Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
-
"Whatever it takes" -
Hey Con I wouldn't go there. Your party is the party of old white perverts and the list is even longer.Comment
-
Sounds racist.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
What do you mean by "there"? Like, asking someone to send over their daughter so they can have there way with them? That kind of "there"?Comment
-
Cons had absolutely no issue with denying Obama his choice, but scream like stuck pigs when their rapist nominee isn’t immediately confirmed.Comment
-
What problem do you have with " advice and consent of the Senate " ?Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
They advised and they decided not to consent to him being on the SCOTUS.
You have a problem with the Constitution ?Comment
-
Have you actually been paying attention to what has been going on lately???Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
This.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
This sums up the liberals today.
Have a due process one is to follow. Don't follow it. Finish with the process, bring in something intentionally late. Try to delay it. THEN use the word "rapist" and "immediately" as often as possible.
Make a meme.
Forward it. Tweet it. Let the NYT pick it up. Use it as a campaign talking point.
"Whatever it takes"Comment
-
Yep, and the first accusation wasn't graphic enough. So now the Dems have to kick it up a notch and go for the real hard core allegation of sexual assault. More " breaking news " impact when you can use specific words to trigger there base.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Why haven't we seen the original letter in its entirety ?Comment
-
That story is so bad, that even the New York Times wouldn't touch.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Interesting too that one of the co-authors happens to be Ronan Farrow who exposed the Weinstein story.
""Previn, the 47-year-old adopted daughter of Mia Farrow and composer Andre Previn, has maintained a decades-long silence since the exposure of her affair with Allen in the early 1990s when he was still dating Farrow. Debate has long raged about the appropriateness of their relationship in light of the fact the director was, at least in theory, something of a father figure in Previn’s unusual family set-up, which included thirteen siblings, as well as the fact she was only 21 and Allen 56 when news of their affair first broke (that Farrow was herself 21 when she married a 50-year-old Frank Sinatra is apparently irrelevant in this saga). Relations between the parties were strained yet further when, shortly after discovering the relationship, Farrow accused Allen of molesting her younger daughter Dylan.
Immediately upon publication of the controversial interview with Previn, the court of public opinion handed down its judgment: Allen was still a monster, Previn his victim-accomplice and journalist Daphne Merkin, who conducted the interview, a toady..... she has been labelled a liar and/or a victim (of Allen’s), both labels serving only to undermine Previn’s story. One of her fiercest critics this week was her younger brother Ronan Farrow, the reporter whose story on Harvey Weinstein’s sexual abuse effectively launched #MeToo and earned him a Pulitzer Prize. Yet despite his leading role in a movement that demands “believe women”, Ronan published a statement in which he not only disputed his sister’s allegations, but erased her entirely from her own story. Chillingly, nowhere in his statement, which was published on Twitter, does Ronan mention Previn by name, instead reducing her to an anonymous “ally” of Allen’s." "
https://quillette.com/2018/09/20/believe-some-women/Comment
-
Comment