Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

[Unregistered]

That's very fascist of you. Well done.

Obama had no issues weaponizing the IRS among many other agencies. Elections have consequences, did Barry say that.

Good for the goose, good for the gander.

Guessing you were real quiet when your dear leader was targeting conservatives.

[Unregistered]

I do firmly believe that if you're serving the public in ANY capacity you have to serve everyone - regardless of politics, race, religion, gender....But at the same time I do think it's funny that some righties are getting a taste of what it's like to be treated differently just because they are (fill in the blank).

I thought the Civil Right movement was 50 years ago. I thought we were past this stuff.

I am OK with all of it but there are consequences. Lost business, violence, etc. No whining when it goes against you as well. You can't pick and choose who gets to be bigoted. Both sides. Ugly and unnecessary but if that is what everyone wants, no whining.

[Unregistered]

Trump FukTARTs are far worse than any hate group.

I’m on the side of the Uber guy and the Restaurant person and anyone else who doesn’t want to serve these FukTARTs... because they are scum! Worse than the white supremacy Racists, the FukTARTs are every hate group wrapped up as one.
I guess you can call them the everything party just like an everything bagel.

[Unregistered]

I’m on the side of the Uber guy and the Restaurant person and anyone else who doesn’t want to serve these FukTARTs... because they are scum! Worse than the white supremacy Racists, the FukTARTs are every hate group wrapped up as one.
I guess you can call them the everything party just like an everything bagel.

The lefties are scraping the bottom looking for spokespeople these days!

Who let Blumenthal on here?

[Unregistered]

I’m on the side of the Uber guy and the Restaurant person and anyone else who doesn’t want to serve these FukTARTs... because they are scum! Worse than the white supremacy Racists, the FukTARTs are every hate group wrapped up as one.
I guess you can call them the everything party just like an everything bagel.

This Snowflake blew a fuse.

[Unregistered]

Someone was praising Trump for the NK "deal." There is no deal, NK wouldn't stick to it anyway, and today Trump started to back peddle on that "deal" saying "We have no time limit. We have no speed limit."

And yes, he and Putin talked about that too in that closed meeting.

"Trump said he discussed North Korea with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday at their summit in Helsinki. "President Putin is going to be involved in the sense that he is with us," Trump said.



https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-now...221458102.html

And the problem is?

[Unregistered]

Obama had no issues weaponizing the IRS among many other agencies. Elections have consequences, did Barry say that.

Good for the goose, good for the gander.

Guessing you were real quiet when your dear leader was targeting conservatives.

A subsequent review revealed the IRS focused on over 400 groups, conservative and liberal" “they seem to have caught everybody,” and if anything the criteria were overly broad, he added.
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/28...-groups-report

But now, The Trump WH has made IRS donations even murkier than they already were:

"Certain tax-exempt groups will no longer be required to provide the names and addresses of donors to the IRS on annual forms under guidance that the Treasury Department and IRS released Monday evening.

Under federal law, charitable organizations that are tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) have to provide to the IRS information about the names and addresses of substantial donors. The IRS has required other types of tax-exempt organizations — including 501(c)(4) groups that advocate for specific policies, such as the National Rifle Association and the Koch brothers-backed Americans for Prosperity — to also provide the agency with that information."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...Money-for-2018

Regardless of party I think we can all agree all Americans have the right to know where the money is coming from.

[Unregistered]

And the problem is?

You are part of the problem

[Unregistered]

A subsequent review revealed the IRS focused on over 400 groups, conservative and liberal" “they seem to have caught everybody,” and if anything the criteria were overly broad, he added.
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/28...-groups-report

But now, The Trump WH has made IRS donations even murkier than they already were:

"Certain tax-exempt groups will no longer be required to provide the names and addresses of donors to the IRS on annual forms under guidance that the Treasury Department and IRS released Monday evening.

Under federal law, charitable organizations that are tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) have to provide to the IRS information about the names and addresses of substantial donors. The IRS has required other types of tax-exempt organizations — including 501(c)(4) groups that advocate for specific policies, such as the National Rifle Association and the Koch brothers-backed Americans for Prosperity — to also provide the agency with that information."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...Money-for-2018

Regardless of party I think we can all agree all Americans have the right to know where the money is coming from.

From an IRS perspective, and a general principle in auditing, you would need to know who donors are in order to "match" with the deduction being taken by the donor, so that you can verify the donation.

I find the disturbing that this principle is being rejected. Bad business, bad for ethics.

[Unregistered]

The answer is he picked them up, but pulled over and dropped them off at a gas station 10 miles from thier final destination because he overheard them talking about thier republican work.

Regardless, even if he simply refused them service, how ir that different than restaurants and hotels refusing black customers. You aren’t for that are you? But you are ok if you don’t agree with thier political views?

No, I'm of the belief that a private enterprise can refuse to do business with anyone they choose.

An enterprising free market will react to serve those not served, and possibly punish those who refuse to serve for seemingly foolish reasons.

I know, it's crazy.

[Unregistered]

And the problem is?

Hahaha. The problem is it is quite likely that Russia and North Korea are both colluding against the USA.

Do you think it's at all possible that Russia helped NK with radioactive matter, missile technology, etc.?

You remember the Cold War, Korean War, yes?

[Unregistered]

And the problem is?

Willfull ignorance.

[Unregistered]

Hahaha. The problem is it is quite likely that Russia and North Korea are both colluding against the USA.

Do you think it's at all possible that Russia helped NK with radioactive matter, missile technology, etc.?

You remember the Cold War, Korean War, yes?

Of course Russia and NK worked together on nuclear materials. Still not relevant to the point of what Trump said regarding no speed limit no time limit. Yes he would prefer faster but you're forgetting one major point. The sanctions are still in place, while sanctions normally don't work they were tough enough to get NK to the table and stop them from further testing. A perfectly fine negotiation tactic is to signal and say sure take all the time you want. In other words the sanctions are not hurting us, they are hurting you. The longer NK takes they longer they feel the pain.

[Unregistered]

Art of the deal, lol....

Even before he sat down in the Oval Office, Trump claimed that he had been on the phone with Boeing and chopped down that big number. It was a claim he repeated several times in his first few months in office—his go-to example of his negotiating skills.

Trump: We've got that price down by over $1 billion and I probably haven't spoken for more than an hour on the project,

However, within a few weeks, the White House website had chopped Trump savings from “over a billion” to “millions.” And now, Donald Trump has completed his negotiations, coming up with a new price of … $3.9 billion. That’s right. After two years of negotiation, Donald Trump’s price is a billion dollars higher than where he started. No wonder everyone loves to negotiate with Trump.

According to USA Today, Trump is claiming that the new contract saved either “$1.5 billion” or “$1.4 billion” over the original contract. Except it doesn’t. The original contract was actually the $2.87 billion figure. The $3.73 billion was a projected cost running forward to 2026 and anticipating inflation and cost overruns. Trump has now reset the base value to $3.9 billion. Nowhere did anyone project any kind of number that would make Trump’s $3.9 billion a “savings.”

Trump has actually raised the cost of this project by over $1 billion.

[Unregistered]

Of course Russia and NK worked together on nuclear materials. Still not relevant to the point of what Trump said regarding no speed limit no time limit. Yes he would prefer faster but you're forgetting one major point. The sanctions are still in place, while sanctions normally don't work they were tough enough to get NK to the table and stop them from further testing. A perfectly fine negotiation tactic is to signal and say sure take all the time you want. In other words the sanctions are not hurting us, they are hurting you. The longer NK takes they longer they feel the pain.

Oh thanks, but I'm okay with the time limit/speed limit. They can take their time, sure.

I find this part ludicrous:

"Trump said he discussed North Korea with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday at their summit in Helsinki. "President Putin is going to be involved in the sense that he is with us," Trump said."

Putin is NOT with us, okay? He's against us.

Everyday Is opposite day in trumpland .