Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Probably around September or October, 2020.

Bwahahaha!

TRUMP SAYS HE WILL DECLASSIFY FBI’S RUSSIA PROBE DOCUMENTS, ‘AND MUCH MORE’
https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/26/t...i-russia-fisa/

[Unregistered]

I wonder how the professor who got paid $300 to $400K to teach one class and came up with this cockamamy idea would answer this question.

"Let me test your liberalism. If you have a bachelor degree you on average earn 65% more than someone who doesn't have one. If you have a master's degree, 100% more over the course of your lifetime. So nothing is free like a free lunch. Nope. Neither is college. Somebody will be paying for this free college and it will be taxpayers. So are we really saying that someone who didn't go to college should be subsidizing the people who went and got the benefit of going to college and made more money? Is that really a liberal thing?" - Bill Maher

[Unregistered]

SiriusXM progressive radio host Zerlina Maxwell, a typical Millenial.

"You have kids making a decision at 18 years old to take up 200K plus dollars in debt. And basically you can never own a house, ever if you have that much debt. You'll be renting forever and ever... I had a decision between going to a state school and going to Tufts University which is a better school and I chose the one I wanted to go to. But someone should have directed me to the school that was giving me a scholarship."

#1 18 year olds shouldn't be making that decision and probably aren't. It is the parents that have the final say. And as she states at the end "someone should have directed me." If your parents abdicated from making that decision to keep you out of debt then that's on both you, Zerlina and your parents. Not the taxpayers.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...ml?jwsource=cl

[Unregistered]

I wonder how the professor who got paid $300 to $400K to teach one class and came up with this cockamamy idea would answer this question.

"Let me test your liberalism. If you have a bachelor degree you on average earn 65% more than someone who doesn't have one. If you have a master's degree, 100% more over the course of your lifetime. So nothing is free like a free lunch. Nope. Neither is college. Somebody will be paying for this free college and it will be taxpayers. So are we really saying that someone who didn't go to college should be subsidizing the people who went and got the benefit of going to college and made more money? Is that really a liberal thing?" - Bill Maher

"That's an incredible transfer from lower income people to higher income people. If you look at the beneficiaries it's a huge subsidy to higher income people and if you are out buying votes, you go with the people you think are going to vote." - Grover Norquist

[Unregistered]

Joe Biden is running on the media's Charlottesville lie about Trump
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...ie-about-trump

[i]“He said there were, quote, ‘Some very fine people on both sides,’” said Biden. “Very fine people on both sides? With those words the president of the United States assigned a moral equivalence between those spreading hate and those with the courage to stand against it and in that moment I knew the threat to this nation was unlike any other I’d seen in my lifetime.”

His primary motivation to run for president was apparently not so much a belief he had the right ideas on healthcare or immigration or the judiciary, but a blatantly out-of-context quote from Trump that the media played out years ago.

After the violent clash in Charlottesville, where protests against the taking down of an historical statue of Confederate general Robert E. Lee morphed into an alt-right rally, Trump held a press conference wherein he was repeatedly asked about the incident.

Out of more than 15 minutes of questions and answers, the press glommed onto the three seconds where Trump said “You also had people that were very fine people on both sides.” It was made to look as though Trump had equated white supremacists who hijacked the event and liberals who were there to counterprotest.

This is precisely the opposite of what Trump said.

Trump made clear several times during the conference that he was referring specifically to those who had showed up to demonstrate against the statue’s removal and that he otherwise condemned the white supremacists.

What Trump said, as transcribed by the Los Angeles Times:

“I’ve condemned neo-Nazis. I've condemned many different groups. But not all of [the people at the rally] were neo-Nazis, believe me. Not all of those people were white supremacists, by any stretch. Those people were also there because they wanted to protest the taking down of a statue, Robert E. Lee.”
A reporter yelled out, “Both sides, sir?”

Referring to the so-called “antifa,” which was also present at the rally wearing masks, throwing paint and spraying urine, Trump said, “Well, I do think there's blame — yes, I think there's blame on both sides.”

But Trump also said, “You have some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides.”

He again specified that he was not referring to white supremacists, saying, “You had people, and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists” [emphasis added].

Later, he said, “If you look, they were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I'm sure in that group there were some bad ones.”

What inspired Biden to run is a tired, old media lie.[/b]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...ie-about-trump

This is an example of the media only using whatever they can to keep a certain narrative going . Propaganda plain and simple. Shape and form the " news" that they present, pushing one " bombshell " after another , to keep the Party ( DNC ) line going.

Ever notice the similarity of the words used by the MSM ? Those are the Talking Points released to them by the DNC .

[Unregistered]

Can you guess who said it?

"On April 12, I toured the busiest border crossing between America and Mexico — the San Ysidro Port of Entry, in San Diego — and the walls being built around it. Guided by a U.S. Border Patrol team, I also traveled along the border right down to where the newest 18-foot-high slatted steel barrier ends and the wide-open hills and craggy valleys beckoning drug smugglers, asylum-seekers and illegal immigrants begin.

It’s a very troubling scene... The whole day left me more certain than ever that we have a real immigration crisis and that the solution is a high wall with a big gate — but a smart gate."

Where are the libs? We know TMan says he's busy with a new building, but where are the rest of the libs who post? Or were they TMan's other personalities posting?

[Unregistered]

How 'bout that judge?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/u...-indicted.html

How 'bout those DAs?

https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/04...an-to-sue-ice/

[Unregistered]

Did hell freeze over?

"We just had a very productive meeting with the President of the United States. We came to this meeting with the understanding that there is a great need in our country for rebuilding our infrastructure," Pelosi said. "We're very excited about the conversation we had."

"We agreed on a number [$2 trillion], which was very, very good,” Schumer said. "This was a very very very good start."

[Unregistered]

Did hell freeze over?

"We just had a very productive meeting with the President of the United States. We came to this meeting with the understanding that there is a great need in our country for rebuilding our infrastructure," Pelosi said. "We're very excited about the conversation we had."

"We agreed on a number [$2 trillion], which was very, very good,” Schumer said. "This was a very very very good start."

Chuck and Nancy are smart. They know with the state of the economy, no collusion, and Trump's Poll numbers exactly where Obama's were at the same time in their terms it is time to get something done for the American people. They need some positive news to offset the radical freshmen generating negative buzz.

[Unregistered]

Did hell freeze over?

"We just had a very productive meeting with the President of the United States. We came to this meeting with the understanding that there is a great need in our country for rebuilding our infrastructure," Pelosi said. "We're very excited about the conversation we had."

"We agreed on a number [$2 trillion], which was very, very good,” Schumer said. "This was a very very very good start."

Now if only Nance and Upchuck would show a little goodwill on the subject of immigration and securing our borders.

[Unregistered]

Maybe now it finally dawn on the Cons what suckers and dolts they’ve been.

Nah... can’t fix stupid.

[Unregistered]

Did hell freeze over?

"We just had a very productive meeting with the President of the United States. We came to this meeting with the understanding that there is a great need in our country for rebuilding our infrastructure," Pelosi said. "We're very excited about the conversation we had."

"We agreed on a number [$2 trillion], which was very, very good,” Schumer said. "This was a very very very good start."

Shortly after Trump trashed the proposal. The three also had not come up with how the bill would be paid for.

Speaking of deficits and spending, a new in depth analysis concludes what most suspected - that American workers got almost nothing from the tax bill but corporations got plenty, in fact even more than they initially pressed for. Just 6% of corporate tax savings went to workers, who saw an average annual pay increase of $233. The rest went to dividends and buybacks which benefits the 10% of Americans that own 85% of US stocks. Non partisan groups that would normally analyze such a sweeping bill were cut out of the process. Certain Congressional members were kept in the dark. The bil also created many new loopholes that benefit companies and wealthy individuals and has been described by tax experts as "deeply flawed." All while adding over a trillion dollars to the US deficit.

https://publicintegrity.org/business...umps-tax-cuts/

[Unregistered]

Shortly after Trump trashed the proposal. The three also had not come up with how the bill would be paid for.

Speaking of deficits and spending, a new in depth analysis concludes what most suspected - that American workers got almost nothing from the tax bill but corporations got plenty, in fact even more than they initially pressed for. Just 6% of corporate tax savings went to workers, who saw an average annual pay increase of $233. The rest went to dividends and buybacks which benefits the 10% of Americans that own 85% of US stocks. Non partisan groups that would normally analyze such a sweeping bill were cut out of the process. Certain Congressional members were kept in the dark. The bil also created many new loopholes that benefit companies and wealthy individuals and has been described by tax experts as "deeply flawed." All while adding over a trillion dollars to the US deficit.

https://publicintegrity.org/business...umps-tax-cuts/

Leftist double talk. The fact that Corporations " got plenty " helps keep Americans employed. Over 50 % of Americans are invested in the stock market directly, and countless others indirectly. Corporations that aren't packing up and moving to China employ Americans, and also may match 401K contributions. Many Corporations also give lump sum contributions to employees depending upon Corporate profits.

These Corporations that " got plenty" , give to Charity and help support area commerce and contribute to the general employment levels in their specific locales. Corporations that set up in China and Mexico don;t do that. If you want to keep American jobs here, you need for Corporations to have the opportunity to grow and invest. And profit is the catalyst that helps drive the engine.

Consumer spending is up , where did that money come from ? Maybe the first wage increases in a decade ? Should we go back to the " new normal " that Obama and the Dems tried to sell us ? Printing money, flat wages, low GDP,adding $ 7-$ 9 trillion to the National Debt. Maybe give away another 10 Billion to GM so they can build plants in China and add 500 dealers in the next decade ? Not to mention the tens of $ billions lost on Green Energy Busts many of whom were Dem cronies.

Are you trying to say that the current economic climate is not better than the climate that existed under Obama?

[Unregistered]

Not true

Just over half (54%) of Americans own stocks, according to a 2017 Gallup report. That includes individual stocks, 401(k) plans, shares in an equity mutual fund or an IRA account. What’s more, two-thirds of Americans do not participate or have access to a 401(k) plan, according to Census Bureau researchers.

In fact, the wealthiest Americans possess more than 80% of the aggregate value of stocks. “Despite the fact that 46% of households owned stock shares either directly or indirectly through mutual funds, trusts, or various pension accounts, the richest 10% of households accounted for 81% of the total value of these stocks, though less than its 91% share of directly owned stocks 22 and mutual funds,

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/he...cks-2018-02-09

[Unregistered]

Not true

Just over half (54%) of Americans own stocks, according to a 2017 Gallup report. That includes individual stocks, 401(k) plans, shares in an equity mutual fund or an IRA account. What’s more, two-thirds of Americans do not participate or have access to a 401(k) plan, according to Census Bureau researchers.

In fact, the wealthiest Americans possess more than 80% of the aggregate value of stocks. “Despite the fact that 46% of households owned stock shares either directly or indirectly through mutual funds, trusts, or various pension accounts, the richest 10% of households accounted for 81% of the total value of these stocks, though less than its 91% share of directly owned stocks 22 and mutual funds,

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/he...cks-2018-02-09

Well then answer a question. Why are 54 % of Americans invested in stocks ? Why not 64 % ? 72 % ? Besides the 1/3 that have 401K plans, is it not a personal decision to invest ? Who is at fault if a person does not invest in the stock market, those that are invested, the rich ? It is their fault that Americans don't invest for retirement also ?

Is there expectation that wealth will be increased without investment?