Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Worcester Thugs
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
I have to say after looking at the video thst the ref should have gave a red card to the goalie for showing and using both cleats on the Worcester N. Player, plan and simple. I do not live in any of those towns but fair is fair. Just because the other team had black players does not mean they should call the game that way.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
WOW nice way to ruin a post I agreed with by throwing in the race card. I honestly think the goalie's action was deserving of a red card. Not sure of the reason the worcester player got a card though because I can't see anything but I'll look at it again.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWOW nice way to ruin a post I agreed with by throwing in the race card. I honestly think the goalie's action was deserving of a red card. Not sure of the reason the worcester player got a card though because I can't see anything but I'll look at it again.
Well, I don't blame the Worcester N. Players being upset that the goalie did not get a card and they refs are to be blamed.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
This has been beaten to death, at least the ending, and nothing is going to change the fact that Ludlow is again state champs. Remarkable accomplishment really.
But the title of this thread is a little much, especially given that it does play on stereotypes and is based on a very small amount of data from a very short video clip. I mean, I'm assuming the Ludlow Lions are not the "Ludlow Angels" (in contrast to Worcester Thugs). Maybe the game was chippy from beginning to end. In the video of the game there appears to be a fairly aggressive challenge on the Worcester GK. I'm guessing there was quite a bit of trash-talking during the game, and I'm guessing Ludlow, at least, gave as good as they got. And whether the Ludlow GK should have received a yellow or red or whatever, he did not use the best judgment retaliating at that point in the game with his team clinging to a 1 goal lead.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
In another thread, there were questions as to whether or not Ludlow players had earned red-cards in the state semi-final match, however, these red-cards, after discussion with the Ludlow coach were rescinded. Do I have inaccurate facts???
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
IMO this clip only shows the contact between the Worcester striker and the Ludlow GK was nothing. The fact that the GK kicked out means he should have been carded.
BTW there was some contact between the Worcester GK and a Ludlow player at about the 25 second mark which actually looks a little more intense (watch the GK's head snap back), but the difference was the GK didn't react by striking out at the Ludlow player.
Sorry, Ludlow, this incident tarnishes your state championship, because your keeper should have been ejected and shouldn't have been playing in the finals.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIMO this clip only shows the contact between the Worcester striker and the Ludlow GK was nothing. The fact that the GK kicked out means he should have been carded.
BTW there was some contact between the Worcester GK and a Ludlow player at about the 25 second mark which actually looks a little more intense (watch the GK's head snap back), but the difference was the GK didn't react by striking out at the Ludlow player.
Sorry, Ludlow, this incident tarnishes your state championship, because your keeper should have been ejected and shouldn't have been playing in the finals.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe MIAA doesn't think there is a problem. Guaranteed. You had a Sutton official in the middle for their state semi game (always happens during the tournament boys and girls.............didn't affect the outcome of the game this time). What this is called is incompetent assigning and it needs to be fixed. Average age of the officials for the North/Ludlow game was at least 60+. No idea who the guy was in the middle but the linesman were 65+. Sorry but it is not coaching. How do you expect guys that old to keep up with athletic 14-18 year old boys.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe MIAA doesn't think there is a problem. Guaranteed. You had a Sutton official in the middle for their state semi game (always happens during the tournament boys and girls.............didn't affect the outcome of the game this time). What this is called is incompetent assigning and it needs to be fixed. Average age of the officials for the North/Ludlow game was at least 60+. No idea who the guy was in the middle but the linesman were 65+. Sorry but it is not coaching. How do you expect guys that old to keep up with athletic 14-18 year old boys.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Comment