Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Let's quote nutter Peter king....do you like him better boris


http://observer.com/2017/03/peter-ki...onal-security/

If you are NOT a Russian you are a very stupid stupid man. Even nutter Peter king gets it, although to his credit he's actually seemed sober lately.

[Unregistered]

Zilch???

- Exposed the lies the Obama administration put forth to save an election.

- Exposed the incompetence of both Obama and Hillary that lead to the deaths of 4 Americans.

- Exposed that the Obama administration was gun running to Syria

- Exposed the fact that Hillary was using unsecured server for communications that included classified material.

Aside from that - zilch. Ya right, zilch.

That shyte help her lose the election, you idiot.

Nothing actionable or illegal . That's why what trump is up to will get him impeached. That's where this started moron and yes I agree since gowdy' dig and pony shownwas clearly enough to hurt politically, by same measure trump will now be led absolutely out slowly and whenever GOP can take no more impeachment

[Unregistered]

"Can this country afford to have a prez under investigation by the FBI? Think of the trauma that would do to this country" -- Marco Rubio, 11/1/16

What say you nutters?

That the "investigation", according to the FBI on October 31, 2016, 8 days before the election, showed no evidence of the any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

That the "investigation", according to the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee in February, 2017, showed no evidence of the any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

That the "investigation", according to the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the CIA in March, 2017, showed no evidence of the any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

But a Democrat lead administration felt an FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was warranted.

You can try to rewrite history, but it changes nothing.

That's what I think

[Unregistered]

If lying about a BJ is impeachable I would think trumps many lies are just paving the way ....

Slandering Obama like that LIE!

[Unregistered]

That the "investigation", according to the FBI on October 31, 2016, 8 days before the election, showed no evidence of the any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

That the "investigation", according to the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee in February, 2017, showed no evidence of the any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

That the "investigation", according to the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the CIA in March, 2017, showed no evidence of the any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

But a Democrat lead administration felt an FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was warranted.

You can try to rewrite history, but it changes nothing.

That's what I think

Yestersay the house GOP intelligence chair said "dark cloud hangs over presidency" so catch up. Investigation has been ONGOING

Bwa ha ha

[Unregistered]

BTW house GOP doesn't have votes to repeal. Pres , house and senate and STILL can't govern.

SAD!

WEAK!

How does my boot feel kicking your a z z Boris?

Let me know when you want more

Unless you are having all the win you want

[Unregistered]

We know that gowdy accepted money from anti-Hillary pacs and then yestersay carried water for trump.

Gonna bite.

Bwahahaha!

And who were the Democrats who spoke carrying water for?

Democratic representative after Democratic representative used his or her time to deliver little sermons on the perfidy of Donald Trump and various people associated with his campaign or administration. Anyone who actually watched notice how Comey and Rogers declined to answer the stupid questions put to them by Democrats?

At least Gowdy sounded intelligent and actually interested in getting answers, which Comey and Rogers willingly gave to him.

[Unregistered]

Hardly true and now that Americans are PAYING for wall they know who is lying .

Some republicans (those who feel they can hold seats on own ) will abandon soon. LOOK OUT BELOW!

How low can he sink ?

Trumpcare just makes people LAUGH

Bwahahaha!

TeeHeeMan who has yet to be right about his own party thinks he knows how Republicans think???

Oh man! That has to be the funniest post to date!!!

Bwahahaha!

[Unregistered]

Trumpcare may not even get by the house. Already know DOA in senate.

FAIL.

Boris isn't crowing about holding exec , senate and house anymore

Governing very very hard for GOP

This one's a keeper to post after it passes. And it will pass.

[Unregistered]

[QUOTE=Unregistered;2009466]You asked - NEWSWEEK

March 21, 2017
Jeff Stein
Posted with permission from Newsweek
Republish
Reprint
It was like a decomposed corpse washing up on the river bank during a massive flood. It came in the form of a brief, cryptic tweet in the whoosh of running online commentary on FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee: “After my sister visited Paul Manafort's hometown as part of her investigation: attempted home break-in, her phone/comp. Hacked, car trashed 2x.”

You had to be at least a part-time detective on the Trump-Russia beat to get the clues. The name of the tweeter, Andrea Chalupa, rang a bell. I looked her up. The sister she referenced was Alexandra, an operative for the Democratic National Committee who in 2015 had begun digging into the affairs of Donald Trump’s campaign chairman at the time, Paul Manafort. Since the bigtime D.C. lobbyist for developing world kleptocracies was close to pro-Russia elements in Ukraine, Chalupa began to suspect Moscow would have some sort of connection to the Trump campaign. She didn’t pay much attention at first, because Trump’s campaign was just a clown show. But then he got traction and she looked again. And then came the suspected Russian hacks of the DNC, including her own email account. Even stranger things began to happen, as her sister’s tweeted shorthand reminded everyone on Monday afternoon.

Yes, there had been an “attempted home break-in” last year, in her leafy, virtually crime-free neighborhood of northwest Washington, D.C., as Politico’s Kenneth P. Vogel and David Stern reported in January. Her iPhone was hacked, too, and a death-metal track popular in Russia appeared on her playlist. Her car was broken into and trashed twice, with nothing stolen. The second time, the burglar left a red, traditional Ukrainian blouse draped across the back seat. She reported the incidents to the D.C. police and FBI, which by then had opened a counterintelligence investigation into Russian subversion. No arrests have been made.

Related: FBI Director Comey confirms probe into possible Trump-Russia ties

More strange things have happened since, to her and some of her friends, that she’s not ready to go public about. But she did say that, like virtually everyone else in official Washington, she was glued to the TV Monday for the House Intelligence Committee hearing on Moscow’s campaign to destroy Hillary Clinton, put Donald Trump in the White House and rattle Americans’ faith in their core institutions. Over five and a half hours, the star witness of the astonishing event, FBI Director James Comey, absolutely obliterated the credibility of the increasingly unhinged president of the United States.

Chalupa was heartened, she told Newsweek. The hearing “demonstrated the strength of the U.S. government. It was wonderful to watch members of Congress on both sides of the aisle working in partnership with the intelligence community to address an unprecedented national security issue.”

That last part was generous. Many of the Republicans on the panel gave faint praise to the FBI’s pursuit of Russian subversion, and to Comey’s inalterable declaration that the Russians “wanted to hurt our democracy, hurt her”—Hillary Clinton—and “help him”—Trump. But the diehards in the GOP wanted to talk about leaks, not the substance of them.


Comey and his fellow intelligence chief at the witness table, National Security Agency (NSA) Director Michael Rogers, ritually denounced the leaking of classified information as a crime—and no doubt they mean it in the wake of Edward Snowden’s massive theft and Wikileaks' “weaponization” of other stolen documents.

But they served up helping after helping of Russian subversion to Democrats hungry for vindication. Vladimir Putin, Comey said of the murderous Russian kleptocrat, “hated Clinton so much…he wanted Trump to win.”

One Republican on the panel, Mike Conaway of Texas, asked Comey how he could be so sure the Russians were for Trump. “Logic,” Comey answered, stifling a smirk. If they were against Clinton, who’d pressed a hard line against Putin’s multi-pronged “hybrid war” against Europe and repression of dissidents at home, that meant they were for Trump, whose ties to Russian oligarchs led the Kremlin to think it might get a better deal. At first the Russians “focused on undermining her presidency,” which until Election Day looked like a cinch, Comey said. Trump’s victory was an unexpected bonus.

Lest any Trump supporter hope the feds were through with him after the election, Comey relieved them of that illusion, too. The FBI, he said, was continuing to investigate “the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts.”

Translation: The bureau is conducting an open-ended counterintelligence investigation into whether any of Trump’s associates collluded with the Russians. The FBI generally does not open an investigation, much less continue one, unless there’s evidence of a possible crime. And unlike criminal investigations, which generally require indictments from grand juries at some point, the FBI’s counterintelligence probe of Russian subversion and Trump’s associates could remain open for months, even years. Comey also said the FBI will conduct “an assessment of whether any crimes were committed.”

The upshot: Barring some unforeseen development, the Trump White House will feel the drip, drip, drip of the bureau’s multiple probes for its entire time in office. No doubt the leaks have just begun.

The president might be wise to negotiate a resignation before he’s fatally wounded. Comey and Rogers slashed him so badly on Monday, with their emphatic eviscerations of his infamous tweets claiming President Barack Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower, that his credibility on any issue, outside his adoring legions of cult-like fans, has been nearly destroyed. At some point, the Republicans may see their own salvation lies in deserting him for Vice President Mike Pence.

Comey and Rogers were clear. There is “no information that supports those tweets and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,” Comey said. And the G-man emphasized he was speaking with the authorization of the president’s own Justice Department, which had asked him “to share” its finding that “the department has no information that supports those tweets.”

The NSA’s Rogers, resplendent in his admiral’s uniform, bristled as he leaned into the microphone to destroy another empty assertion by the president, that Obama had asked British eavesdroppers to help intercept Trump’s communications.

“I’ve seen nothing on the NSA side that we engaged in any such activity, nor that anyone ever asked us to engage in such activity,” Rogers said. He seemed personally offended that the president had slandered America’s closest ally, which had denounced Trump’s tweets as “nonsense and utterly ridiculous.”

Yet Trump refused to bow, even in the face of Comey’s blunt-force blows to his presidency. From the Oval Office at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, he dispatched an increasingly desperate-sounding froth of denials into the Twittersphere along the lines of, “Who you going to believe—me or your lyin’ eyes?” That classic Chico Marx line (from the 1933 classic, Duck Soup) would have fit the bizarre day well.

As the hours ground on, one Republican after another complained that the investigations of U.S. intelligence agencies had left “a cloud over this administration,” as Representative Mike Turner of Ohio put it. Of course, that cloud was entirely of Team Trump’s making.

Back across town, Alexandra Chalupa was hoping investigators will keep drilling into the many and complex layers of Russian subversion on Trump’s behalf. The burgeoning scandal is so grave nobody has dared to hang a “-gate” on it. Watergate really was a third-rate burglary compared to what became apparent on Monday: Moscow’s hijacking of the 2016 election, with the possible collusion of its occupants.

“Important concerns were raised” in Monday’s hearing, Chalupa told Newsweek, carefully choosing her words. But she’d really like the FBI to catch the people who hacked her phone, twice broke into her car, tried to get into her house and continue to threaten her and her friends today.

Just like in Watergate, capturing the thugs could well unravel the plot.

Former CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson is suing the U.S. Department of Justice and the Postal Service for the alleged "unauthorized and illegal surveillance" of her laptops and telephones between 2011 and 2013.....In her book, she wrote, "Can you really turn to the Justice Department's FBI when the Justice Department might be part of the plot?"

[Unregistered]

Let's quote nutter Peter king....do you like him better boris


http://observer.com/2017/03/peter-ki...onal-security/

If you are NOT a Russian you are a very stupid stupid man. Even nutter Peter king gets it, although to his credit he's actually seemed sober lately.

It won't. Peter King is wrong.

[Unregistered]

Nothing actionable or illegal . That's why what trump is up to will get him impeached. That's where this started moron and yes I agree since gowdy' dig and pony shownwas clearly enough to hurt politically, by same measure trump will now be led absolutely out slowly and whenever GOP can take no more impeachment

Bwahaha!

Thanks to ***** and Bill's conversation about golf and grandchildren on an obscure Arizona tarmac.

[Unregistered]

Yestersay the house GOP intelligence chair said "dark cloud hangs over presidency" so catch up. Investigation has been ONGOING

Bwa ha ha

No shyte, thanks to Democrats and their water carrying media who continue to try to make a story where there is none.

I'm glad the investigation is ongoing. Whoever “unmasked” Mike Flynn’s name and leaked it to the press must be pi$$ing their pants right now because if caught it's 10 years in the slammer. As Comey and Rogers confirmed yesterday it's only 12 to 20 people who could have been responsible.

[Unregistered]

BTW house GOP doesn't have votes to repeal. Pres , house and senate and STILL can't govern.

SAD!

WEAK!

How does my boot feel kicking your a z z Boris?

Let me know when you want more

Unless you are having all the win you want

Bwahahaha!

Another keeper!

It will be passed TeeHeeMan, it will be passed.

Because if it isn't, a lot of people will be screwed when Obamacare completely fails as it will.

That's why Dems are desperate to have it fixed. If it fails it will all be on them.

[Unregistered]

Bwahahaha!

Really TeeHeeMan, you are so dismissive of the rape of a 14 year old girl? What kind of illiberal are you anyway??? If this was the crime of a white male you and your illiberal friends would be all over it.

illiberals = hypocrites

I am not TeeHeeMan because he is an obvious troll who is clearly jerking your chain. But you can't judge 12 million people on the actions of two kids. And if we are speaking of hypocracy, you seem pretty comfortable with a president who has been accused of sexual assault.