Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Don't look now cons but your boy just walked away from his promise to ban muslims. Guess the wall is next. Once again you dupes are going to get the old switcheroo and lose anyway.

What's next, no wall?

[Unregistered]

don't look now cons but your boy just walked away from his promise to ban muslims. Guess the wall is next. Once again you dupes are going to get the old switcheroo and lose anyway.

What's next, no wall?

what difference does it make!

[Unregistered]

Don't look now cons but your boy just walked away from his promise to ban muslims. Guess the wall is next. Once again you dupes are going to get the old switcheroo and lose anyway.

What's next, no wall?

Don't look now libs, your candidate who prattles on about gender inequality pays her female employees at the Clinton Foundation 38% of what the male employees get paid.

[Unregistered]

I assume so as well. It's why I stopped engaging. Controlled discussions to understand viewpoints I do like, but this is far from that. Similar to trying to reason with a 3-year old who just puts his fingers in his ears and screams. Cute at first, but you don't really get anything out of it.

Signed,

Justsomemoron

You nailed it with that post.

[Unregistered]

see that wasn't even me - the perfesser- you were responding to. Someone else jumped in and made a few comments.

tee hee
bwa ha ha

outnumbered in life, outnumbered here....unless you cant your good cop sock puppet as another individual when its you.

you are just mad because I exposed that crap yesterday. Its was so easy too. You really aren't much of a challenge but like I said, I think Im addicted to beating you like a rug.

Wow! Typical of Perspective. Posting 24/7, responding to his own posts, mirroring his behavior on others. I'm surprised you haven't somehow brought BTDT into the discussion.

[Unregistered]

Hey everyone! remember the stupid nutter whining like a baby about the DOJ "pressuring" poor state of NC.



Facts don't lie only cons do. This doesn't sound very democratic. I remember when cons howled at the moon if they perceived something wasn't democratic.

Ill tell you the one thing the cons will never do. Put it on a referendum. They well know that they hold minority views.

What source did you use? MoveOn? Progressive Daily? Daily Kos?

[Unregistered]

Wait, let's get this straight, you are looking for compassion for Lobbyists ?

If you happen to be in front of a TV screen yesterday afternoon, CNN had the Gov. of North Carolina on to discuss the issue. Despite Jake's best efforts to derail the Gov. from stating facts, he summarized it quite well. The entire problem was orchestrated by the Left, with their push to have all restrooms in the United States that are on the premises of employers with over 15 people make changes to fit the needs of the LLBGT community.

The Law passed in the NC Legislature applies only to State buildings, schools and Universities. And the Gov. said exactly what I stated here yesterday, that considerations for children with medical issues could be addressed through compromise. But compromise is not something that Obama the bully has in his portfolio.

Once again the Left has orchestrated chaos due to their meddling and as the supposed champions of the suppressed , and now their bully Obama trots out the Civil Rights Law that in its language, does not have LGBT in the wording. This is a Legislative issue to be addressed by Congress.

BEST POST OF THE WEEK!

I myself think the bathroom issue a tempest in a teapot. Transgenders have been using the bathrooms of their choice right along. Can anyone list one transgender who has been forced out of a bathroom anywhere in the US?

The expanded issue is a problem for me. Should transgenders be allowed to participant on the sports teams of their choice? This is going to exclude a lot of women from sports if biological males are allowed to participate on girls/women's sports teams. That's just one of many issues to consider.

[Unregistered]

2016: Women may serve combat military roles and we elect our first Ms. President!

Is that suppose to be a good thing?

Even if the Ms is corrupt?

[Unregistered]

Clear abuse of power

I bet you wouldn't care if the lobbyist represented oil or the big pharmaceuticals.

[Unregistered]

False equivalence. 1953. 18 year olds from Alabama burn a cross on a black mans lawn. 2016 college students build a clinic during a service learning mission to a third world country. You see, mr nutty nut bag, anything can be spun in any direction. You nutters think your 1940s world was like an idealized Norman Rockwell painting. You have this maudlin and nostalgic sentimental notion of the good ol days. It is nothing more than a nutter wet dream.

Ah but the first post is far more representative of the difference between 18 year olds of the 50s and the little snowflakes of the present.

[Unregistered]

Ah but the first post is far more representative of the difference between 18 year olds of the 50s and the little snowflakes of the present.

The 18 year old young ladies of today have the access to and opportunity to succeed in many roles from which they were largely excluded in 1944. Would you really rather raise a soccer playing daughter in 1944 over 2016?

[Unregistered]

Ah but the first post is far more representative of the difference between 18 year olds of the 50s and the little snowflakes of the present.

Generalize much? You are focusing on the outliers. The current generation of young millennials may be the most generous demographic in history. All you cons can focus on is war. These millennials focus on service, compassion, inclusion and charity. Try spending some time with college students rather than swallowing the propaganda and pabulum force fed to you by the MSM. The amount of television that nutters watch is mind boggling. They are too dulled by conventional thought to understand that the entire goal of television and other forms of media is to subliminally convince you to buy worthless crap that you most likely don't need. Everything that is posted in here by the nutters is a thought someone else spoon fed them to shape their thoughts. What sheep... baaaaaahhhhhhhhhh......

[Unregistered]

The 18 year old young ladies of today have the access to and opportunity to succeed in many roles from which they were largely excluded in 1944. Would you really rather raise a soccer playing daughter in 1944 over 2016?

There are also many roles that they have been released from. In addition, the lives of many teenage girls are profoundly affected in a negative fashion by social media.

[Unregistered]

There are also many roles that they have been released from. In addition, the lives of many teenage girls are profoundly affected in a negative fashion by social media.

????. Is that a yes? Take our daughters back to 1944?

[Unregistered]

The 18 year old young ladies of today have the access to and opportunity to succeed in many roles from which they were largely excluded in 1944. Would you really rather raise a soccer playing daughter in 1944 over 2016?

The feminization of America may have a lot to do with 18 year olds needing safe places in 2016. Don't take that as a criticism from an old white male because I am a mother who has seen what has happened to boys in the US over the past several decades. The pendulum needed to swing toward expanding girls'/women's opportunities, but not at the expense of our sons. Did you know more male millenials are likely to live at home with their parents than are female millenials?

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...han-females-2/