Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    ^^ Called a "deflection". Right out of the manual.

    Meanwhile, as I walk by the TV, I see a quote with Obamamama speaking on the LA floods: "The Nation prays with you".

    What he also said, I think, if you can read his lips but not audible, was "They were also praying for me to make that tricky little downhill eight-footer so I could salvage par."

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      No, numbnuts. It's about a party's nomination for the highest office in the land, and who's major platform is a champion of women's rights, took a direct action to remove support for women who have been victimized.

      Completely hypocritical, but of course, being a hypocrite, you can't see that.
      Name calling? Getting testy aren't you

      We could have some of the conversation you want had the the "base" nominated. SAne person. Would be winning IMHO if you nominated any of these others who would STILL appease white nationalist base. But trump was wanted because the right wanted someone who hated on the left and would deliver a you know what kicking

      Fine you got it. You aroused the opposition elections have consequences so open up and say "aaah"

      Btw 16 points in VA notn15 deskew that

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Name calling? Getting testy aren't you

        We could have some of the conversation you want had the the "base" nominated. SAne person. Would be winning IMHO if you nominated any of these others who would STILL appease white nationalist base. But trump was wanted because the right wanted someone who hated on the left and would deliver a you know what kicking

        Fine you got it. You aroused the opposition elections have consequences so open up and say "aaah"

        Btw 16 points in VA notn15 deskew that
        I'd try to reply to all, but can't understand most of it. So, referencing this part only:

        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        But trump was wanted because the right wanted someone who hated on the left and would deliver a you know what kicking
        I believe you are 100% correct. That party elected the wrong person, and it will cost them.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          ^^ Called a "deflection". Right out of the manual.

          Meanwhile, as I walk by the TV, I see a quote with Obamamama speaking on the LA floods: "The Nation prays with you".

          What he also said, I think, if you can read his lips but not audible, was "They were also praying for me to make that tricky little downhill eight-footer so I could salvage par."
          Look at the nutter dance for us in all the expected ways!

          Obama has hundreds of days left till he totals days of bush vacation plus retreats at camp David ....or till he get to Eisenhower (republican yes and his 800 rounds of golf. Woodrow Wilson played 1100 by the way ....forget but republican?)

          Look at the petty little hater blowing up over Obama golf etx when republicans candudTes associates help Putin take Crimea and they don't care.

          Nutters focus on and say the strangest things !

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Look at the nutter dance for us in all the expected ways!

            Obama has hundreds of days left till he totals days of bush vacation plus retreats at camp David ....or till he get to Eisenhower (republican yes and his 800 rounds of golf. Woodrow Wilson played 1100 by the way ....forget but republican?)

            Look at the petty little hater blowing up over Obama golf etx when republicans candudTes associates help Putin take Crimea and they don't care.

            Nutters focus on and say the strangest things !
            Look at the lefty's complaining about Bush's worst moment of his presidency...when his worst moment was topped by Obama!!

            Dance, lefty, dance!!

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              I'd try to reply to all, but can't understand most of it. So, referencing this part only:



              I believe you are 100% correct. That party elected the wrong person, and it will cost them.
              Yes there is a civil war isn't there?

              Like bush and rice said elections have consequences and political capital earned by winning is going to be spent .....

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Look at the lefty's complaining about Bush's worst moment of his presidency...when his worst moment was topped by Obama!!

                Dance, lefty, dance!!
                You wish.

                The winning side here isn't dancing and isn't going to. Step aside or be kicked to the curb over time. Have it your way.

                R's won't win another national election under current laws and system. Good luck with that

                Comment


                  Comments on Scott Brown nutters.

                  Seems "clinton - like" what gives? IOKIYAR?

                  Tooooo funnnnyyy

                  And these allegations are made by an educated newswOman from MA not some trailer park trash needing 15 min of fame

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Comments on Scott Brown nutters.

                    Seems "clinton - like" what gives? IOKIYAR?

                    Tooooo funnnnyyy

                    And these allegations are made by an educated newswOman from MA not some trailer park trash needing 15 min of fame

                    OK, so we should amend her statement that all EDUCATED people should be believed.

                    Since we know you have your PhD, are only us troglodytes with Masters to be believed? Bachelors? High School? GED? At what point is someone's education level become relevant, and believable?

                    Comment


                      Seriously nutters how does it fly?

                      Look at the smoke coming out of FOX news, the oracle of the right . Ailes, o'reilly (loofa anyone?) brown execs covering for it

                      But they keep with the Bill Clinton drum beat. Then lecture everyone on hypocrisy ?

                      Almost every day we need just to wait and lay waste to you with real time developing facts on ground.

                      A GOP chairman is in news protesting child rApist friend of Epstein trump.

                      Too much schaudenfreude I must avert my eyes for a bit

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        OK, so we should amend her statement that all EDUCATED people should be believed.

                        Since we know you have your PhD, are only us troglodytes with Masters to be believed? Bachelors? High School? GED? At what point is someone's education level become relevant, and believable?
                        Well the FBI has found people making Clinton allegations like Wiley to have some credibility issues

                        Let's keep eyes on ball here though ......surely Tantaros allegAtions will be greeted by you as at LEAST as credible as those made by a depressed woman under stress in failing marriage whose husband out gun to his own head .....

                        Why you are t a HYPOCRITE are you? So why don't you subject Scottie brown to some of the same loathsome comments you reserve for Clinton.

                        Or do you object to person and NOT the act?


                        Oh boy can't wait for you to explain your seeming contradiction

                        Think Gail's hand is still curious? Of course she's as bad a person as Hillary if she doesn't divorce him tomorrow

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Well the FBI has found people making Clinton allegations like Wiley to have some credibility issues
                          Must be hard if you were victimized to know your President doesn't support you. Even goes so far as to take her statement off her website. Sad.


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

                          Let's keep eyes on ball here though ......surely Tantaros allegAtions will be greeted by you as at LEAST as credible as those made by a depressed woman under stress in failing marriage whose husband out gun to his own head .....
                          Surely they are, and if true...very disappointing to hear of them.

                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post


                          Or do you object to person and NOT the act?
                          Both

                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post


                          Oh boy can't wait for you to explain your seeming contradiction
                          I think you are looking for contradictions, and littered with grammatical errors making it unreadable, I believe you can look at your own follow-up reply, which we are all sure is forthcoming.

                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

                          Think Gail's hand is still curious? Of course she's as bad a person as Hillary if she doesn't divorce him tomorrow
                          Relevance? I just pointed out the hypocritical nature of how we bring up Brown and he's guilty right off the bat...and the only reason appears to be her education level.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Must be hard if you were victimized to know your President doesn't support you. Even goes so far as to take her statement off her website. Sad.




                            Surely they are, and if true...very disappointing to hear of them.



                            Both



                            I think you are looking for contradictions, and littered with grammatical errors making it unreadable, I believe you can look at your own follow-up reply, which we are all sure is forthcoming.



                            Relevance? I just pointed out the hypocritical nature of how we bring up Brown and he's guilty right off the bat...and the only reason appears to be her education level.

                            Last part is the ignorant rube act. Eye not on ball. Nutters off like bats for years of Clinton sexual peccadilloes .....meNwhile their whole house off cards run like a mysogynjzric ....oh just read law suit

                            Basically fox drives Clinton story and if last few weeks haven't led you to question agenda of fox all these years you are a rube?

                            For myself? A woman's husband cheating on her decades ago is no reason to give someone like trump nuke codes. But that's what the right has been pushing for months.

                            Hope that clarifies things in the nutter brain about where I stand

                            Comment


                              I guess one of you should say mYbe you shouldn't have backed Scott brown At least until he comes clean

                              Tee hee
                              Bwa ha ha

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                Last part is the ignorant rube act. Eye not on ball. Nutters off like bats for years of Clinton sexual peccadilloes .....meNwhile their whole house off cards run like a mysogynjzric ....oh just read law suit

                                Basically fox drives Clinton story and if last few weeks haven't led you to question agenda of fox all these years you are a rube?

                                For myself? A woman's husband cheating on her decades ago is no reason to give someone like trump nuke codes. But that's what the right has been pushing for months.

                                Hope that clarifies things in the nutter brain about where I stand
                                From what I can read and understand, I think I agree with you for the most part.

                                Not a nutter, so I'll disregard that.

                                Fox drives lots of stories, some valid some not. Just like many organizations who push their agenda. I don't see where pointing out Hillary is a hypocrite due to her championing of "some" (apparently) women's issues. Certainly I don't want Trump to have nuke codes. Hell, I don't want him to have any codes whatsoever. But, I didn't bring Trump into the conversation, you did.

                                If I see a nutter brain, I'll be sure to let them know where you stand.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X