Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

So Kochs and Adelson can all those fat cats can give hundreds of millions. Soros can give millions but unlike the Kochs and Adelson and the rest of the Republican sugar daddies he gets criticized. God forbid though that WORKERS should band together to have in aggregate the kind of info;hence the MASTERS of the UNIVERSe have.

ex lax here has always been behind people like the Kochs.

ex lax....why don't you crawl out from under you bed and crawl right under the desk of some Republican sugar daddies. I am sure a likely closeted guy like you can potentially find some congress with a group that historically has a high quotient off pervs and/or closeted folks.

It really burns you when the little people like union workers attempt to use the same legal means to participate in our democracy as the fat cats do.

If you don't like it ask your masters to change some laws....of course then your side cant duo it.

Punk off.

I think I ll send some money tp Planned Parenthood today ex lax. in your honor.

Do you really want me to go back to Open Secrets AGAIN?

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

Smahtest guy in the forum, my a $$!

[Unregistered]

and I would not be surprised if you are a tin foil hat wearing chicken little who sees conspiracy at every turn. someone so paranoid you are afraid of your own shadow.

going to get outside today? will do you good. Unless you are afraid. maybe we can send a few strong liberals to hold your hand

Bwahahahaha! Federal court rules against the IRS and the Little p wants the forum to believe it's a "great right wing conspiracy". What an a $$ hat this guy is. Smahtest guy in the forum! Bwahahahaha!

[Unregistered]

When Thomas Sowell gets dragged forward (he is one of ex lax's GO TO guys, being a long term recipient of wing nut welfare at the Hoover Institute) this liberal smells desperation in the air.

There are few people in the world as irrelevant to our dialogs as Thomas Sowell.

tee hee
bwaw haha

Racist!!!

[Unregistered]

"[Americans] estimate that a staggering 38 percent of Republican Party supporters earn more than $250,000 a year. This is impossible, because only 1.5 percent of Americans live in households that have incomes that high. It's even more off base when you consider that rich people are actually much more likely to be Democrats than Republicans. ...

Conversely, Americans also say they believe that nearly a third of the Democratic Party's supporters are gay or lesbian, and that somethings like 40 percent are African-American. ... Fewer than 4 percent of Americans identify as gay, lesbian, or transgender, and only about 20 percent of Democrats are African-American."

Voters aren't just ignorant about government -- they're also ignorant about other voters. And of course, their ignorance isn't random: it's biased towards whatever absurd, irrational prejudices they enjoy about the "other side."

Source?

[Unregistered]

here is some Thomas Sowell:



ex lax thinks this guy has something to say.

if Sowell believes what he said above i think he needs some Thorazine.

ex lax here is where you don your tin foil hat, rush in, and convince us our grandchildren will be living under Sharia law.

Gonna take a swing at that one or are you going to IGNORE that question like you do every question I ask that immediately hoists you on petard.

For example, Ive asked a dozen times if Ive asked once...whats going on with your enthusiastic support for and identification with Trump?

tee hee
bwa hahahaha

have a nice day.

Bwahahahaha!

Your source? Think Progress! Bwahahahaha! What an a $$ hat!

[Unregistered]

brilliant

My favorite lesbian feminist!

"While I am firmly pro-choice and support unrestricted access to abortion, I have been disturbed and repelled for decades by the way reproductive rights have become an ideological tool ruthlessly exploited by my own party, the Democrats, to inflame passions, raise money, and drive voting.This mercenary process began with the Senate confirmation hearings for three Supreme Court candidates nominated by Republican presidents: Robert Bork in 1987, David Souter in 1990, and Clarence Thomas in 1991. (Bork was rejected, while Souter and Thomas were approved.) Those hearings became freak shows of feminist fanaticism, culminating in the elevation to martyr status of Anita Hill, whose charges of sexual harassment against Thomas still seem to me flimsy and overblown (and effectively neutralized by Hill’s following Thomas to another job). Abortion was the not-so-hidden motivation of the Democratic operatives who pushed a reluctant Hill forward and fanned the flames in the then monochromatially liberal mainstream media"

"Despite my pro-abortion stance (I call the term pro-choice “a cowardly euphemism”), I profoundly respect the pro-life viewpoint, which I think has the moral high ground. I wrote in “No Law in the Arena”: “We career women are arguing from expedience: it is personally and professionally inconvenient or onerous to bear an unwanted child. The pro-life movement, in contrast, is arguing that every conception is sacred and that society has a responsibility to protect the defenseless.” The silence from second-wave feminists about the ethical ambiguities in their pro-choice belief system has been deafening."

"Many women like myself (a gay liberal) are deeply upset over the abortion issue. Ultrasound technology has allowed us t(o see into the womb like never before, and the obvious face of humanity is clear..... Gloria Steinem) is someone who tried to normalize abortion, and I despise her for it. The Democrats have become callous and extreme on the issue,.....*There is a moral hollowness at the core of Western careerist feminism, a bourgeois secular code that sees children as an obstruction to self-realization or as a management problem to be farmed out to working-class nannies.Liberals routinely delude themselves with shrill propaganda about the motivation of “anti-woman” pro-life supporters. Hillary deals in those smears as her stock in trade."

"There are abundant contradictions in a liberal feminism that supports abortion yet opposes capital punishment. The violence intrinsic to abortion cannot be wished away by magical thinking..... Progressives need to do some soul-searching about their reflex rhetoric in demeaning the pro-life cause. A liberal credo that is variously anti-war, anti-fur, vegan, and committed to environmental protection of endangered species like the sage grouse or spotted owl should not be so stridently withholding its imagination and compassion from the unborn."

http://www.salon.com/2016/04/07/cami...tional_debate/

Sex is nature’s way—coercive, prankish, and pleasurable–of ensuring survival of the species. But in eras of overpopulation, those pleasures spill into a multitude of directions to slow or halt procreation—which is why I maintain that homosexuality is not a violation of natural law but its fulfillment, when history wills it.

[Unregistered]

here is some Thomas Sowell:



ex lax thinks this guy has something to say.

if Sowell believes what he said above i think he needs some Thorazine.

ex lax here is where you don your tin foil hat, rush in, mand convince us our grandchildren will be living under Sharia law.

Gonna take a swing at that one or are you going to IGNORE thatquestion like you do every question I ask that immediately hoists you on petard.

For example, Ive asked a dozen times if Ive asked once...whats going on with your enthusiastic support for and identification with Trump?

tee hee
bwa hahahaha

have a nice day.

"The stakes in all this are far higher than which element becomes dominant in which party or which party wins more elections. Both the domestic- and foreign-policy direction of the current administration in Washington are leading this country into dangerous waters, from which we may or may not be able to return.

A quadrupling of the national debt in just one year and accepting a nuclear-armed sponsor of international terrorism such as Iran are not things from which any country is guaranteed to recover.Just two nuclear bombs were enough to get Japan to surrender in World War II. It is hard to believe that it would take much more than that for the United States of America to surrender especially with people in control of both the White House and the Congress who were for turning tail and running in Iraq just a couple of years ago.

Perhaps people who are busy gushing over the Obama cult today might do well to stop and think about what it would mean for their granddaughters to live under sharia law.The glib pieties in Barack Obama's televised sermonettes will not stop Iran from becoming a nuclear terrorist nation. Time is running out fast". - Thomas Sowell, June 2009.

hy·per·bo·le

hīˈpərbəlē/
noun

exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.

[Unregistered]

here is some Thomas Sowell:



ex lax thinks this guy has something to say.

if Sowell believes what he said above i think he needs some Thorazine.

ex lax here is where you don your tin foil hat, rush in, and convince us our grandchildren will be living under Sharia law.

Gonna take a swing at that one or are you going to IGNORE that question like you do every question I ask that immediately hoists you on petard.

For example, Ive asked a dozen times if Ive asked once...whats going on with your enthusiastic support for and identification with Trump?

tee hee
bwa hahahaha

have a nice day.

https://rednationrising.files.wordpr...630-181750.jpg

[Unregistered]

here is some Thomas Sowell:



ex lax thinks this guy has something to say.

if Sowell believes what he said above i think he needs some Thorazine.

ex lax here is where you don your tin foil hat, rush in, and convince us our grandchildren will be living under Sharia law.

Gonna take a swing at that one or are you going to IGNORE that question like you do every question I ask that immediately hoists you on petard.

For example, Ive asked a dozen times if Ive asked once...whats going on with your enthusiastic support for and identification with Trump?

tee hee
bwa hahahaha

have a nice day.

http://images.firstcovers.com/covers...-1775325.jpg?i

[Unregistered]

here is some Thomas Sowell:



ex lax thinks this guy has something to say.

if Sowell believes what he said above i think he needs some Thorazine.

ex lax here is where you don your tin foil hat, rush in, and convince us our grandchildren will be living under Sharia law.

Gonna take a swing at that one or are you going to IGNORE that question like you do every question I ask that immediately hoists you on petard.

For example, Ive asked a dozen times if Ive asked once...whats going on with your enthusiastic support for and identification with Trump?

tee hee
bwa hahahaha

have a nice day.

http://orig01.deviantart.net/f02e/f/...io-d7x2b9w.jpg

[Unregistered]

Sex is nature’s way—coercive, prankish, and pleasurable–of ensuring survival of the species. But in eras of overpopulation, those pleasures spill into a multitude of directions to slow or halt procreation—which is why I maintain that homosexuality is not a violation of natural law but its fulfillment, when history wills it.

You forgot the most important sentence....

"I argue that our real oppressor is not men or society but nature—the biological imperative that second-wave feminism and campus gender studies still refuse to acknowledge. Sex is nature’s way—coercive, prankish, and pleasurable–of ensuring survival of the species.....

[Unregistered]

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/...l?intcmp=hpbt4

The protestors accused the party of being a “bastion of racism, exclusion and oppression.” They chanted, “What is Derby? It’s the face of genocide” and “What is Derby? It’s the face of police brutality.”

I searched The New York Times archives and could find no evidence of police brutality at the Derby – nor could I find any evidence of ethnic cleansings.


Assume it's because of the lawn jockeys some have in their yards?

[Unregistered]

Since my grandpappy emigrated from Poland, I've heard my fair share of Polish jokes.

It's upsetting.

Polish Lives Matter!

[Unregistered]

Democrats don't care about poor people. They only care about getting reelected.

15 Minimum Wage: the Best Government Unions can Buy


"Before switching side and now saying he will sign the $15 minimum wage, Governor Jerry Brown in January*expressed concerns that the state’s new nation-leading $10-per-hour minimum wage “is enough for now,” because it will already cost the state budget an extra 250 million a year. Brown pointed to a California Department of Finance economic analysis warning that a $15 an hour minimum wage would devastate the state budget by adding an additional $4 billion-per-year in costs by 2021.Brown’s biggest concern is that the $15 minimum wage will actually hurt the poor people it is supposedly intended to help. “Raise the minimum wage too much and you put a lot of poor people out of work,” Brown told reporters, according to the*Sacramento Business Journal. “There*won’t be a lot of jobs. It’s a matter of balance.”

Big service businesses, like chain restaurants, hotels and retailers, can probably automate away many jobs that will be subject to a $15 minimum wage. But the wage spike is an*existential threat*to tens of thousands of small businesses that do not have the profits or expertise to automate away higher labor costs.

http://www.breitbart.com/california/...nions-can-buy/

$15 is the wrong goal for minimum-wage advocates

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...8bb_story.html

When it comes to public policy, popular and wise are not necessarily the same. Stuck on $7.25 per hour since 2009, the*federal minimum*is due for an increase, especially in light of stagnant wages and income inequality. The magnitude of that increase, however, is a matter for caution, given the widely varying labor-market conditions across the country and the likelihood that sharp mandatory wage hikes would reduce the supply of jobs. Also, the minimum wage is not an especially well-targeted way to help the working poor, because — unlike the earned-income tax credit wage subsidy — it benefits many workers who are not poor, not supporting families, or both.

15 per hour would represent a quantum leap in the U.S. minimum wage, from its present level of about 35 percent of the median full-time hourly wage to nearly 75 percent of it, based on our reading of figures from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. No other industrialized country’s statutory minimum wage even comes close.

Even phased in over a few years, $15 would represent a major departure, about which existing economic research offers little solid guidance. This might be why Alan B. Krueger, the minimum-wage expert who formerly headed Mr. Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers,*has written: “A minimum wage set as high as $12 an hour will do more good than harm for low-wage workers, but a $15-an-hour national minimum wage would put us in uncharted waters, and risk undesirable and unintended consequences.” The obvious risks — borne disproportionately by the very-low-income workers whom minimums are meant to help — are apparent even to advocates of the $15 minimum.

[Unregistered]

The deflections continue.

18 men were arrested in Florida last week for answering ads on the internet to have sex with minors. It was a sting set up by the Police.

If these men were residents of the State of Washington, any one of them could walk into a ladies room in a Public Building, or a locker room at the Y and say they identify themselves as a female. Of course they would be within their rights, and according to Liberals , we shouldn't worry about them unless they commit a crime.

This is 21st Century living brought to you by Liberals.

only someone as depraved as you would immediately cook up such a scenario.