq/273458...AC84-CD011.png

[Unregistered]

Yes he received millions from a shady organization that doesn't reveal their donors.

[Unregistered]

Yes he received millions from a shady organization that doesn't reveal their donors.

He's unqualified for the job, dirty (on the board of a company that bilked investors and threatened to sue the company for damages), homophobic, and clearly biased towards Trump (the Justice Department's job isn't to do the president's dirty work and go after political rivals).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...=.7923acc25fdc

[Unregistered]

He's unqualified for the job, dirty (on the board of a company that bilked investors and threatened to sue the company for damages), homophobic, and clearly biased towards Trump (the Justice Department's job isn't to do the president's dirty work and go after political rivals).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...=.7923acc25fdc

A story on NPR this morning looked into his board role at World Patents, a sham company that bilked hopeful inventors for millions to supposedly walk them through the patent process. A class action suit led the FTC to conclude the company was a sham. He's claiming he knew nothing (not an excuse as a board member). Several other board members have returned the money they received but Whitaker has not. https://www.npr.org/2018/11/21/66989...f-patent-scams

[Unregistered]

Trump now making enemies with Chief Justice Roberts.