Nadler says Article 1 of impeachment will charge "abuse of power" by the president, and Article 2 will charge him with "concealing evidence" about how he abused his power. Wait. If you don't have the evidence, how can you charge Article 1? Seems the articles cancel each other out
Nancy Pelosi: "Was it 2-1/2 years ago that, uh, they initiated, uh, the Mueller, uh, investigation? It is, uh, not about speed. It’s about urgency. If we did not hold him accountable, he would continue to undermine our election. It is not with any speed. This has been going on for a very long time, but there is a sense of urgency. That is what is at stake in this election.
House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment, accusing President Donald Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. CBS's Major Garrett discusses why it is significant that they did not charge Trump with bribery or extortion. Garrett said they backed off charges they seemed excited about last week because "they clearly don't believe they have the evidence to make that case stick."
Democrats did not include "bribery" or "quid pro quo" in their articles of impeachment against President Trump because they realized that the charge could backfire and bring down their own front-runner.
Democrats did not include "bribery" or "quid pro quo" in their articles of impeachment against President Trump because they realized that the charge could backfire and bring down their own front-runner.
So? Any prosecutor goes with the charges that have the best chance for a conviction. Also all you cons keep ignoring the 2nd charge, obstruction of Congress. There's no subtext to that. Did he obey his people not to hand over documents or testify, ignoring Congressional subpoenas? Yes.
Democrats did not include "bribery" or "quid pro quo" in their articles of impeachment against President Trump because they realized that the charge could backfire and bring down their own front-runner.
Tou cons can't let go of the fact that Biden or his son did nothing illegal.
Tou cons can't let go of the fact that Biden or his son did nothing illegal.
Hold on there snowflake....Hunter may or may not be innocent (personally I think he is)....but this whole thing started because Joe Daddy needed to be investigated (hence the liberal whistle blower)....FACT.
So lets let the Joe Daddy investigation be completed so we know the TRUTH!!!!!
If Joe Daddy is innocent why does he not want to be investigated?
If you are innocent, why do you need to take the 5th?
Hold on there snowflake....Hunter may or may not be innocent (personally I think he is)....but this whole thing started because Joe Daddy needed to be investigated (hence the liberal whistle blower)....FACT.
So lets let the Joe Daddy investigation be completed so we know the TRUTH!!!!!
If Joe Daddy is innocent why does he not want to be investigated?
If you are innocent, why do you need to take the 5th?
You aren’t making any sense at all anymore.
In other news, a certain someone has tweeted or retweeted over FORTY times so far today.
You have to be reminded about 911 and the involvement of Osama bin Laden and the Mujahideen in Afghanistan???
Is this another example of libs trying to rewrite history?
Why yes it is.
Yeah but why couldn’t Bush win and withdraw? He had what seven years? By the time he handed his hot mess there and Iraq to the next president (what was his name? ) the GOP has created a quagmire in both places.
Can you tell us about those “aluminum tubes” in Iraq? GOP lied us into that war.
Comment