Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

No comment on Uygur's quote?

I didn't see any Uyghur anything in the post that I responded to.

You however had no comment on my post which was actually responsive to the one it answered. It brought forward copious amounts of data that flew in the face of "Muscat's" anecdotal data supporting Trump.

I note without editorial comment that Muscat is an old school political operative practiced in the exploitation of "bubba" politics. Thats the last thing this election will turn on.

tee hee
bwa ha ha

[Unregistered]

So a dispute over the right of a private college to resist an Executive order , is on the same page as a riot in the streets with property damage and the potential injuries ?

In the mind of a liberal, yes. And this guy deserved what he got. So says the tolerant left.

http://a5.img.talkingpointsmemo.com/...kap0iyyv0j.jpg

[Unregistered]

Tierney Sneed what a maroon. Will all those people turnout to vote for the most despicable person ever to run for president? The woman is a criminal.

Tierney Sneed? the person who WROTE the story...

what about all that gallup polling data in there ex lax....do i really have to bring i forward here on the page? cant you read down that far in the article.

tee hee
bwa ha ha

you sir are the maroon

[Unregistered]

So she was the candidate that ran a fake University that took people for tens of thousands of dollars in a major consumer scam?

She may be a weasel but nothing she did was illegal. Still waiting for those "indictments" for handling of emails. Do you have any notion of how low the threshold is for classifying a document in the federal government. During the Iraq war flyers encouraging soldiers to surrender were dropped on the enemy. The content of those documents was considered "Top Secret". You cannot make this shizzle up.

thanks. read some pieces long ago that talked to legal experts. They laughed at notion of an indictment for whats on the table at this point.

its there same thing as cons unskewing polls...they cannot accept reality so there think an immaculate reception is coming for them to bail them out.

Tilting at windmills.

[Unregistered]

thanks. read some pieces long ago that talked to legal experts. They laughed at notion of an indictment for whats on the table at this point.

its there same thing as cons unskewing polls...they cannot accept reality so there think an immaculate reception is coming for them to bail them out.

Tilting at windmills.

The only reality is that at this particular point, the only " legal experts " that are relevant are those in the FBI that are investigating. We need to simply wait and see what they decide to do.

[Unregistered]

So a dispute over the right of a private college to resist an Executive order , is on the same page as a riot in the streets with property damage and the potential injuries ?

No Executive order, no dispute. The economy is in tatters, and the Social Justice President is more concerned about less than 5 % of the population, if that.

Does Title iX apple to PRIVATE colleges ex lax?

then why would you think they are free to opt out of laws and executive order?

dumb, dumb, dumber, more dumb, and dumbest

[Unregistered]

The only reality is that at this particular point, the only " legal experts " that are relevant are those in the FBI that are investigating. We need to simply wait and see what they decide to do.

Sure...awesome...i agree....so tell your buddies to stop assedrtying an indictment is coming until they do

tee hee
bwa haha

in return, i will only frame the trump university lawsuit but not take a position on his guilt or innocence.

Fair?

tee hee

bwa haha

[Unregistered]

I didn't see any Uyghur anything in the post that I responded to.

You however had no comment on my post which was actually responsive to the one it answered. It brought forward copious amounts of data that flew in the face of "Muscat's" anecdotal data supporting Trump.

I note without editorial comment that Muscat is an old school political operative practiced in the exploitation of "bubba" politics. Thats the last thing this election will turn on.

tee hee
bwa ha ha

I wasn't responding to any of you posts today. I simply asked a question, "No response to Uygur's quote?" But in your usual way 1.) You confuse who you are speaking to and 2.) To deflect from the question, you go off on a rant that makes no sense. Just answer the question and the follow up, "Do you think Hillary will actually change course?" seeing how she's backed by Wall Street. Wall Street who we are told are Republican partisans when in fact the heads of most Wall Street companies are Democrats educated at many of the most liberal educational institutions this country has to offer. You see, the real dumb hicks are the ones educated at our local run of the mill colleges who are just attempting to make a living on Main Street.

[Unregistered]

Yes, in your little bubble of the world. The rest of the country? Not so much.

"The homeownership rate fell slightly in the first quarter of 2016, dashing hopes that it had finally hit a bottom.

In the first three months of this year, the rate was at 63.5%, not seasonally adjusted. That is down from 63.8% in the fourth quarter of 2015, according to estimates published on Thursday by the Commerce Department. That puts it back near its 48-year low of 63.4% in the second quarter of 2015.

Another potentially worrying sign for the housing market: This was the second consecutive quarter when the number of new households formed was anemic, with the data showing just over 540,000 new households formed in total in the first quarter. In the third quarter of 2015, the number of renter households alone increased by 1.3 million.

Economists said recent signs of a U.S. economic*slowdown*could be dampening demand for people to strike out and form new households.

“It could also indicate that the expansionary period of economic growth is starting to flatten a bit,” Mr. McLaughlin said.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/...a-48-year-low/

Two factors you are not considering: 1) homeowner lending standards have loosened but not to pre 2008 levels, 2) millenials do not put the same value on home ownership as Genx and the boomers did. But all I know in my neck of the woods houses are only the market for a few weeks - sometimes only a day or two. But agree that the SW still has an oversupply of housing.

[Unregistered]

In the mind of a liberal, yes. And this guy deserved what he got. So says the tolerant left.

http://a5.img.talkingpointsmemo.com/...kap0iyyv0j.jpg

Yeah, I am sure he shares none of the blame for a bloody nose..... 100% not at fault.

God - does that picture warm the cockles of my heart..... finally got a dose of their racism shoved right back into their faces.... literally....

[Unregistered]

Yeah, I am sure he shares none of the blame for a bloody nose..... 100% not at fault.

God - does that picture warm the cockles of my heart..... finally got a dose of their racism shoved right back into their faces.... literally....

Animals. So little respect for others.

[Unregistered]

More than half of the US working population makes less than $30,000 a year. Why are corporations so stupid that they can't understand that if people do not have disposable income that they cannot buy stuff? Surely businesses can't be that stupid. Oh but it is Obama's fault and the corporation who pay on a wage scale equivalent to 40 years are blameless. Do we blame the education system for producing graduates that are so stupid that they can't wrap their arms around fundamental economic realities? Or do we blame the morons in Dixieland who on average have a 10th grade education in states where only about 50% of the population even manages to get to the 11th grade?

Go read some of Henry Ford's theories about the economy and why he paid people above market wages. Then look at a picture of a Ford parking lot in 1912 with thousands of Model A's......

Only a lib would compare the economy of 2016 to 1912. How much were Ford's workers paying in income taxes in 1912? Oh right. There was no income tax in 1912.

So now let's move to more recent developments. My favorite topic, Obamacare. I just read recently that 47% of Americans can't afford an unexpected bill of $400. So you want to explain to me how Obamacare has helped these people out when those who aren't being subsidized by government are facing ever increasing healthcare costs? The biggest hit these people are taking is in the form of deductibles. Democrats like to brag about all the uninsured that now have insurance. That of course doesn't mean you can afford to actually go to the doctor. This even includes middle class working America whose employees are covering at least a portion of their insurance costs. Friend of mine's wife had to have a breast biopsy. Fortunately no cancer was found, but the cost of that biopsy was $1500 and all under the family deductible. How does the 47% pay for that?

[Unregistered]

How does the 47% pay for that?

By protesting Wall Street?

[Unregistered]

Only a lib would compare the economy of 2016 to 1912. How much were Ford's workers paying in income taxes in 1912? Oh right. There was no income tax in 1912.

So now let's move to more recent developments. My favorite topic, Obamacare. I just read recently that 47% of Americans can't afford an unexpected bill of $400. So you want to explain to me how Obamacare has helped these people out when those who aren't being subsidized by government are facing ever increasing healthcare costs? The biggest hit these people are taking is in the form of deductibles. Democrats like to brag about all the uninsured that now have insurance. That of course doesn't mean you can afford to actually go to the doctor. This even includes middle class working America whose employees are covering at least a portion of their insurance costs. Friend of mine's wife had to have a breast biopsy. Fortunately no cancer was found, but the cost of that biopsy was $1500 and all under the family deductible. How does the 47% pay for that?

The progressives almost never acknowledge the unintended consequences of their policies . Obama Care has hit the middle class the hardest. The upper class may be able to afford the increases, and by putting 7 million of the lower class on Medicaid, the class holding on for dear life is the middle class.

And Ford? They're expanding in Mexico, leaving Michigan and the Unions behind. Wonder what Henry would have to say about that.

[Unregistered]

I wasn't responding to any of you posts today. I simply asked a question, "No response to Uygur's quote?" But in your usual way 1.) You confuse who you are speaking to and 2.) To deflect from the question, you go off on a rant that makes no sense. Just answer the question and the follow up, "Do you think Hillary will actually change course?" seeing how she's backed by Wall Street. Wall Street who we are told are Republican partisans when in fact the heads of most Wall Street companies are Democrats educated at many of the most liberal educational institutions this country has to offer. You see, the real dumb hicks are the ones educated at our local run of the mill colleges who are just attempting to make a living on Main Street.

I replied to a post that didn't mention ugyher or whomever . I really have no idea who that is.
So I was on point.

Some con, perhaps OP, ignores th comment on point to the original post and demands a response to something said in a separate post.

nOw perhaps you have ADD I don't know but most competent adults keep their thought streams more disciplined than that. You don't and that explains the word salad nature of your posts.

Nice day ex lax get out from under your troll bridge and get some sun, will do you good and keep the vitamin d levels up