Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

I assume then that you have a problem with the billions (trillions?) of dollars given to DARPA and then funneled to defense contractors to spur innovation in military applications that also have commercial applications. Billions for weapons of war but not a penny for peaceful applications of technology right? DARPA is the ultimate venture capitalist funding source.

The blinders you nutters wear are astounding.

Cujo

What is truly astounding is the Progressive"s distaste for the US Military. Without their blood, guts and sacrifices, you perhaps would be doing your gigs from a gulag. As a matter of fact, next time you need GPS to find the stage you can thank the military.

[Unregistered]

Straight from the mouth of the leader of the Republucan party...

"He was asking me a theoretical, or just a question in theory, and I talked about it only from that standpoint. Of course not. And that was done, he said, you know, I guess it was theoretically, but he was asking me a rhetorical question, and I gave an answer. And by the way, people thought from an academic standpoint, and asked rhetorically, people said that answer was an unbelievable academic answer. But of course not, and I said that afterwards. Everybody understands that. "

He is in so far over his head. Look very carefully at his VP. If by some miracle he wins in November, look for him to get out and hand it all over.

[Unregistered]

seems eloquent compared to the Kenyan without a teleprompter.

[Unregistered]

seems eloquent compared to the Kenyan without a teleprompter.

Full Definition of eloquent

1: marked by forceful and fluent expression <an eloquent preacher>

2: vividly or movingly expressive or revealing <an eloquent monument>

It is revealing - I will give you that.

[Unregistered]

seems eloquent compared to the Kenyan without a teleprompter.

You took a wrong turn. Stormfront is thataway -->

[Unregistered]

seems eloquent compared to the Kenyan without a teleprompter.

He knows he will be asked about his response to the punish women for having an abortion question over and over again. That must have been his practiced response.

[Unregistered]

More eloquence from the Leader of the Republican party...

"Well, what I mean by that is it almost shouldn’t have been done. And you know, I really don’t even know what I mean, because that was a long time ago, and who knows what was in my head. I think that it wasn’t done correctly. In retrospect, it shouldn’t have been done at all. It was sort of, you know, it was just done. It was just, we dropped bombs. Now if you look back, actually, that was probably the correct way of doing it, not going in, and not upsetting, giving them a lesson or not. I mean, I think Senior actually did a pretty good job of what he was doing. He went in, he taught them a lesson. What happened is he was taunted. Because Saddam Hussein was saying, “We drove back the Americans. The ugly Americans were driven back, the power of Iraq, the power.”

[Unregistered]

More eloquence from the Leader of the Republican party...

"Well, what I mean by that is it almost shouldn’t have been done. And you know, I really don’t even know what I mean, because that was a long time ago, and who knows what was in my head. I think that it wasn’t done correctly. In retrospect, it shouldn’t have been done at all. It was sort of, you know, it was just done. It was just, we dropped bombs. Now if you look back, actually, that was probably the correct way of doing it, not going in, and not upsetting, giving them a lesson or not. I mean, I think Senior actually did a pretty good job of what he was doing. He went in, he taught them a lesson. What happened is he was taunted. Because Saddam Hussein was saying, “We drove back the Americans. The ugly Americans were driven back, the power of Iraq, the power.”

Eloquence issues aside, this incoherent statement does bring up the issue of taunting.

To a proudly vengeful person as himself, taunting is a serious offense. He seems helpless at times in the face of it.

[Unregistered]

http://images.yuku.com/image/jpg/570...25060147_r.jpg

[Unregistered]

Good gawd, we are going to have to go t1t for tat all day now?

Listen to Wasserman-Schultz on CNN the other day? Pure comedy. I suppose instead of stammering for an answer, she should just ignore the question and answer something else. It's like she's a poster on Talking-Soccer or something....

////

The issue came up because Clinton was asked by a retired coal miner during a town hall on Monday night how she can act like a friend to coal miners and West Virginians after saying in March that she was going to “put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business,” if she becomes president.

Clinton said that her earlier remarks were taken out of context and that it was a “misstatement.”

CNN host Alisyn Camerota asked Wasserman Schultz if she thought it was the right tact for Clinton to apologize for her earlier remarks.

Wasserman Schultz said that Clinton was right and that she wasn’t backtracking on the substance of what she was saying.

Camerota then asked if it was a problem when the retired miner said that they don’t know if Clinton can be trusted.

Rather than address the question she was asked, Wasserman Schultz chose instead to attack GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, saying that he will cause the implosion of the Republican Party and that the Democrats have enthusiastic voters who are energized about the party’s candidates. She conveniently left out the fact that she has been doing everything she can to stop Bernie Sanders and ensure that Clinton will be the nominee.

[Unregistered]

Good gawd, we are going to have to go t1t for tat all day now?

Listen to Wasserman-Schultz on CNN the other day? Pure comedy. I suppose instead of stammering for an answer, she should just ignore the question and answer something else. It's like she's a poster on Talking-Soccer or something....

////

The issue came up because Clinton was asked by a retired coal miner during a town hall on Monday night how she can act like a friend to coal miners and West Virginians after saying in March that she was going to “put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business,” if she becomes president.

Clinton said that her earlier remarks were taken out of context and that it was a “misstatement.”

CNN host Alisyn Camerota asked Wasserman Schultz if she thought it was the right tact for Clinton to apologize for her earlier remarks.

Wasserman Schultz said that Clinton was right and that she wasn’t backtracking on the substance of what she was saying.

Camerota then asked if it was a problem when the retired miner said that they don’t know if Clinton can be trusted.

Rather than address the question she was asked, Wasserman Schultz chose instead to attack GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, saying that he will cause the implosion of the Republican Party and that the Democrats have enthusiastic voters who are energized about the party’s candidates. She conveniently left out the fact that she has been doing everything she can to stop Bernie Sanders and ensure that Clinton will be the nominee.

Definition of tit for tat

: an equivalent given in return (as for an injury) : retaliation in kind

You post an incoherent quote about an important issue said by one the front running democratic candidates, in response to posts of incoherent quote about important issues said by the front running republican candidate.

[Unregistered]

Clinton on Benzaghi:

A few days before the hearing, it was disclosed that a top U.S. diplomat had said "everyone" at the consulate thought "from the beginning" that the attack was an act of terror.

And even before that, Johnson had reminded citizens at least twice of what Clinton told him about the attack during a Senate committee hearing in January 2013.

"Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they’d go kill some Americans," Clinton said. "What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?"

[Unregistered]

Hillary on Libya:

During MSNBC’s Democratic townhall in Illinois Monday night, former Secretary of State and Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton said that “we didn’t lose a single person” in Libya.

During Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, terrorists attacked a U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and killed four Americans, including Christopher Stevens, the U.S. Ambassador to Libya.

[Unregistered]

Hillary on "her" e-mail:

Hillary Clinton's private server is currently in the possession of the FBI. And while it has been reported that the server was "wiped," what actually happened remains unclear. But not because the term is so hard to understand from a technical standpoint. In fact, wiping is a straightforward process. It's very different from hitting the delete button. And if it happened, experts say, it'll hamper the FBI investigation.

We keep hearing from Clinton and her top brass: They don't know the difference between deleting an email and wiping a computer clean.

"What, like with a cloth or something?" Clinton said to reporters at a news conference last month. "I don't know how it works digitally at all."

[Unregistered]

What is truly astounding is the Progressive"s distaste for the US Military. Without their blood, guts and sacrifices, you perhaps would be doing your gigs from a gulag. As a matter of fact, next time you need GPS to find the stage you can thank the military.

Where did I slam the military? I merely pointed out that if we spend tax dollars in the private sector for military purposes then we can spend it on non military applications.

Don't lecture me about the military. Father and brother are both 20+ year vets and my nephew served 3 tours in Afghanistan.

You nutters selectively use information and parse data - it is disingenuous....... the world is far more complex than what your simple world view can conjure up...

Cujo