Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Trends, TMan, trends.

Spin it how you will, but now we have three polls all showing support for Trumps' SOTUS and [b]NOT]/b] your contention that "Trump gets least positive reaction in at least 20 years".

ADDITIONALLY just more evidence of the bias in media that 1.) CNN would post those headlines not supported by the actual contents of their own poll and 2.) CBS won't even report their numbers to the general public.

But there is more! And it comes from the CEO of the Harvard Harris polling company who was an adviser to both Bill and Hillary Clinton.

It’s not spin, just basic math. Something you apparently know little about.

You saw the 43% and you pee’d your pants you were so excited! Lol.


Still not him, btw.

[Unregistered]

Bore-us is going to spam all day long in an attempt to deflect and distract from the embarrassing memo face-plant. Let us know when you have some indictments and guilty pleas, umkay? Even just one indictment. Just one single solitary indictment. Can you manage that?

Until then you’re just all hat no cattle. A spam bot.

[Unregistered]

Bore-us is going to spam all day long in an attempt to deflect and distract from the embarrassing memo face-plant. Let us know when you have some indictments and guilty pleas, umkay? Even just one indictment. Just one single solitary indictment. Can you manage that?

Until then you’re just all hat no cattle. A spam bot.

There's been 4 indictments so far. More coming.

[Unregistered]

There's been 4 indictments so far. More coming.

Yes, you are correct.
4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas. All of Trump officials and associates. And more coming. Many more.

And one big goose egg on the other side of the ledger.

[Unregistered]

"Adam Schiff, Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi, among seemingly dozens of Democrats, not to mention half the mainstream media, had been warning us for days that the release of the memo authored by Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee would place our national security at grave risk. "Sources and methods" would be revealed.

Now that we have seen the memo, it's clear that was an absolutely bald-faced lie of the most obvious sort. Nothing in it impacts national security in the slightest. There's no mention whatsoever of any "sources and methods." Unless they were lobotomized, those Democrats and their dependable PR team (aka the media) must have realized they were blatantly lying to the American public."

Like it or not, even revealing the existence of a FISA warrant, let alone the named target is prohibited. Just because the subject of Carter Page was leaked and/or inferred does not make it legal to just go ahead and publish it. And the info about Papadopoulos, while understated in the memo, was from a source that while also has been leaked, is probably protected and made official. There were tons of other nation's Intel agencies that also contributed info in the early days.

And yeah, the Dems' protests were a little overwrought.

[Unregistered]

Before the left pulls out one more strand of hair in anger, or makes one more banshee scream of outrage on cable news or in social media over “the memo,” I’d like them to at least have the decency to consider the following:

What if it came out that a Republican-funded opposition research dossier against presidential candidate Barack Obama was used to obtain a secret FISA warrant to put Obama’s aides under surveillance and take him down?

And what if the federal judge who granted the warrant wasn’t told that the partisan oppo-research was the basis of the surveillance warrant?

Or, what if senior FBI officials running the investigation of Obama had expressed loathing for the candidate and his voters?

What would the Democratic Media Complex be doing?

Democrats were once adamantly opposed to even suspected abuses by federal police and the intelligence agencies — what is now called “the Deep State” — and they railed against those who’d step on American civil liberties in a political hunt.

But now, Democrats are the champions of shadow warriors in the CIA and the FBI.

Q) What if it came out that a Republican-funded opposition research dossier against presidential candidate Barack Obama was used to obtain a secret FISA warrant to put Obama’s aides under surveillance and take him down?

A) They wouldn't have found that he was colluding/conspiring/coordinating with the Russians!

Q) And what if the federal judge who granted the warrant wasn’t told that the partisan oppo-research was the basis of the surveillance warrant?

A) the judge would be like: "gee. I wonder who took the time to write up this dossier? Probably Barrack's campaign director... Maybe his mom?"

Q) Or, what if senior FBI officials running the investigation of Obama had expressed loathing for the candidate and his voters?

A) Who's to say they wouldn't have personal fear and loathing of him? They'd be expected to do their job without partisan bias. But we can talk about the bias in the "Trumpland" NY FBI office that conspired with Giuliani, "Judge" Piro, Hannity, etc. to delay the Weiner laptop investigation and pressure Comey into re-opening the emails witchhunt days before the election if you want...

Q) What would the Democratic Media Complex be doing?

A) Pretty much the same thing.

[Unregistered]

Yes, you are correct.
4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas. All of Trump officials and associates. And more coming. Many more.

And one big goose egg on the other side of the ledger.

Watergate had 69 indictments, with 48 guilty pleas or convictions. it was 2 years and a few months from the break in until Nixon resigned but legal activity ran much longer. Republicans investigated Benghazi for nearly four years. But for this complicated mess, which started in May, the GOP is screaming to "end it now", "it's taking too long", "nothing there".

I can wait. I'd like them to get it right no matter what the outcome. In the meantime instead of drafting useless memos it would great if Congress would take some action against future Russian election hacking. Regardless if you believe it had an influence or not, they did hack and in many places. They've already created the distrust in the process they were aiming for. If trust isn't repaired quickly it many never be and this Democracy is fuked

[Unregistered]

Politico: Why Carter Page was worth Watching.

Interesting read...

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...es-memo-216934

[Unregistered]

Interesting read...

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...es-memo-216934

Very interesting.

Here we are approaching the endgame and two of the biggest clowns in the Trump Circus, Nunes and Page, have taken Center Ring. Soon the Barker himself will join them. Water always seeks its own level.

[Unregistered]

Interesting read...

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...es-memo-216934

Plenty of smoke, but no fire. Written like a novel.
“ spent lavishly and drove a Mercedes”
Not a Russian car ?

[Unregistered]

Plenty of smoke, but no fire. Written like a novel.
“ spent lavishly and drove a Mercedes”
Not a Russian car ?

touche!

It looks like this article is an excerpt from a book called "Collusion", so it certainly has a "Woolfe-like" narrative to it.

Seems that everyone is being fooled into thinking that any one thread of this whole affair is the "silver bullet", that every aspect has to check out 100%. Smoke but no fire is a perfect way to put it. There's a sh!tload of smoke! Often that means there's fire.

The title of the article is "Why Carter Page was worth Watching". That's it. Not "Carter Page Proves Rump Colluded with Russia! Not everyone was aware of the history, and the 2013 stuff. (Maddow had discussed it months ago) The point is to show that as idiotic and low-level as he might be... he was on the radar as a known compromised Russian (agent, asset, dupe, patsy, you choose the word) and when other indications started coming in (Papadolpouos) it was worth "Taking a look at". It's not the end all be all of the investigation just a thread. The less important the thread, the less impact on the anti-investigation narrative.

[Unregistered]

The moral of the story is...

“There was a simple way of avoiding U.S. surveillance and a FISA court warrant. It could be summed up like this: Don’t hang out with Russian spies.“

[Unregistered]

http://www.caglecartoons.com/media/c...206016_600.jpg

[Unregistered]

http://www.caglecartoons.com/media/c...206016_600.jpg

https://media0.giphy.com/media/YPrbLyXjoqZRC/giphy.gif

[Unregistered]

Cartoons and Democrats can't distract from this fact:

"The FBI and the intelligence agencies have a long and documented history of such abuse. This includes the targeting of political leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King." - Jonathan Turkey, Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School