Announcement

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2017, 03:27 PM

Think about this statement.

"If Trump has the economy rolling in 2020, he'll get re-elected. I don't care what the current numbers are. If Trump doesn't have the economy rolling in 2020, he has a problem."

And Democrats are willing to do whatever it takes to make sure Trump is not reelected.

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2017, 04:14 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Whose fault was it the last time? Certainly wasn't the majority party taking the blame? Which is why nothing you or the liberal media says any more is given any credence.

The party that takes the hostages is the one at fault.

Easy

**Unregistered** · 04-23-2017, 04:43 PM

Maxine Waters for President? I love it!
Al Franken for VP? DNC, please make it so!

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 04:59 AM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Think about this statement.

"If Trump has the economy rolling in 2020, he'll get re-elected. I don't care what the current numbers are. If Trump doesn't have the economy rolling in 2020, he has a problem."

And Democrats are willing to do whatever it takes to make sure Trump is not reelected.

So in other words Democrats will do what they can to keep the economy from rolling. Yes, I agree with that point.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 05:10 AM

Yah sure, the Democratic Party is completely unified.

Earlier Sunday morning on CNN, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) said clearly that people can be members of the Democratic Party "as long as they are prepared to back the law, Roe vs. Wade, prepared to back women�s rights as we�ve defined them under the law."

Also on Sunday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said the opposite: "Of course" you can be a pro-life Democrat, Pelosi said. "I've served in the House with many members who did not share my very positive, aggressive position on promoting a woman's right to choose."

BTW TeeHeeMan, you need to watch this - MSNBC Panel: Is Democratic 'Unity Tour' Tearing The Party Apart?

https://youtu.be/iKVeqllODyM

While I disagree wholeheartedly with Sanders economic philosophy, Krystal Ball (who names their kids that???) nails it in this interview, but obviously nobody agrees with her. Fine by me because Dems will keep having the success they've had because they don't.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 06:42 AM

Democrats democrats democrats

So abstract

Here's an easy one

Why did WH announce a dinner with SC then abruptly postpone indefinitely .....

Think some of them were unwilling to break bread with a future litigant in front of the court?

Tee hee

Bwa ha ha

Announcements like that just point to the sheer CHAOS within.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 09:19 AM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Democrats democrats democrats

So abstract

Here's an easy one

Why did WH announce a dinner with SC then abruptly postpone indefinitely .....

Think some of them were unwilling to break bread with a future litigant in front of the court?

Tee hee

Bwa ha ha

Announcements like that just point to the sheer CHAOS within.

Or they point out your heavily biased and warped view of the world. Any number of reasons to postpone...but you always look to fit your agenda with any announcement.
It's called having a closed mind.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 12:12 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Democrats democrats democrats

So abstract

Here's an easy one

Why did WH announce a dinner with SC then abruptly postpone indefinitely .....

Think some of them were unwilling to break bread with a future litigant in front of the court?

Tee hee

Bwa ha ha

Announcements like that just point to the sheer CHAOS within.

Whose cares? Nobody.

Trump maybe nominating a second justice this summer if rumors are true. If Ginsburg doesn't last he may have a third. But TeeHeeMan is focused on dinners. Now THAT is what I call hilarious.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 12:29 PM

Salena Zito writes for the New Post, the Atlantic and others. She was one of the few journalists who understood Trump could win. Why? Because unlike the elitists that never venture out of their Ivory Towers, Zito traveled the Lincoln Highway from Appalachia to the Rockies during the fall interviewing Americans. At that time she wrote in an article for the Atlantic that Trump supporters didn't take what Trump said literally, but did take what he said seriously. That's just the opposite of the press who took what Trump said literally, but not seriously. Zito wrote another article for the Post last week based on a return trip on the Lincoln Highway interviewing many of the same people from the fall. She basically found that Trump�s supporters have not changed their opinions and for many it has been strengthened. She writes:

"Trump�s supporters are unfazed that a new health-care law is not in place (yet), thrilled with the appointment of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, weary of the constant accusations of his ties to Russia, supportive of his strike against Syria for using chemical weapons against its people and dismayed that House Republicans and Democrats are unwilling to compromise. To them, the president remains disruptive, unconventional, defiant and willing to change his mind � appealing attributes to his supporters, but not so to the press."

If Democrats think they will be able to undermine that support with the BS they've been shoveling, they are sadly mistaken.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 12:54 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Salena Zito writes for the New Post, the Atlantic and others. She was one of the few journalists who understood Trump could win. Why? Because unlike the elitists that never venture out of their Ivory Towers, Zito traveled the Lincoln Highway from Appalachia to the Rockies during the fall interviewing Americans. At that time she wrote in an article for the Atlantic that Trump supporters didn't take what Trump said literally, but did take what he said seriously. That's just the opposite of the press who took what Trump said literally, but not seriously. Zito wrote another article for the Post last week based on a return trip on the Lincoln Highway interviewing many of the same people from the fall. She basically found that Trump�s supporters have not changed their opinions and for many it has been strengthened. She writes:

"Trump�s supporters are unfazed that a new health-care law is not in place (yet), thrilled with the appointment of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, weary of the constant accusations of his ties to Russia, supportive of his strike against Syria for using chemical weapons against its people and dismayed that House Republicans and Democrats are unwilling to compromise. To them, the president remains disruptive, unconventional, defiant and willing to change his mind � appealing attributes to his supporters, but not so to the press."

If Democrats think they will be able to undermine that support with the BS they've been shoveling, they are sadly mistaken.

Larry's ivory tower is a dark, musty smelling basement.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 12:57 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Democrats democrats democrats

So abstract

Here's an easy one

Why did WH announce a dinner with SC then abruptly postpone indefinitely .....

Think some of them were unwilling to break bread with a future litigant in front of the court?

Tee hee

Bwa ha ha

Announcements like that just point to the sheer CHAOS within.

Chaffetz, Chaffetz, Chaffetz

Bwahaha!

TeeHeeMan, since you are so focused on Chaffetz, perhaps you might want to talk about the death threats aimed at him AND his wife and children.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 01:09 PM

Bwahaha!

I can hardly wait to hear TeeHeeMan 's comment on this one (like he's actually going to comment. More likely find some other off topic issue to bring up.

Two-thirds of Americans think that the Democratic Party is out of touch with the country

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.44cb2b41d23a

"the Democratic Party is viewed as more out of touch than either Trump or the party�s political opponents. Two-thirds of Americans think the Democrats are out of touch � including nearly half of Democrats themselves."

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 01:10 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Chaffetz, Chaffetz, Chaffetz

Bwahaha!

TeeHeeMan, since you are so focused on Chaffetz, perhaps you might want to talk about the death threats aimed at him AND his wife and children.

The tolerant left in action.

**Unregistered** · 04-24-2017, 03:48 PM

"Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment." - Howard Dean

"I feel like this is the liberals' version of book burning, and it's got to stop. Howard Dean tweeted ...*about this: 'Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment.' Yes it is! Threats are not protected by the First Amendment. This is why the Supreme Court said the Nazis could march in Skokie. They're a hateful bunch �*but that's what the First Amendment means. It doesn't mean just shut up, and agree with me." - Bill Maher

**Unregistered** · 04-25-2017, 09:07 AM

According to The Washington Post and NBC news, late this afternoon Trump signaled that he is giving in and will either accept non-wall money and pretend it�s like a wall or just give the whole thing up entirely and try again in the fall, which likely means never.

Who told you MONTHS ago there would be no wall and Mexico would not pay a cent. The rubes in this country might still clap but you do realize how WEAK he is.