Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Maple BU11 Spring 2010

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Maple BU11 Spring 2010

    There are 6 groups of 10 teams this fall in Maple BU11. What does Maple do with 60 BU11 teams come spring? How many bottom teams tend to drop out? Will Blue still only have 8 teams and the rest 10 teams like last spring? (only 30 BU11 teams then) Can't remember a fall when there were this many BU11 teams.

    #2
    Can't remember a fall when there were this many BU11 teams.[/QUOTE]

    They are playing 8v8... so every club has two teams...

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Can't remember a fall when there were this many BU11 teams.
      They are playing 8v8... so every club has two teams...[/QUOTE]

      Got it. How many teams tend to drop out fall to spring at U11?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Can't remember a fall when there were this many BU11 teams.
        They are playing 8v8... so every club has two teams...[/QUOTE]

        Out of 60 teams, only 14 have repeats. There are 45 clubs represented. That is still some sort of record for BU11 Maple.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          They are playing 8v8... so every club has two teams...
          Out of 60 teams, only 14 have repeats. There are 45 clubs represented. That is still some sort of record for BU11 Maple.[/QUOTE]

          Only 29 clubs represented in BU11 Maple this time last year. Eight of those clubs are MIA this year. Almost 25 new "clubs" in fall BU11 is a big jump.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Out of 60 teams, only 14 have repeats. There are 45 clubs represented. That is still some sort of record for BU11 Maple.
            Only 29 clubs represented in BU11 Maple this time last year. Eight of those clubs are MIA this year. Almost 25 new "clubs" in fall BU11 is a big jump.[/QUOTE]

            And a ton of terrible teams out there. I wont criticize a player at this age but some coaches and club administrators have to get a clue when entering a team into MAPLE. There are some teams out there losing by 8-6-8 goals per week. Tell me how that is productive for either team.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Only 29 clubs represented in BU11 Maple this time last year. Eight of those clubs are MIA this year. Almost 25 new "clubs" in fall BU11 is a big jump.
              And a ton of terrible teams out there. I wont criticize a player at this age but some coaches and club administrators have to get a clue when entering a team into MAPLE. There are some teams out there losing by 8-6-8 goals per week. Tell me how that is productive for either team.[/QUOTE]

              In our bracket, some are losing by 8 - 11 points. It's pretty ugy.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                And a ton of terrible teams out there. I wont criticize a player at this age but some coaches and club administrators have to get a clue when entering a team into MAPLE. There are some teams out there losing by 8-6-8 goals per week. Tell me how that is productive for either team.
                In our bracket, some are losing by 8 - 11 points. It's pretty ugy.[/QUOTE]

                I think some of it has to do with U11 8v8 being a new thing this fall for MAPLE. Part of the U11 league's structure in MAPLE is geographic in nature to limit travel, whereas the MASC fall U12 8v8 league doesn't have nearly as many teams and travel burdens are heavier. Definitely some of the new single teams and even many of the more established clubs' second teams should probably be in MASC, but the smaller fields and difference in physical development at this age are gonna cause some blowouts, but I agree, certainly should not be as much as it is happening this fall.

                Comment


                  #9
                  From what I understand, an explosion of new teams applied to MAPLE and despite trying to block it, a legal component prevented MAPLE from controlling how many clubs may join. Now you have a ridiculous number of clubs in the system and a huge dilution of play. A few years ago there were three U11 divisions. The first two from each and the next three best records went to the blue division. Now you will get the first place teams and only 3-4 of the second place teams. This is ridiculous.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    From what I understand, an explosion of new teams applied to MAPLE and despite trying to block it, a legal component prevented MAPLE from controlling how many clubs may join. Now you have a ridiculous number of clubs in the system and a huge dilution of play. A few years ago there were three U11 divisions. The first two from each and the next three best records went to the blue division. Now you will get the first place teams and only 3-4 of the second place teams. This is ridiculous.
                    look for the better clubs starting to migrate out of maple. The original charter of maple, being a league for premier soccer clubs, is being lost by their inabiltly to stop anyone from forming a club/team with no credentials or qualifications other than being a town coach thinking it is a good idea

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      look for the better clubs starting to migrate out of maple. The original charter of maple, being a league for premier soccer clubs, is being lost by their inabiltly to stop anyone from forming a club/team with no credentials or qualifications other than being a town coach thinking it is a good idea
                      Where exactly do you expect these teams "migrate" to? NEP?? The three club league? What a joke! Just because there is an explosion of teams in Maple doesn't mean there will be less competition. If anything, it will increase it. The cream will rise to the top, which is where the competition is and was and will be. 60 vs 30 teams competing for 8 spots in the blue division does not dilute the competition, it increases it.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        They are playing 8v8... so every club has two teams...
                        Out of 60 teams, only 14 have repeats. There are 45 clubs represented. That is still some sort of record for BU11 Maple.[/QUOTE]

                        Wouldn't that be on target with past years that had 40-50 teams playing 11v11 and only a few entering more than one team?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Where exactly do you expect these teams "migrate" to? NEP?? The three club league? What a joke! Just because there is an explosion of teams in Maple doesn't mean there will be less competition. If anything, it will increase it. The cream will rise to the top, which is where the competition is and was and will be. 60 vs 30 teams competing for 8 spots in the blue division does not dilute the competition, it increases it.
                          Yes, and let's not forget that the mighty MPS Maple cellar dwellars LOST to JP "mom and pop" Kicks. If Maple is diluted because of these "mom and pop" clubs what does this say about MPS?

                          Comment


                            #14
                            More compeditive MAPLE league

                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            look for the better clubs starting to migrate out of maple. The original charter of maple, being a league for premier soccer clubs, is being lost by their inabiltly to stop anyone from forming a club/team with no credentials or qualifications other than being a town coach thinking it is a good idea

                            The league needs to be more competitive, both of the Bolts U10 teams are undefeated and the Bolts U11 team only lost one game.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              The more kids playing soccer the better.

                              MAPLE should stop with the "premier" focus and provide enough divisions for everyone to play at their level. If they did it right there would be no need for MASC.

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X