Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Forde and her family had to leave their home becauseof death threats. And cons wonder why she didn't want to be named?
    Someone leaked who she was. 99% to 100% chance it was a Democratic operative.

    Did she call the police? Can we prove this?

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Someone leaked who she was. 99% to 100% chance it was a Democratic operative.

      Did she call the police? Can we prove this?
      Ask Donald Trump, he will tell the truth.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Stormy didn’t seem to mind slobbering the mushroom at the time. She even called a friend to bring a third person in the mix. Sounds like a scorned woman to me. Didn’t get to win the apprentice and the money stopped flowing
        You don't have a lot of experience with women, do you?

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Someone leaked who she was. 99% to 100% chance it was a Democratic operative.

          Did she call the police? Can we prove this?
          So ford wants the fbi to investigate a high school party from 35 years ago now before she will testify. Quote, “she needs to prepare”. Prepare for what exactly. Just has to speak the truth and give facts. If she needs to prepare, it is because she need to be feed the script, plain and simple, like her.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            So ford wants the fbi to investigate a high school party from 35 years ago now before she will testify. Quote, “she needs to prepare”. Prepare for what exactly. Just has to speak the truth and give facts. If she needs to prepare, it is because she need to be feed the script, plain and simple, like her.
            Needs to prepare on how to deal with the Fuktard GOP Senators who will go off course in the
            Q & A ... you know it’ll be something like this “ Mrs Ford does it turn you on to be choked while being Sodomized, and if so isn’t it true that you begged Judge Kavanaugh repeatedly to perform rough sex using dildos and broomsticks?”

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Needs to prepare on how to deal with the Fuktard GOP Senators who will go off course in the
              Q & A ... you know it’ll be something like this “ Mrs Ford does it turn you on to be choked while being Sodomized, and if so isn’t it true that you begged Judge Kavanaugh repeatedly to perform rough sex using dildos and broomsticks?”
              Senator Blumenthal please go to bed. Put down the bottle, put on your pants and go to bed.

              P.S. Dr. Ford has tapped out. Another footnote of the resistance.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                So ford wants the fbi to investigate a high school party from 35 years ago now before she will testify. Quote, “she needs to prepare”. Prepare for what exactly. Just has to speak the truth and give facts. If she needs to prepare, it is because she need to be feed the script, plain and simple, like her.
                Sadly, men like you, Kavanaugh, and his buddy Mark Judge apparently view clasping ones hand over an unwilling 15 yo’s mouth while your buddy helps out as “tough horseplay”

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Sadly, men like you, Kavanaugh, and his buddy Mark Judge apparently view clasping ones hand over an unwilling 15 yo’s mouth while your buddy helps out as “tough horseplay”
                  How stupid are you? This never happened. Not ever. I’d be willing to guess that Kavanaugh never even met the woman before. In her mind, she might have some long lost memory that she thinks happened. Maybe she was wasted. Maybe there was some other guy that she confused for him. But if it really happened, she would have come forward long before now. He’s only gone through 6 different confirmations. If something as traumatic as this happened, she would certainly know more details. She remembers only enough details that are hard to refute. If she was more specific, it would be easy to disprove. Vague and smearing. Hoping that the mere appearance of impropriety will be enough to derail this guy’s nomination. If she was lying, I said two things would happen. 1) She wouldn’t testify, because she knows her story would get blown to bits. 2) She would not have one shred of credible evidence to support her claims.

                  Both are now coming true. The only thing worse than someone doing what he allegedly did, is for someone to make up a false claim that someone did this. Bring forward another witness. Some detail of a party. Residence. Number of people in attendance. Did she know him? If not, how did she even know who the heck he was? There are people I went to high school with and was friends with, whose names I struggle to remember now. This doesn’t pass the smell test. The timing is suspicious. If I didn’t want this to get out, I certainly would put my faith in a congressman. LOL. Might as well let a crackhead know. She’s been paid off and now that he has refused to go away quietly and is pushing back, she’s screwed.

                  Dems should worry far more about their entire party getting blown to the moon with the released FISA warrants and text messages. Why are they so concerned about them coming out? They are scrambling like a bunch of rats in a half sunk ship. All are going down. Comey. McCabe. Strzok. Page. Rosenstein. Some are even republicans. All will be exposed and then it’s $20,000 an hour on the lecture circuit after jail time. This move will cost the Dems the House again. Senate was never moving over. President is a lock. Now the SC for the next 30-40 years. Couldn’t happen to a bigger bunch of idiots.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    I don't agree. It's a serious accusation regarding someone who is up for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land. It should be explored futher.
                    Explore what exactly? There is no proof. She doesn’t know the address. Who was there. How many people total. What are they going to explore? You have crossed into dangerous territory here. Now with the partisan divide, all anyone needs to do is make up an accusation to derail a nomination? Just say something that can’t be proven or disproven and people will assume the worst. Back up the accusation with some proof, or apologize and go away. It doesn’t matter to most people whether or not this guy gets confirmed. But I hate to see people falsely accused. If this was true, she would have started impeachment proceedings for his current court. That would have blocked his nomination for the SC in itself. But no. Let’s wait until the week of the vote to come forward. She won’t testify because she knows she is a liar. Here’s something else to think about. If she had no intention of coming forward, why did she need to take a lie detector test? Who exactly would she be trying to prove her story to? Her therapist? Who paid for it? Who ordered her to do it? Follow the money. It always leads to the truth.

                    Comment


                      Let’s have some consistency at least. Can we discuss the accusations against Keith Ellison? How many feminist, progressive Dems have pushed for answers on those very credible allegations? ZERO. None. Nada.

                      Allegations were last year. Not 35 years ago. Allegations were specific. Very specific records from a therapist were recorded and released.

                      Crickets. Hypocrisy.

                      Confirm Kacanagh.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Let’s have some consistency at least. Can we discuss the accusations against Keith Ellison? How many feminist, progressive Dems have pushed for answers on those very credible allegations? ZERO. None. Nada.

                        Allegations were last year. Not 35 years ago. Allegations were specific. Very specific records from a therapist were recorded and released.

                        Crickets. Hypocrisy.

                        Confirm Kacanagh.
                        The fact ford has said she wants the fbi to investigate this high crime committed 35 years ago tells you all you need to know. Why didn’t she want someone to investigate 35 years ago?

                        Is she a democrat? A pussyhat march on Washington trump hater?

                        Probably.

                        Let’s go out on a crazy limb here and say he did put his hand over her mouth. Was it in jest? Couple of teens hanging out partying and one playfully, in the company of other puts his hand over someone’s mouth. For example. I tell you something that I don’t want others to hear and you start telling others and I say stop and try and cover your mouth so you don’t repeat my secret. Totally different then me putting my hand over your mouth to rape or suffocate you, but factually correct none the less.

                        Was she in the room because she was attracted to him. Were they kissing and he tried to cop a feel and she said no and he stopped and she left the room? Crime? If so, you better not let your teen out of your house until they are out of high school. Again, factually true, but not a crime and certainly not something for the fbi to investigate, now or 35 years ago.

                        Smear campaign. She wrote a letter to a senator and it got away from her. If she wanted to report it, why not go straight to the police or straight to the news media. Why send a letter to a senator. At a minimum , why not pick up the phone and call the senator with such important facts. Why potentially risk the letter being read by a staffer for the senator and cast aside?

                        Of course she wanted to be anonymous, but did she really think this through. Bring up an allegation against a Supreme Court nominee from 35 years ago, but don’t expect to have to testify? What does she need to prepare for? She has had 35 years or at least. A month and a half since she wrote the letter. Is more time going to help her remember the facts? She is no Anita Hill. Anita Hill didn’t need 35 years or time to prepare. When you are asked questions and tell the truth, you don’t need to prepare. Guilty people and liars prepare a narrative.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Let’s have some consistency at least. Can we discuss the accusations against Keith Ellison? How many feminist, progressive Dems have pushed for answers on those very credible allegations? ZERO. None. Nada.

                          Allegations were last year. Not 35 years ago. Allegations were specific. Very specific records from a therapist were recorded and released.

                          Crickets. Hypocrisy.

                          Confirm Kacanagh.
                          The Democrats have done well with their own ( Al Franken and others ) been forced out by their own Democratic Party leaders and for far less than those accused Republicans that still continue to serve.
                          The Republicans and this President worked extremely hard for months to nominate for the Alabama Senate race Roy Moore.
                          A grown man who had preyed on dozens of young HS women and on two Occasions attempted to rape them.
                          If it wasn’t for a few thousand DECENT Republicans who came to their senses , the Pervert would be in Congress right now.

                          Crickets NO ... as we discuss Ellison on TS he is being investigated by his own party as should Kavanaugh, if it’s Overwhelming enough then Ellison should be removed as should Kavanaugh.

                          What’s the Rush? Kavanaugh seems like a fine Gentleman so he and others shouldn’t be concerned if there’s no there there.
                          So what’s the Rush?
                          Remember Judge Garland was nominated in March of 2016 and didn’t even get a hearing from a Republican controlled Senate —- not even a hearing! He had no blemishes whatsoever and the Republicans knew that and didn’t want the American people to see a quality non controversial left leaning nomination from Obama.
                          The Republicans used an excuse it was an Election year which Is not true.
                          Reagan nominated his Right leaning nomination in his final year of his two term Presidency also in an Election year with a Democratic controlled Senate. That Senate granted and finally approved his pick which cleared, that Judge was Anthony Kennedy the same judge that just retired. Democrat Senate leaders saw him back then has a good Judge not a Democrat or a Republican and chose to agree with their rival party across the isle.

                          Decency, Fairness and the right to be heard matters over party preference.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            The fact ford has said she wants the fbi to investigate this high crime committed 35 years ago tells you all you need to know. Why didn’t she want someone to investigate 35 years ago?

                            Is she a democrat? A pussyhat march on Washington trump hater?

                            Probably.

                            Let’s go out on a crazy limb here and say he did put his hand over her mouth. Was it in jest? Couple of teens hanging out partying and one playfully, in the company of other puts his hand over someone’s mouth. For example. I tell you something that I don’t want others to hear and you start telling others and I say stop and try and cover your mouth so you don’t repeat my secret. Totally different then me putting my hand over your mouth to rape or suffocate you, but factually correct none the less.

                            Was she in the room because she was attracted to him. Were they kissing and he tried to cop a feel and she said no and he stopped and she left the room? Crime? If so, you better not let your teen out of your house until they are out of high school. Again, factually true, but not a crime and certainly not something for the fbi to investigate, now or 35 years ago.

                            Smear campaign. She wrote a letter to a senator and it got away from her. If she wanted to report it, why not go straight to the police or straight to the news media. Why send a letter to a senator. At a minimum , why not pick up the phone and call the senator with such important facts. Why potentially risk the letter being read by a staffer for the senator and cast aside?

                            Of course she wanted to be anonymous, but did she really think this through. Bring up an allegation against a Supreme Court nominee from 35 years ago, but don’t expect to have to testify? What does she need to prepare for? She has had 35 years or at least. A month and a half since she wrote the letter. Is more time going to help her remember the facts? She is no Anita Hill. Anita Hill didn’t need 35 years or time to prepare. When you are asked questions and tell the truth, you don’t need to prepare. Guilty people and liars prepare a narrative.
                            Well said and I would add there is a reason we have statues of limitations. This may have been a crime when and if it happened but the statue of limitations would have been 1 year. Ford could have told her parents or friends and they may have guided her on the situation but so far there doesn’t seem to be any evidence of that. In addition this would have been local law enforcement’s responsibly. You can’t just fast forward 36 years and dictate the start and conditions of a federal investigation to elected officials on your behalf after more than ample time and opportunities to do so. Kavanaugh’s name has been on Trump’s Supreme Court list for over 2 years. If she was so concerned she could have inserted herself when the list first came out. This is clearly only a political tactic and she is complicit in it.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              The Democrats have done well with their own ( Al Franken and others ) been forced out by their own Democratic Party leaders and for far less than those accused Republicans that still continue to serve.
                              The Republicans and this President worked extremely hard for months to nominate for the Alabama Senate race Roy Moore.
                              A grown man who had preyed on dozens of young HS women and on two Occasions attempted to rape them.
                              If it wasn’t for a few thousand DECENT Republicans who came to their senses , the Pervert would be in Congress right now.

                              Crickets NO ... as we discuss Ellison on TS he is being investigated by his own party as should Kavanaugh, if it’s Overwhelming enough then Ellison should be removed as should Kavanaugh.

                              What’s the Rush? Kavanaugh seems like a fine Gentleman so he and others shouldn’t be concerned if there’s no there there.
                              So what’s the Rush?
                              Remember Judge Garland was nominated in March of 2016 and didn’t even get a hearing from a Republican controlled Senate —- not even a hearing! He had no blemishes whatsoever and the Republicans knew that and didn’t want the American people to see a quality non controversial left leaning nomination from Obama.
                              The Republicans used an excuse it was an Election year which Is not true.
                              Reagan nominated his Right leaning nomination in his final year of his two term Presidency also in an Election year with a Democratic controlled Senate. That Senate granted and finally approved his pick which cleared, that Judge was Anthony Kennedy the same judge that just retired. Democrat Senate leaders saw him back then has a good Judge not a Democrat or a Republican and chose to agree with their rival party across the isle.

                              Decency, Fairness and the right to be heard matters over party preference.
                              she has the right to be heard but he also has the right of the presumption of innocence
                              she has to prove what she said happened-
                              he doesnt have to prove that he didnt do it

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                The Democrats have done well with their own ( Al Franken and others ) been forced out by their own Democratic Party leaders and for far less than those accused Republicans that still continue to serve.
                                The Republicans and this President worked extremely hard for months to nominate for the Alabama Senate race Roy Moore.
                                A grown man who had preyed on dozens of young HS women and on two Occasions attempted to rape them.
                                If it wasn’t for a few thousand DECENT Republicans who came to their senses , the Pervert would be in Congress right now.

                                Crickets NO ... as we discuss Ellison on TS he is being investigated by his own party as should Kavanaugh, if it’s Overwhelming enough then Ellison should be removed as should Kavanaugh.

                                What’s the Rush? Kavanaugh seems like a fine Gentleman so he and others shouldn’t be concerned if there’s no there there.
                                So what’s the Rush?
                                Remember Judge Garland was nominated in March of 2016 and didn’t even get a hearing from a Republican controlled Senate —- not even a hearing! He had no blemishes whatsoever and the Republicans knew that and didn’t want the American people to see a quality non controversial left leaning nomination from Obama.
                                The Republicans used an excuse it was an Election year which Is not true.
                                Reagan nominated his Right leaning nomination in his final year of his two term Presidency also in an Election year with a Democratic controlled Senate. That Senate granted and finally approved his pick which cleared, that Judge was Anthony Kennedy the same judge that just retired. Democrat Senate leaders saw him back then has a good Judge not a Democrat or a Republican and chose to agree with their rival party across the isle.

                                Decency, Fairness and the right to be heard matters over party preference.
                                Some history for you

                                The republicans used the nuclear option to eliminate the supreme court appointee 60 vote rule to close a debate, requiring only 51 votes. Liberals cried it was unfair. Yet the nuclear option that removed the 60 vote rule was invoked first by Harry Reid in 2013 to jam obama appointees through. He did this because obama pissed the senate republicans off by jamming through appointees during senate recess in 2012.

                                So the father of the nuke option was a democrat and it was fathered because of obamas unpartisan behavior of sneaking around the senate.

                                So look no further than Barry to blame for your current situation.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X