Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

And you know this how? Prove it. Speculation doesn't count.

I believe what the ODNI, FBI, CIA, and NSA say.
You can believe Russia if you want.

[Unregistered]

LINDSEY GRAHAM: "I've seen no evidence of collusion after two years. Mueller is looking at it, we'll see what he says. But plenty of evidence of corruption at the DOJ and FBI, should be stunning. Not one Democrat seems to care.

Just, like, reverse the roles. Imagine if the Republican Party had paid a foreign agent to go to Russia to get dirt on Hillary Clinton, and they used it to get a warrant, never told the court about it, that'd be a front page story everywhere. That's pretty corrupt -- when the U.S. attorney and the DOJ lawyer say 'it's our job to stop Trump.' Could you imagine what would happen if they'd said 'it is our job to stop Clinton'?"

[Unregistered]

LINDSEY GRAHAM: "I've seen no evidence of collusion after two years. Mueller is looking at it, we'll see what he says. But plenty of evidence of corruption at the DOJ and FBI, should be stunning. Not one Democrat seems to care.

Just, like, reverse the roles. Imagine if the Republican Party had paid a foreign agent to go to Russia to get dirt on Hillary Clinton, and they used it to get a warrant, never told the court about it, that'd be a front page story everywhere. That's pretty corrupt -- when the U.S. attorney and the DOJ lawyer say 'it's our job to stop Trump.' Could you imagine what would happen if they'd said 'it is our job to stop Clinton'?"

The idiot who posted before yours undoubtedly believes Graham works for the Russians.

[Unregistered]

Again, Cons control all the levers of government. Why don’t the Cons investigate and prosecute all the Dem criminal behavior? It’s been two plus years now. What are you waiting for?

You’re all hat and no cattle. Bitch and moan. Bitch and moan.

[Unregistered]

The idiot who posted before yours undoubtedly believes Graham works for the Russians.

No, but Trump sure does. As he put on display for all to see at Helsinki. Traitor.

[Unregistered]

I believe what the ODNI, FBI, CIA, and NSA say.
You can believe Russia if you want.

In other words you have no proof, only supposition via CNN (where Brennan and Clapper work).

[Unregistered]

You need to pay attention. This business of 4 vs. 17 was hashed/rehashed many months ago.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence speaks on behalf of *all* the intelligence agencies. The ODNI says Russia meddled. Wake up.

along with many of the world's top spy agencies.

[Unregistered]

Holy sh*t!!!

This from the WaPo?????

Michael Cohen’s lawyer has severely undermined to the case against Trump

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.f7588fd9667f

[Unregistered]

Uh oh. Looks like another has left the Democrat plantation.

https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...a3&oe=5C39438B

Woods is an oreo - black on the outside, white on the inside. He's also a fool. Respect is earned.

[Unregistered]

In other words you have no proof, only supposition via CNN (where Brennan and Clapper work).

Lol!

So just like Trump, what the FBI, CIA, NSA, and the ODNI who oversees all U.S. intelligence, say isn’t good enough for you. Russia is more credible to you. SMH

[Unregistered]

Lol!

So just like Trump, what the FBI, CIA, NSA, and the ODNI who oversees all U.S. intelligence, say isn’t good enough for you. Russia is more credible to you. SMH

Try, try again.

The whole line began with this post SOURCES: CHINA HACKED HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER

To which one of you lib idiots stated "So I guess that's why every US and multiple foreign intelligence agencies have said for nearly two years it was the Russians, but now it was the Chinese? lmao"

Neither the FBI, the CIA, NSA or the ODNI stated Clinton's emails were hacked by the Russians. The Clinton campaign, the State Department and the FBI in fact stated there was no evidence to support that her emails were hacked. Now we're finding out they were.

The issue of "the consensus of 17 intelligence agencies" is pure media BS undoubtedly sourced to the Clinton campaign in regards to an intelligence assessment which stated: "We assess with high confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election, the consistent goals of which were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency."

The assessment was all confidence and no justification. In fact the NSA believed it with only a “moderate” level of confidence. Had it been the consensus that 17 intelligence agencies agreed that would mean among the agencies that agreed would be the Coast Guard, the Navy, the Air Force, Marines, and drug enforcement. Do you really think they even had access to the assessment?

[Unregistered]

Try, try again.

The whole line began with this post SOURCES: CHINA HACKED HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER

To which one of you lib idiots stated "So I guess that's why every US and multiple foreign intelligence agencies have said for nearly two years it was the Russians, but now it was the Chinese? lmao"

Neither the FBI, the CIA, NSA or the ODNI stated Clinton's emails were hacked by the Russians. The Clinton campaign, the State Department and the FBI in fact stated there was no evidence to support that her emails were hacked. Now we're finding out they were.

The issue of "the consensus of 17 intelligence agencies" is pure media BS undoubtedly sourced to the Clinton campaign in regards to an intelligence assessment which stated: "We assess with high confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election, the consistent goals of which were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency."

The assessment was all confidence and no justification. In fact the NSA believed it with only a “moderate” level of confidence. Had it been the consensus that 17 intelligence agencies agreed that would mean among the agencies that agreed would be the Coast Guard, the Navy, the Air Force, Marines, and drug enforcement. Do you really think they even had access to the assessment?

And in case you are still having comprehension problems an "influence campaign" is a whole lot different than hacking emails. Who hacked Podesta's and the DNC's emails has yet to be determined because the servers were never examined by the FBI.

[Unregistered]

Below are the Key Judgments contained in the Intelligence Community Assessment of Russia's activities with regard to the 2016 election. Continue cherry-picking it and spinning it to your heart's content. Russian dog.

The document is here --> https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

https://preview.ibb.co/iDnB8U/one.jpg

https://preview.ibb.co/fJWhF9/two.jpg

[Unregistered]

You tried to make the weasel claim the NSA had only moderate confidence in all the conclusions. Try again Con.

[Unregistered]

Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security
Release Date: October 7, 2016
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/fi...odni_seals.png

For Immediate Release
DHS Press Office
Contact: 202-282-8010

The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.

Some states have also recently seen scanning and probing of their election-related systems, which in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company. However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government. The USIC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assess that it would be extremely difficult for someone, including a nation-state actor, to alter actual ballot counts or election results by cyber attack or intrusion. This assessment is based on the decentralized nature of our election system in this country and the number of protections state and local election officials have in place. States ensure that voting machines are not connected to the Internet, and there are numerous checks and balances as well as extensive oversight at multiple levels built into our election process.

Nevertheless, DHS continues to urge state and local election officials to be vigilant and seek cybersecurity assistance from DHS. A number of states have already done so. DHS is providing several services to state and local election officials to assist in their cybersecurity. These services include cyber “hygiene” scans of Internet-facing systems, risk and vulnerability assessments, information sharing about cyber incidents, and best practices for securing voter registration databases and addressing potential cyber threats. DHS has convened an Election Infrastructure Cybersecurity Working Group with experts across all levels of government to raise awareness of cybersecurity risks potentially affecting election infrastructure and the elections process. Secretary Johnson and DHS officials are working directly with the National Association of Secretaries of State to offer assistance, share information, and provide additional resources to state and local officials.