Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

But but he locked up the vote of the third of us who are racists......

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-t...ady-to-resign/

[Unregistered]

But but he locked up the vote of the third of us who are racists......

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-t...ady-to-resign/

Only 1/3? I thought we were all racist?

[Unregistered]

Dems, too.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...mo-leaked.html

The November 2015 memo included tips like: Do not offer “support for concrete policy positions;” be sure to "lead from behind;" stick to "small" meetings; and avoid mentioning terms like "black-on-black crime."

On its Facebook page, BLM said officials should "stop pacifying" them.

“We are disappointed at the DCCC’s placating response to our demand to value all Black life. Black communities deserve to be heard, not handled. People are dying,” the organization said, in response to the leaked document.

//////

I'll say it again: Even though I disagree with much of what Trump says, at least he speaks from what he believes in. Nobody really knows what the Dems believe in...since they don't say anything that hasn't be coached, approved, vetted, drafted, redrafted, and then sent out and not said live.

[Unregistered]

Dems, too.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...mo-leaked.html

The November 2015 memo included tips like: Do not offer “support for concrete policy positions;” be sure to "lead from behind;" stick to "small" meetings; and avoid mentioning terms like "black-on-black crime."

On its Facebook page, BLM said officials should "stop pacifying" them.

“We are disappointed at the DCCC’s placating response to our demand to value all Black life. Black communities deserve to be heard, not handled. People are dying,” the organization said, in response to the leaked document.

//////

I'll say it again: Even though I disagree with much of what Trump says, at least he speaks from what he believes in. Nobody really knows what the Dems believe in...since they don't say anything that hasn't be coached, approved, vetted, drafted, redrafted, and then sent out and not said live.

"Passports for sale...get your passports here!" -Clinton Foundation workin' they system again.

[Unregistered]

I'll speak to the rest of the crowd. These republican "men" Only Go crazy about the dicks of the people they don't like and what they are up to.

Does he discuss trump dipping his dick in illegal immigrant honey himself? Or his parties with Jeffrey Epstein at mar a lago?

Hell no. No criticism there. Probably aspires to do some of the same. It's fine if you are a con. Also fine to grab your viagra and head out on a Dominican sex tour like rusty Limbaugh. Or roger ailes. It's fine when cons are harassers.

One erect democratic penis and that's all they can talk about? Must be their inferiority complex at work ....the middle aged uneducated white male followers of Limbaugh ailes trump and Epstein have no morals here .....

Your likely just another cirrhotic perverted pig like ailes himself. Or Limbaugh. Eating narcotics like candy maybe?

Umm. These were unforced errors by Mr. Wiener. You can spout all day about anyone you want. But Wiener can't stop sending pics of jr. wiener.

And on the Epstein front. Bill Clinton seems to have some history there....

What is it about Mr. Wiener and Mr. Clinton where they have to so publicly shame their spouses? Seems like a real mental illness going on there. It is not enough to just have a quiet affair but to make is so obscenely public and embarrassing. Odd.

[Unregistered]

Umm. These were unforced errors by Mr. Wiener. You can spout all day about anyone you want. But Wiener can't stop sending pics of jr. wiener.

And on the Epstein front. Bill Clinton seems to have some history there....

What is it about Mr. Wiener and Mr. Clinton where they have to so publicly shame their spouses? Seems like a real mental illness going on there. It is not enough to just have a quiet affair but to make is so obscenely public and embarrassing. Odd.

Do you suppose the two couples have ever had dinner together?
BC- "Anthony could you please put your weiner away while we eat"
AW- " Sure Bill - you first."
BC- "How about we go outside and smoke a cigar - Anthony turn your damn phone off"

[Unregistered]

Do you suppose the two couples have ever had dinner together?
BC- "Anthony could you please put your weiner away while we eat"
AW- " Sure Bill - you first."
BC- "How about we go outside and smoke a cigar - Anthony turn your damn phone off"

Meanwhile the Republican party is a smoldering pile of dogsh!t.
lol

[Unregistered]

Meanwhile the Republican party is a smoldering pile of dogsh!t.
lol

The agents at the FBI are livid that Comey (FBI Director James Comey) did what he did

They are claiming there was more than sufficient evidence to bring several indictments against Hillary Clinton. It wasn't a slam dunk case, but it had more than a good probability of a conviction for Hillary Clinton. ***** and Obama made it clear to Comey that if he pressed for an indictment, he would be taking the Democrat nominee for president out of the election. If he failed to get a conviction he would be facing charges of tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal election, to which he would be facing the rest of his life in prison, and Obama and *****, as well as others, would see to it that he did. Now you know why he presented his case the way he did and why it was so obvious he was reluctant to not press for an indictment.

Hillary's statement to the FBI was intentionally given without a court reporter present or without any recording of her testimony to prevent her from having any further exposure to legal charges like perjury. If she lied to Congress, they have no written FBI deposition to confront Hillary with. This was set up to let her walk without fear of being charged with giving False Testimony or being charged with Obstruction of Justice.

This is what those in the "legalese world" call a "Straw Man" legal charge. (It is a charge designed to make someone appear innocent of the charges!) EXAMPLE: Bill beats up Shirley at their home. Bill is arrested for "Felony Spousal Abuse". Bill's lawyer gets the charges dismissed because Bill is not married to Shirley! (They are only "live in boyfriend and girlfriend".) Bill walks out of court totally exonerated of the charges thanks to a technicality! The twist in the case is the arresting officer knew all along Bill was not married to Shirley because the officer and Bill are old fraternity brothers. The officer intentionally charged Bill with something he knew would not stick. Bill would easily have been convicted of Assault and Battery, but he was not charged with that! This is what is known as the "STRAW MAN" charge. It is how you make a guilty person appear innocent.

This is exactly what was done with the Hillary Clinton case! If she had been charged with "Destruction of Government Documents", she would have easily been convicted, because she admitted to doing this! Instead, she was charged with "Mishandling Classified Documents" which has wiggle room for reasonable doubt regarding Criminal Intent! I think citizens are finally fed up with the Clintons and the cesspool of corruption that is our current government. Real Americans are ready to take our country back.

All of these years of corruption have taken a toll on American lives. Citizens opinions of a lying White House, a corrupt Congress, the "pay to play" politicians, the legalese lawyers and lobbyists, big overspending "welfare mentality" government, the "looking for a loop hole" justice system, the lying media, and our censored educational system with an agenda to dumb down the next generation, is at the lowest point ever. Hillary is on the wrong side of every issue.

The British Exit from the EU (Brexit) is just a small sign that real citizens of civilized nations are ready to take their country back. They are sick of the results of open borders and globalization led by power hungry elites. Hillary Clinton has no character or integrity. She is an arrogant, condescending political elite who is only interested in lining the Clinton pockets with donations to the Clinton Foundation (wink, wink) from PACS, lobbyists, and foreign nations that buy access and favors. The Clinton Foundation is nothing more than an operation used to launder money for the Clintons and other politicians involved in illegal activities

The Clintons are able to use the information of those participating to obtain cover for their activities, or blackmail those who are laundering money through them. Just count the number of politicians who arrive in Washington with nothing, but leave as millionaires and billionaires. Did their votes serve in the best interest of their constituents or did they only benefit themselves? If the representatives of your state fall in this category, then I suggest an investigation be launched.

FYI....It has come to light that Comey was (or still is) on the Board of Directors of the HSBC Bank where the Clinton Foundation has holdings.

ED KLEIN who wrote the book on the Clintons - coming out next week -- said Hillary was called to the office of Valerie Jarrett and Obama back in 2009 and told her she had to stop sending emails thru her personal server ---OBVIOUSLY SHE DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM. So, YES, Obama knew and Jarrett Knew and Huma knew along with how many others!!!! READ ON.....very interesting......

"FBI Director James Comey basically delivered a coded message to the American People and the world. He said...she is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, certainly should not be president and should be brought to justice ..however our country has been infiltrated and is basically corrupt!

***** and Obama made it clear to him...if he pressed for an indictment, he would be taking the Democrat nominee for president out of the election...If....he then failed to get a conviction...he would be facing charges of tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal election to which he would be facing the rest of his life in prison...

Now you know why he presented his case the way he did and why it was so obvious he was reluctant to not press for indictment.

Also....The key is in what Comey said...80 email chains.....that means an exchange between people...Hillary sending AND RECEIVING.....so if he charges Hillary he has to charge the others in the chain...what if the exchange is with Obama...it is not a stretch to think the Sec of State would be in email contact with POTUS (PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES)....

Let's just say...Bill went to Loretta and said shut this down...or else; if Hillary is charged she will tell under oath that some of the emails were with the President...so he is also guilty of a felony...THAT is IMPEACHABLE...the Republicans would go for it...the Dem would yell racism and the country erupts in violence...***** tells Comey...you better watch it or you could be to blame for violence tearing this country part...what is he to do???...So Comey takes 20 minutes spelling out everything bad Hillary did....just like a trial in public.....then stops short to prevent any unrest...

The law firm Kahn worked for is also the law firm for the royal court of Saudi Arabia and the tax lawyers for the Clintons and for the Clinton Foundation and is also the firm Loretta ***** work for. They also represent a small Tech firm in Denver Colorado which so happens to be the same Tech firm that managed Hillary's private server. Coincidence?

[Unregistered]

I had a similar theory behind Comey's odd behavior. He was between a rock and hard place. The way he chose his words was peculiar to say the least. He was asking for further investigation to take place without asking directly. He knows she is guilty and he knows that eventually she will be indighted and a firestorm will erupt. He just maneuvered his way out from being the match that starts the blaze. We're talking about how history will be recorded. Nobody wants to have their life and legacy defined by this.

[Unregistered]

The agents at the FBI are livid that Comey (FBI Director James Comey) did what he did

They are claiming there was more than sufficient evidence to bring several indictments against Hillary Clinton. It wasn't a slam dunk case, but it had more than a good probability of a conviction for Hillary Clinton. ***** and Obama made it clear to Comey that if he pressed for an indictment, he would be taking the Democrat nominee for president out of the election. If he failed to get a conviction he would be facing charges of tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal election, to which he would be facing the rest of his life in prison, and Obama and *****, as well as others, would see to it that he did. Now you know why he presented his case the way he did and why it was so obvious he was reluctant to not press for an indictment.

Hillary's statement to the FBI was intentionally given without a court reporter present or without any recording of her testimony to prevent her from having any further exposure to legal charges like perjury. If she lied to Congress, they have no written FBI deposition to confront Hillary with. This was set up to let her walk without fear of being charged with giving False Testimony or being charged with Obstruction of Justice.

This is what those in the "legalese world" call a "Straw Man" legal charge. (It is a charge designed to make someone appear innocent of the charges!) EXAMPLE: Bill beats up Shirley at their home. Bill is arrested for "Felony Spousal Abuse". Bill's lawyer gets the charges dismissed because Bill is not married to Shirley! (They are only "live in boyfriend and girlfriend".) Bill walks out of court totally exonerated of the charges thanks to a technicality! The twist in the case is the arresting officer knew all along Bill was not married to Shirley because the officer and Bill are old fraternity brothers. The officer intentionally charged Bill with something he knew would not stick. Bill would easily have been convicted of Assault and Battery, but he was not charged with that! This is what is known as the "STRAW MAN" charge. It is how you make a guilty person appear innocent.

This is exactly what was done with the Hillary Clinton case! If she had been charged with "Destruction of Government Documents", she would have easily been convicted, because she admitted to doing this! Instead, she was charged with "Mishandling Classified Documents" which has wiggle room for reasonable doubt regarding Criminal Intent! I think citizens are finally fed up with the Clintons and the cesspool of corruption that is our current government. Real Americans are ready to take our country back.

All of these years of corruption have taken a toll on American lives. Citizens opinions of a lying White House, a corrupt Congress, the "pay to play" politicians, the legalese lawyers and lobbyists, big overspending "welfare mentality" government, the "looking for a loop hole" justice system, the lying media, and our censored educational system with an agenda to dumb down the next generation, is at the lowest point ever. Hillary is on the wrong side of every issue.

The British Exit from the EU (Brexit) is just a small sign that real citizens of civilized nations are ready to take their country back. They are sick of the results of open borders and globalization led by power hungry elites. Hillary Clinton has no character or integrity. She is an arrogant, condescending political elite who is only interested in lining the Clinton pockets with donations to the Clinton Foundation (wink, wink) from PACS, lobbyists, and foreign nations that buy access and favors. The Clinton Foundation is nothing more than an operation used to launder money for the Clintons and other politicians involved in illegal activities

The Clintons are able to use the information of those participating to obtain cover for their activities, or blackmail those who are laundering money through them. Just count the number of politicians who arrive in Washington with nothing, but leave as millionaires and billionaires. Did their votes serve in the best interest of their constituents or did they only benefit themselves? If the representatives of your state fall in this category, then I suggest an investigation be launched.

FYI....It has come to light that Comey was (or still is) on the Board of Directors of the HSBC Bank where the Clinton Foundation has holdings.

ED KLEIN who wrote the book on the Clintons - coming out next week -- said Hillary was called to the office of Valerie Jarrett and Obama back in 2009 and told her she had to stop sending emails thru her personal server ---OBVIOUSLY SHE DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM. So, YES, Obama knew and Jarrett Knew and Huma knew along with how many others!!!! READ ON.....very interesting......

"FBI Director James Comey basically delivered a coded message to the American People and the world. He said...she is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, certainly should not be president and should be brought to justice ..however our country has been infiltrated and is basically corrupt!

***** and Obama made it clear to him...if he pressed for an indictment, he would be taking the Democrat nominee for president out of the election...If....he then failed to get a conviction...he would be facing charges of tampering with and changing the outcome of a federal election to which he would be facing the rest of his life in prison...

Now you know why he presented his case the way he did and why it was so obvious he was reluctant to not press for indictment.

Also....The key is in what Comey said...80 email chains.....that means an exchange between people...Hillary sending AND RECEIVING.....so if he charges Hillary he has to charge the others in the chain...what if the exchange is with Obama...it is not a stretch to think the Sec of State would be in email contact with POTUS (PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES)....

Let's just say...Bill went to Loretta and said shut this down...or else; if Hillary is charged she will tell under oath that some of the emails were with the President...so he is also guilty of a felony...THAT is IMPEACHABLE...the Republicans would go for it...the Dem would yell racism and the country erupts in violence...***** tells Comey...you better watch it or you could be to blame for violence tearing this country part...what is he to do???...So Comey takes 20 minutes spelling out everything bad Hillary did....just like a trial in public.....then stops short to prevent any unrest...

The law firm Kahn worked for is also the law firm for the royal court of Saudi Arabia and the tax lawyers for the Clintons and for the Clinton Foundation and is also the firm Loretta ***** work for. They also represent a small Tech firm in Denver Colorado which so happens to be the same Tech firm that managed Hillary's private server. Coincidence?

Very entertaining story. Got any more? lol

[Unregistered]

Profile pic of Republican party

https://frigginloon.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/poo.gif

[Unregistered]

The truth will come out eventually. I'm not a Trump supporter, just sick and tired of the Clinton/Obama monarchy.
I don't know which is worse? Learning the truth pre or post election? Either way HRC will be too embroiled in this fiasco of her own arrogant doing that her presidency will be a catastrophe.

[Unregistered]

https://frigginloon.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/poo.gif

Love the smell of libs resorting to posting more cartoons in the morning.
-Teehee!

[Unregistered]

Love the smell of libs resorting to posting more cartoons in the morning.
-Teehee!

This one is especially for you!

http://i67.tinypic.com/a4d2h.jpg

[Unregistered]

Very entertaining story. Got any more? lol

Based on Hillary's actions, she would not be able to be hired by the State Department if she applied there for a job. But she is entitled to run for the highest office in the land.