Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
-
Like someone said it's all about the math. For now the numbers don't add up - there's still too many Repugs clinging on. I'm not even sure a smoking gun would be enough for some to vote for impeachment. The party may encourage him to leave in order to save the party and any shot at 2020 -
talking ma politics
We'll just draw up massive legislation such as HR.1 that is ground breaking and see what the voters think. Oh wait, we did that but McConnell refuses to even debate it and doesn't want the American public to understand what's in the legislation. Who is the one with no intention of governing?Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Hey they wanted to bring the Green New Deal onto the floor, right? Better to have some bullshlt plan pushed around the media than to actually have the details discussed.Comment
-
-
Dream dream, even for a little whileOriginally posted by Unregistered View Post
Dream dream, filling up an idle hour
Dreamin' is free
Dreamin', dreamin' is free
Dreamin', dreamin' is free
Dreamin', dreamin' is freeComment
-
The House investigated Trump.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
The Senate investigated Trump.
The Special Counsel investigated Trump.
Now the SDNY is investigating Trump.
Do you really think Nadler and rest have to investigate Trump?
Or might they actually do what they said they were elected to do - govern.
F ing waste of time!!!
And done strictly for political gain and no other reason.
Dems could give a Schitt about "finding the truth". They only care about regaining power.Comment
-
Tax cut law helps future generations
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini..._Y6BQ6_lgt6ma4
Borrowing to buy an asset that produces more income than the interest expense makes your children richer. The debt doesn’t make them poorer. Without this basic understanding of finance, deficit hawks can’t distinguish deficit-financed consumption from borrowing that increases the economy’s capacity to pay the interest on the borrowed money, including any resulting increase in the interest rate.
The latter makes future generations richer, as the Republican tax cut law does. The cut also spreads these gains across all income levels. A one-time increase in gross domestic product that generations can enjoy for years to come is not a “sugar high.”
In April, the Congressional Budget Office predicted that the tax cut law, which includes the partial expiration of the middle-class tax cuts and repeal of the health care mandate, would eventually increase real GDP and tax revenue beyond CBO’s pre-tax cut estimates.
After raising its growth forecasts, CBO now expects nominal GDP will be nearly $750 billion higher annually — three times higher than its expected impact from the cut — and publicly held federal debt as a percent of GDP will be lower at the end of its 10-year forecast period than before the cut.
Arguably, Republican-controlled government — including its tax cut legislation, business-friendly regulations and conservative judges — made future generations more prosperous than CBO’s original estimate admits. While business tax cuts alone may have grown GDP without significant deficits, it’s unlikely they would have passed without the middle-class cuts. And it’s unlikely growth would have been unleashed if Congress had failed to pass the legislation.Comment
-
The Young Turks, Cenk Uygur: "This is Nancy Pelosi choosing not to do the right thing. Why? Because of politics. Now they have surrendered and Pelosi has said 'we are not going to resist.' Good for ratings, good for fundraising for Democrats! Democrats are more willing to fight Progressives instead of Republicans because they can end money in politics and that's bad for business."Comment
-
ABC's chief national correspondent Terry Moran warned Sunday that if special counsel Robert Mueller finds no evidence that President Trump colluded with Russia during the 2016 election, Democrats and the media will face a "huge... reckoning."
"And if Mueller, after two years, comes back and says, 'I don’t have the evidence to support that charge,' that’s a reckoning," he continued. "That’s a reckoning for progressives and Democrats who hoped that Mueller would essentially erase the 2016 election. It’s a reckoning for the media. It’s a reckoning across the country if in fact after all this time there was no collusion."
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...ml?jwsource=clComment
-
vs the "reckoning" the GOP faced after a four year Benghazi investigation that yielded nothing?Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Actually, they did.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Then the Dems handed the GOP the election. And, they are doing it again.Comment
-
Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an
Even more reason for McConnell to debate it and put it up vote. So why won't he?Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Quiet ?Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Oh ...by that I think the fact that we aren’t really here to spew an ideology like he does ...
It started with a Scott Brown fan club in case you don’t know. Then when they completely lose it some libs step in for balance .
I’ve had no problem not posting . You?
It’s LOVELY though to see others hand him his azz just like when he is here ...the coward just ran away after a particularly bad day and got himself CENSUREDComment
-
Pages and pages and pages of
“Democrats better watch out ....”
2018 last election ....when you guys “reverse the curse” I will listen
Dear god are you dense ? Do you not understand that Nancy could slap trump far harder than congress slapped Clinton? But that she WANTS Dems to run against him?
Not are I agree with letting more damage accrue to
Environment etc myself but she’s calling shots
She hasn’t lost a round to trump yet has she ?Comment
-
^^^^^ Says the guy that said Clinton would win.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
First, old Nance douses progressives' impeachment dreams in cold water now she's dropped another bomb on them by saying 'Medicare for All' would be worse than the current system. Plus, 'How do you pay for that'?
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...erview-797209/Comment
Comment