Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Excellent!

    Isn’t that what “March for our Lives” is wanting? Are you aware that your attacks on Fl teenagers will actually stand in the way of your ^^^ stated goal.

    Seriously. If you favor universal background checks why side with NRA while calling out these kids? They’ve made more progress than anyone before them.

    Please consider whether this is another instance of hating libs and therefore hurting positions you claim to believe in
    My attacks on FL teenagers? I never attacked anyone. There you go again thinking there is one person of differing political views on here again. You asked a general question to an admitted general group of people ("Bore-us") and I answered.

    Not every conservative person is a gun-nut.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      No - “coastal elites” I. E . The blue “maker” states have been ignored by trump. Any help for CA fires like when hurricanes hit the red states

      Nope

      So ‘eff off
      Or the brown-skinned folk still suffering in Puerto Rico.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Or the brown-skinned folk still suffering in Puerto Rico.
        Another area where they let politics take over instead of helping the people. Sad.

        On another note, another member of the DNC has to step down due to "insensitive" term (colored people).

        I think you need to consider your usage of "brown-skinned" tsk-tsk

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Another area where they let politics take over instead of helping the people. Sad.

          On another note, another member of the DNC has to step down due to "insensitive" term (colored people).

          I think you need to consider your usage of "brown-skinned" tsk-tsk
          I was merely pointing out the real reason why the residents of PR got not help. The WH doesn't care about helping them because his base doesn't care.

          Absolutely if you hesitate using a word or phrase for even a millisecond you should find other words.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Is THAT your barometer ? So Russian take-over via FB and other platforms fine so long as FB revenue doesn’t suffer. That what you saying ?

            Funny . Zuch and FB in news today and here you are like a good troll running interference ...

            Let’s see what happens when FB is regulated more like a utility?
            Why aren't you wetting your pants over Russian intrusion of Twitter?

            https://www.fastcompany.com/40547818...r-turned-toxic

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Why aren't you wetting your pants over Russian intrusion of Twitter?

              https://www.fastcompany.com/40547818...r-turned-toxic
              Amazon has more information on Americans than does Facebook and the owner also runs a political newspaper noted for peddling fake news and being anti-Trump. Hmmm....

              No problem there, right TMan?

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                I was merely pointing out the real reason why the residents of PR got not help. The WH doesn't care about helping them because his base doesn't care.

                Absolutely if you hesitate using a word or phrase for even a millisecond you should find other words.
                Actually, a growing them out of PR is they are being used as pawns by the crazy mayor. This has been a long-standing problem and she's using Trump to gain some camera time. Common theme today.

                What if I don't hesitate...what if I come right out and just drop the n-bomb. That OK?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Well that lede really distorts the data bit yesterday’s Q poll showd Americans believe media like 57% to 31% for trump

                  So polls polls polls. Looks like you need to suck it on that !
                  Nice try TMan.

                  The poll shows that 77 percent of respondents believe that fake news is reported at least occasionally, up from 63 percent who said the same last year.

                  The Monmouth poll was conducted on March 2-5, 2018 not February, 2017 like you were trying to pull off.

                  Here's another for you TMan,.

                  From a Harvard CAPS-Harris survey in February.

                  68 percent of voters say that there is “a lot” of fake news in the mainstream media and 84 percent say it’s difficult to know what online news to believe.

                  Another fom October of last year.

                  Nearly half of voters, 46 percent, believe the news media fabricate news stories about President Donald Trump and his administration, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.

                  Just 37 percent of voters think the media do not fabricate stories, the poll shows, while the remaining 17 percent are undecided.


                  Seeing a trend here, TMan?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Nope. Just another of your lies to cover.

                    Please link source showing that obama campaign violated the law or FB terms of service .

                    You can’t .

                    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

                    Con desperation has me smiling 24/7 these days

                    Cons sure are wanting to talk almost anything but tariffs now that both FOX and MSNBC pointing out the fecklessness
                    R
                    When have they agreed?

                    Oh cons ....it will be a delicious 🍔. Open up, say “aaaahh” and have a big bite
                    From Politifacts:
                    "Under the way Facebook allowed its apps to operate between 2010 and 2015, Obama’s 2012 re-election app and the survey app used by Cambridge Analytica had access not only to their users’ profiles but their friends’ list and their biographical information.

                    When the user approved it, these apps could access details such as users’ and their friends’ tags, likes and demographics.

                    Over a million people downloaded the Obama for America app. Around 300,000 people downloaded the personality survey app that ended up sending their data to Cambridge Analytica.

                    The Obama campaign created a Facebook app for supporters to donate, learn of voting requirements, and find nearby houses to canvass. The app asked users’ permission to scan their photos, friends lists, and news feeds. Most users complied.

                    The people signing up knew the data they were handing over would be used to support a political campaign. Their friends, however, did not.

                    The people who downloaded the app used by Cambridge Analytica did not know their data would be used to aid any political campaigns. The app was billed as a personality quiz that would be used by Cambridge University researchers.

                    The Obama campaign and Cambridge Analytica both gained access to huge amounts of information about Facebook users and their friends, and in neither case did the friends of app users consent."

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      No we also need the ability to remove weapons from unstable people (Parkland ), better registration and licensing, track purchases (Vegas) and consistent laws state to state.

                      Not the op
                      You gave examples how current laws were ignored and yet you think adding more laws will make a difference???

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        “Universal background checks” means closing the loopholes where sales at gun shows and between private parties are NOT subject to background checks .

                        So when a 🥜 ter tells you, like one told you, “all we have to do is enforce current laws” they are actually ADVOCATING sales without background checks.

                        Just want everyone clear on EXACTLY what the cons ultimately want - NO checks on people like themselves .
                        ^^^^ A lib that hasn't got a clue what he's talking about.

                        First - the myth of the "gun show loophole"

                        Despite what some media commentators have claimed, existing gun laws apply just as much to gun shows as they do to any other place where guns are sold. Since 1938, persons selling firearms have been required to obtain a federal firearms license. If a dealer sells a gun from a storefront, from a room in his home or from a table at a gun show, the rules are exactly the same: he can get authorization from the FBI for the sale only after the FBI runs its “instant” background check (which often takes days to complete). As a result, firearms are the most severely regulated consumer product in the United States — the only product for which FBI permission is required for every single sale.

                        Conversely, people who are not engaged in the business of selling firearms, but who sell firearms from time to time (such as a man who sells a hunting rifle to his brother-in-law), are not required to obtain the federal license required of gun dealers or to call the FBI before completing the sale.

                        Similarly, if a gun collector dies and his widow wants to sell the guns, she does not need a federal firearms license because she is just selling off inherited property and is not “engaged in the business.” And if the widow doesn’t want to sell her deceased husband’s guns by taking out a classified ad in the newspaper, it is lawful for her to rent a table at a gun show and sell the entire collection.

                        If you walk along the aisles at any gun show, you will find that the overwhelming majority of guns offered for sale are from federally licensed dealers. Guns sold by private individuals (such as gun collectors getting rid of a gun or two over the the weekend) are the distinct minority.

                        Yet HCI claims that “25-50 percent of the vendors at most gun shows are unlicensed dealers.” That statistic is true only if one counts vendors who aren’t selling guns (e.g., vendors who are selling books, clothing or accessories) as “unlicensed dealers.”

                        Denver congresswoman Diana DeGette says that 70 percent of guns used in crimes come from gun shows. The true figure is rather different, according to the National Institute of Justice, the research arm of the U.S. Department of Justice. According to an NIJ study released in December 1997 (“Homicide in Eight U.S. Cities,” a report that covers much more than homicide), only 2 percent of criminal guns come from gun shows.


                        https://www.cato.org/publications/co...bout-gun-shows

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Another area where they let politics take over instead of helping the people. Sad.

                          On another note, another member of the DNC has to step down due to "insensitive" term (colored people).

                          I think you need to consider your usage of "brown-skinned" tsk-tsk
                          I’ll see you and raise if it’s just a matter of smacking with embarrassing members of your party ....

                          Domestic battery charges are pending for a Las Vegas–based Republican campaign adviser whose ex-fiancée says he kept her as a sex slave, forcing her to wear a collar in private and submit to sex on demand, according to a new report.
                          Over and over again we see Republican sexual proclivities on display .

                          Voila !

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Amazon has more information on Americans than does Facebook and the owner also runs a political newspaper noted for peddling fake news and being anti-Trump. Hmmm....

                            No problem there, right TMan?
                            Ahhh the amazon attacks .....

                            Bezos IS much younger, richer and thinner than trump isn’t he ?

                            Carry on. 😢 more.

                            😂 😂😂😂😂

                            Keep tilting Don Quixote - although the poorly educated don’t know what I’m talking about

                            😂😂😂😂😂😂

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              And I’m telling you that the rust belt and Bible Belt don’t define all the considerations we need to make as we move forward ....

                              Tough love but those folks need to realize that extraction industries and low margin manufacturing are so 30-50 years ago and that they need to get with the new century as states like ours do.
                              Tell that to India and China.

                              Let them eat cake!

                              Comment


                                And keep 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

                                Republicans in Tennessee have reason to worry about a U.S. senate seat after a poll showed that Rep. Marsh Blackburn (R) is behind by double digits.

                                The Tennessean first reported on Thursday that a Middle Tennessee State University poll found that Blackburn is trailing former Democratic Gov. Phil Bredesen by a 10-point margin.

                                Forty-five percent of respondents told pollsters that they favored Bredesen, while 35 percent preferred Blackburn.
                                Oh cons.....don’t ever change

                                😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X