Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

you are wrong! They are repeat offenders etc and deserve the sentences. Thanks to Bill Clinton enacting excellent crime laws the rate went way down. Why? Because habitual offenders were given lonnng sentences. Should probably just get a pass to old sparky.

Get your head out of the sand.

Love when people post with authority about something they nothing about. How many white college kids have escaped jail time, including for Rape, while blacks are locked up for years on a possession charge?

[Unregistered]

McKesson was President of the student body at Bowdoin. Does that fit with your narrative? Got a similar neo-nazi leader to offer?

Really who cares? Should I be impressed? We've seen the Ivy Leagye produce the Wall Street bankers that almost destroyed the world economy.

[Unregistered]

Let's see. I was assaulted at age 14 by a white "gang" (Concussion)
Assaulted at age 22 by 10 white punks (lost 2 teeth)
Watched my best friend get his arm broken by a baseball bat (age 24) (white ex-con)
Held up at gunpoint working at a drug store at age 32 (whites)

Only the second crime actually made it onto the police logs.

Terrible, sorry for you. That absolutely stinks.

Was this a result of an organized activity through coercion and intimidation for a political cause?

[Unregistered]

As noted before, BLM grew out of a false premise of white cops shooting unarmed black men while at the same time ignoring the black on black violence in their own communities.

Do you need the full list of unarmed black men killed over the past 3-4 years? Taken at large, there is no false premise. You have got to be kidding. Black on black crime IS a problem but why so quick to confuse the issues?

[Unregistered]

Love when people post with authority about something they nothing about. How many white college kids have escaped jail time, including for Rape, while blacks are locked up for years on a possession charge?

wah wah wah

when it's the 35th time... Well Jamal was just turning his life around and was thinking about getting his GED and maybe taking up RAP as an art form.

[Unregistered]

Terrible, sorry for you. That absolutely stinks.

Was this a result of an organized activity through coercion and intimidation for a political cause?

OMG. FYI, another perfect example of being autisticly dumb.

[Unregistered]

No, I want you to answer the questions. And if you were a professor for a course on terrorism I would like to kno how you would describe these different groups and ho you would relate, equate, compare, etc, etc. There is NOTHING fundamentally similar about BLM and ISIS. You have stretched the definition to apply in scenarios that now renders the term absolutely meaningless. And btw, are you suggesting in your challenge above that all violence by definition is terrorist? So you are in fact going to include police brutality as terrorist?

No, for the umpteenth time, I don't consider all violence terrorism. However, if one uses violence to coerce and intimidate for political purposes is, by definition, terrorism.

There isn't, and there shouldn't be, a "scale" which you need to approve to reach that level.

[Unregistered]

OMG. FYI, another perfect example of being autisticly dumb.

So, we've reverted to insults.

Nice talking to ya'.

[Unregistered]

wah wah wah

when it's the 35th time... Well Jamal was just turning his life around and was thinking about getting his GED and maybe taking up RAP as an art form.

Obviously you haven't spent any time in courthouses, jails, and prisons. And some nice overtly racist touches in your post to boot.

[Unregistered]

I am the poster who has been asking if #BLM should be considered domestic terrorists. I am NOT the poster who is relating blacks to crime, nose rings, etc. etc.

Just don't want to confuse any replies.

[Unregistered]

No, for the umpteenth time, I don't consider all violence terrorism. However, if one uses violence to coerce and intimidate for political purposes is, by definition, terrorism.

There isn't, and there shouldn't be, a "scale" which you need to approve to reach that level.

Wow, you really are dumb as a brick. You fell in love with a "definition" that you just keep re-posting and you have yet to provide any qualitative analysis of how you rate these various "terrorist" organizations. Are you suggesting -- all of your posts so far indicate so -- that meeting the definition makes all of them the same, or do you have some method of differentiating? Or can you not do that that because you haven't found the right 'word' yet? And, for the umpteemth time, they aren't using violence ot intimidate. Things getting overheated occasionally, like at a Trump rally, is TOTALLY different than PLANNING to bring jetliners down!

[Unregistered]

No, for the umpteenth time, I don't consider all violence terrorism. However, if one uses violence to coerce and intimidate for political purposes is, by definition, terrorism.

There isn't, and there shouldn't be, a "scale" which you need to approve to reach that level.

So what violence does not count as terrorist for you? And is it somehow different or less "serious" as a result?

[Unregistered]

Wow, you really are dumb as a brick. You fell in love with a "definition" that you just keep re-posting and you have yet to provide any qualitative analysis of how you rate these various "terrorist" organizations. Are you suggesting -- all of your posts so far indicate so -- that meeting the definition makes all of them the same, or do you have some method of differentiating? Or can you not do that that because you haven't found the right 'word' yet? And, for the umpteemth time, they aren't using violence ot intimidate. Things getting overheated occasionally, like at a Trump rally, is TOTALLY different than PLANNING to bring jetliners down!

I'll disregard the insult.

I don't and have never said they are the "same". There's all kinds of levels of violence, and therefore there can and should be all levels of terrorism. Planning on taking a jetliner down vs. planning on looting a store and attacking "the piggly-wigglies" is still planning violence.

"Overheated occasionally". Interested way of putting it.

[Unregistered]

So what violence does not count as terrorist for you? And is it somehow different or less "serious" as a result?

Great question. I would say if it's not an organized activity with the end result to be violent, my opinion would not put it in this category.

The seriousness of it doesn't matter.

[Unregistered]

Obviously you haven't spent any time in courthouses, jails, and prisons. And some nice overtly racist touches in your post to boot.

Obviously you want to decriminalize crime and make it a free for all for our poor urban brothers.

It is working great in NYC. They are doing that now.