Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

The only one undermining anything are the Democrats. They are doing everything within their power to undermine the peaceful transition of power, the bedrock of this country's government. And then they wonder why the party is being slaughtered at every level come election time. Even the liberals on MSNBC get it now that Zucker has moved on to CNN.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sPgRouesDLQ

[Unregistered]

To the extent that any "goals" have been scored (votes) Clinton has "scored" more.

We have a system where the person who scored most goals can lose. Fine. But the one with more points will be and that's why trump is undermined every way he turns.

Good luck with president piñata ! We will see if you get what he promised or coal in your stocking lol

Nope. Electoral college votes are the only goals here. You want to discuss pretty passes and corner kicks. Trying to change the rules and the scoring system. You lost. Stop making excuses.

[Unregistered]

It's like Patriots fans still thinking they had the best team in history after going 18-0 and losing when it mattered most. Giants won the SB that year, that's all that really matters.

[Unregistered]

"You've got a situation where they're not only entire states but also big chunks of states where, if we're not showing up, if we're not in there making an argument, then we're going to lose," Obama told NPR. "And we can lose badly, and that's what happened in this election."

Hear that, Tee Hee??

Lose.

Badly.

His words, not mine.

[Unregistered]

Just watched a TED presentation by Sharyl Attkinsson this morning and although it wasn't on politics, it was a lesson on how the media message is manipulated. At the end of the presentation she gave 5 points as to what to look out for when attempting to discern the actual from the manufactured. As I listened all I could think of was TeeHeeMan's posts. Which brings me to the point of the Russians hacking to sway the election in Trumps favor, there being no verifiable evidence of that. In fact what evidence there is seems to contradict that.

No one would disagree that the Russians are employing cyber warfare against the US. So are the Chinese. So aren't a number of countries. In fact the US does it as well. Remember the Stuxnet virus? How about the hacking of Angela Merkel's phone? The issue is whether there was intent on the part of the Russians to get Trump elected. That's pretty far out there when there is no evidence that it was the Russians hacking the DNC in the first place.

Friday, 16 December 2016

Former British Ambassador: Russia Not the WikiLeaks Source

A former British ambassador who is now an operative for WikiLeaks says that the leaked DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails and documents were not hacked by the Russian government, as claimed by the CIA. In fact, he says the leaked documents were not hacked at all. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks,” former ambassador Craig Murray said in a recent interview with the*Daily Mail.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/c...kileaks-source

Israeli Intelligence Debunks Notion of Russia Hacking DNC Emails

July 31, 2016

A former British ambassador who is now an operative for WikiLeaks says that the leaked DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails and documents were not hacked by the Russian government, as claimed by the CIA. In fact, he says the leaked documents were not hacked at all. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks,” former ambassador Craig Murray said in a recent interview with the*Daily Mail.

[Unregistered]

It's like Patriots fans still thinking they had the best team in history after going 18-0 and losing when it mattered most. Giants won the SB that year, that's all that really matters.

Time to close this thread down. HC is gone. Trump is President. Republicans control every aspect of Government.

Game over. Move on.

[Unregistered]

Time to close this thread down. HC is gone. Trump is President. Republicans control every aspect of Government.

Game over. Move on.

Almost. Michelle Obama talks with Oprah tonight . Then it is over .

[Unregistered]

Almost. Michelle Obama talks with Oprah tonight . Then it is over .

Michelle and Oprah...porn for Larry.

[Unregistered]

Not sure, but I think I'm agreeing with you somewhat. The Clintons were the most powerful people associated with the Democratic party. And, rightfully so based on they prior experiences. So, like it or not, she was in charge. She disregarded Bernie's electorate. She disregarded the other party. She disregarded anything that didn't point to her coronation.

She failed, to get her party behind her. There's always influences and reasons why for that failure, but it's her failure nonetheless.

BernieMan is not in the Democratic party. She included many of his positions after he lost by 4 million votes. He continued to run independently and not endorse her.

Again, look at the drumpf. his little stoolies fell into line. Liberals are just too anarchic to band together. Serves you guys right for being such independent tools.

[Unregistered]

"You've got a situation where they're not only entire states but also big chunks of states where, if we're not showing up, if we're not in there making an argument, then we're going to lose," Obama told NPR. "And we can lose badly, and that's what happened in this election."

.

Feckless.

I now see what they were talking about for the past 8 years.

Throwing his flock to the masses. Thanks for NOTHING!

[Unregistered]

BernieMan is not in the Democratic party. She included many of his positions after he lost by 4 million votes. He continued to run independently and not endorse her.

Again, look at the drumpf. his little stoolies fell into line. Liberals are just too anarchic to band together. Serves you guys right for being such independent tools.

"I have come here to make it as clear as possible why I am endorsing Hillary Clinton and why she must become our next president," Sanders said at a joint rally here. "Secretary Clinton has won the Democratic nomination and I congratulate her for that."

[Unregistered]

BernieMan is not in the Democratic party. She included many of his positions after he lost by 4 million votes. He continued to run independently and not endorse her.

Again, look at the drumpf. his little stoolies fell into line. Liberals are just too anarchic to band together. Serves you guys right for being such independent tools.

Not exactly.

The Democrats of recent times were coast to coast, but leaving out the middle. They adhered to the victims , the elitist, Academia , Hollywood, etc. They were unable to unify under a coherent directed strategy. Trump was heard by a larger cross section, and was able to appeal to those in key states , states where Republicans in the past had might as well be speaking another language. The Dems got beaten badly. They have not been as weak as they are today in nearly a century.

[Unregistered]

20 times more climate tipping - cow farts

What's that saying? If the US was a game board, all the lose marbles would roll to California.

Ya, I think there are a lot of nutjobs in CA. Who else would be legislating cow farts?

Bwahahahaha!

Here’s the kicker: methane, the gas produced extensively by the livestock industry worldwide, traps up to 100 times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide within a 5 year period, and 72 times more within a 20 year period.

Chase that on the ole grill n beer.

[Unregistered]

just sayin

Not exactly.

The Democrats of recent times were coast to coast, but leaving out the middle. They adhered to the victims , the elitist, Academia , Hollywood, etc. They were unable to unify under a coherent directed strategy. Trump was heard by a larger cross section, and was able to appeal to those in key states , states where Republicans in the past had might as well be speaking another language. The Dems got beaten badly. They have not been as weak as they are today in nearly a century.

How can this be validated when he lost by 3 million votes in the country?

You are deluding yourself if you believe Dems lost "bad" -

66M = HRC 63M = trump 55M didn't vote - or voted for someone else.

Don't see the "bad" in the numbers

[Unregistered]

How can this be validated when he lost by 3 million votes in the country?

You are deluding yourself if you believe Dems lost "bad" -

66M = HRC 63M = trump 55M didn't vote - or voted for someone else.

Don't see the "bad" in the numbers

OK, so let me summarize:

PRES: REPUBLICAN
HOUSE: REPUBLICAN
SENATE: REPUBLICAN