Announcement

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 09:35 AM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

No comment by cons about the WHITE racist who killed a couple police officers. No comment at all. Typical

What is there to say ? Only Progressives try and spin anything and everything to get traction. And you post is just that, an attempt to spin it favorably for Progressives

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 09:38 AM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Yeah, if he had been anything other than White they'd be going totally bananas right now. Especially if he had been Black.

If he were black, we'd be hearing all about how they are targeted, cops are evil, they eat donuts and drive too fast, they're out to get me.

But, since he wasn't, silence.

Boy, that hypocrisy totally blew up in your face....

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 10:18 AM

Whispers of "payback" are being directed at Hillary Clinton after she decried as "unprecedented" the surprise FBI revival of its probe of her email scandal.

That's because 24 years ago, as former President George H.W. Bush was surging back against challenger Bill Clinton, a special prosecutor raised new charges against Bush in the Iran-Contra probe, prompting Clinton to claim he was running against a "culture of corruption."

Many Republicans claimed that the indictment made by special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh against former Reagan-era Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger the weekend before the 1992 election cost Bush a second term. The indictment, later thrown out, challenged Bush's claim that he did not know about a controversial arms-for-hostages deal that dogged the Reagan-Bush administration.

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 10:30 AM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

If he were black, we'd be hearing all about how they are targeted, cops are evil, they eat donuts and drive too fast, they're out to get me.

But, since he wasn't, silence.

Boy, that hypocrisy totally blew up in your face....

You should try making at least a little bit of sense when you post, Nutter.

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 10:44 AM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

You should try making at least a little bit of sense when you post, Nutter.

Coming from the side that posts the most nonsensical things I've ever seen, that's pretty rich...

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 11:38 AM

James Comey cut his teeth as a staff lawyer for Ken Starr's morality play witch hunt in the 90's.

As the post once said

"That is all ye know and all you need to know"

Guess who?

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 11:55 AM

Poet once said ....lol

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 12:03 PM

Comey: "Not criminal activity" Dems cheer, Repubs whine.

Comey: "Whoa, wait a minute, just found something new" Dems whine, Repubs cheer.

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 12:13 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Whispers of "payback" are being directed at Hillary Clinton after she decried as "unprecedented" the surprise FBI revival of its probe of her email scandal.

That's because 24 years ago, as former President George H.W. Bush was surging back against challenger Bill Clinton, a special prosecutor raised new charges against Bush in the Iran-Contra probe, prompting Clinton to claim he was running against a "culture of corruption."

Many Republicans claimed that the indictment made by special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh against former Reagan-era Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger the weekend before the 1992 election cost Bush a second term. The indictment, later thrown out, challenged Bush's claim that he did not know about a controversial arms-for-hostages deal that dogged the Reagan-Bush administration.

There would be no need for " payback" had HRC not have been to cavalier and daring regarding her setting up the servers.

This is your modern Democratic Party . This is their leader. Setting up her own system , the fix was in on the Nomination from the start, CNN having a plant slipping questions in the debate , all brought on by their actions. Calculated and planned.

And now the crying about the FBI getting politically involved. Hint" They are ONLY involved because of HRC's actions. Multiple date devices. multiple users, missing E Mails , bleached E Mails , leaked E Mails blamed on some Rusky plot....
Fifth Amendment. " I don't recall " on and on.

IF HRC had to stand up and be treated like any ordinary American, there would have been a Grand Jury. No lawyers to shield her from questioning. Placed under Oath, she would be forced to tell the truth or take the Fifth. She was handled with kid gloves from the start, " interviewed" on a Holiday weekend.

If a Grand Jury would have been formed, all of this would have surfaced regarding the E Mails . No instruments would have been " destroyed" per agreement. No immunity would have been given unless there was full testimony under oath.

The fix was in from the start, just like the buildup to the Nomination. But a slick pervert got in the way.....

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 12:42 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

There would be no need for " payback" had HRC not have been to cavalier and daring regarding her setting up the servers.

This is your modern Democratic Party . This is their leader. Setting up her own system , the fix was in on the Nomination from the start, CNN having a plant slipping questions in the debate , all brought on by their actions. Calculated and planned.

And now the crying about the FBI getting politically involved. Hint" They are ONLY involved because of HRC's actions. Multiple date devices. multiple users, missing E Mails , bleached E Mails , leaked E Mails blamed on some Rusky plot....
Fifth Amendment. " I don't recall " on and on.

IF HRC had to stand up and be treated like any ordinary American, there would have been a Grand Jury. No lawyers to shield her from questioning. Placed under Oath, she would be forced to tell the truth or take the Fifth. She was handled with kid gloves from the start, " interviewed" on a Holiday weekend.

If a Grand Jury would have been formed, all of this would have surfaced regarding the E Mails . No instruments would have been " destroyed" per agreement. No immunity would have been given unless there was full testimony under oath.

The fix was in from the start, just like the buildup to the Nomination. But a slick pervert got in the way.....

"cavalier and daring" ?????

She did exactly what the previous administration did - that is exactly the opposite of daring - it is following established protocol.

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 12:50 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/02/us/mis...ump/index.html

I DENOUNCE THIS!!!

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 01:05 PM

democrats probably did it. they have a history of these kind of actions.

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 01:09 PM

black vote down... burn a church and spray paint vote trump on it

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 01:18 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Comey: "Not criminal activity" Dems cheer, Repubs whine.

Comey: "Whoa, wait a minute, just found something new" Dems whine, Repubs cheer.

Wrong - it wasn't "just found something new" - it is a might-maybe-if we squint hard enough shrodinger's cat of a something we haven't even looked at yet of a something.

**Unregistered** · 11-02-2016, 01:22 PM

Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

Wrong - it wasn't "just found something new" - it is a might-maybe-if we squint hard enough shrodinger's cat of a something we haven't even looked at yet of a something.

OK, then we can go with "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information" since you seem to want to be stickler for the details.

Face it...all was great with him when he said that. Now, notsoooomuch.

Typical hypo.