But, her EMAILS! Benghazi!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Merry Christmas from Donald Trump
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo. Actually, moderates dominate the Dems. Wanting healthcare is actually a moderate position. So is wanting good schools. So is wanting a fair justice system. So is wanting equality for women and minorities. None of that is radical.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYes I agree but the moderate, more popular messaging gets lost in more extreme ideas and anti-Trump rhetoric. It's why so many liked Berniemail - simple message of a few key ideas. There is complete disorganization in the DNC. They're killing themselves
But, I agree: the DNC is really incapable of honing a coherent message that gets voters out. IF the Dems pick up any seats this November, it will be as a result of things the Republicans did that voters didn't like and not anything the Democrats did that was positive.
It doesn't help the Dems that the Republicans are successfully dumbing down the electorate and, in a lot of cases, have those idiots voting against their own interests.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMaria Butina, arrested yesterday by the FBI for being a spy, is one of two Russian nationals who are lifetime members of the @NRA. The other is Alexander Torshin, whom the Spanish have accused of money-laundering for the Russian mafia.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSend in Saul Berenson and Carrie, they will get the truth
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLibs admired Castro.
Fidel Castro jailed and tortured political prisoners at a higher rate than Stalin during the Great Terror. He murdered more Cubans in his first three years in power than Hitler murdered Germans during his first six.
Fidel Castro shattered — through mass-executions, mass-jailings, mass larceny and exile — virtually every family on the island of Cuba. Many opponents of the Castro regime qualify as the longest-suffering political prisoners in modern history, having suffered prison camps, forced labor and torture chambers for a period three times as long in Fidel Castro’s Gulag as Alexander Solzhenitsyn suffered in Stalin’s Gulag.
Fidel Castro also came closest of anyone in history to (wantonly) starting a worldwide nuclear war.
In the above process Fidel Castro converted a highly-civilized nation with a higher standard of living than much of Europe and swamped with immigrants into a slum/sewer ravaged by tropical diseases and with the highest suicide rate in the Western hemisphere.
Over TWENTY TIMES as many people (and counting) have died trying to escape Castro’s Cuba as died trying to escape East Germany. Yet prior to Castroism Cuba received more immigrants per-capita than almost any nation on earth—more than the U.S. did including the Ellis Island years, in fact.
Fidel Castro helped train and fund practically every terror group on earth, from the Weathermen to Puerto Rico’s Macheteros, from Argentina’s Montoneros, to Colombia’s FARC, from the Black Panthers to the IRA and from the PLO to AL Fatah.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLibs are always in denial. Why not take a page from Castro's book and send me to prison ?
You just can't stand it when called out on the hypocrisy. Can't stand it.
Do you believe the entire U.S. Intelligence services, and the statement put out by the National Director of Intelligence today, over his signature regarding the scope and depth of political espionage going on by the Russians in 2016 and beyond, or do you believe the President from his two hour meeting with Putin?
Can you answer this simple question?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo, we are talking about the constant attacks on the President for his comments about the media . The fact that you can't connect the dots is your problem. Liberals have selected memory time after time.
You have swallowed the line from the MSM regarding Russia, cheered on by Dems . They aren't going to attack or nuke us. They are smarter than that.
Where did you come up with that?
Did they not state instead about the scope and depth of the Russian political espionage? What about that Russian agent arrested yesterday for infiltrating our political organizations? Do you think she just did that on her own?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post10 million illegals are okay. Two dozen Russian keyboard heroes that were UNSUCCESFUL changing, altering, or disallowing any votes is an " attack " . Keep watching CNN>
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBags of cash delivered to a Rome hotel for favored Italian candidates. Scandalous stories leaked to foreign newspapers to swing an election in Nicaragua. Millions of pamphlets, posters and stickers printed to defeat an incumbent in Serbia.
The long arm of Vladimir Putin? No, just a small sample of the United States’ history of intervention in foreign elections.
On Tuesday, American intelligence chiefs warned the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russia appears to be preparing to repeat in the 2018 midterm elections the same full-on chicanery it unleashed in 2016: hacking, leaking, social media manipulation and possibly more. Then on Friday, Robert Mueller, the special counsel, announced the indictments of 13 Russians and three companies, run by a businessman with close Kremlin ties, laying out in astonishing detail a three-year scheme to use social media to attack Hillary Clinton, boost Donald Trump and sow discord.
Most Americans are understandably shocked by what they view as an unprecedented attack on our political system. But intelligence veterans, and scholars who have studied covert operations, have a different, and quite revealing, view.
“If you ask an intelligence officer, did the Russians break the rules or do something bizarre, the answer is no, not at all,” said Steven L. Hall, who retired in 2015 after 30 years at the C.I.A., where he was the chief of Russian operations. The United States “absolutely” has carried out such election influence operations historically, he said, “and I hope we keep doing it.”
Loch K. Johnson, the dean of American intelligence scholars, who began his career in the 1970s investigating the C.I.A. as a staff member of the Senate’s Church Committee, says Russia’s 2016 operation was simply the cyber-age version of standard United States practice for decades, whenever American officials were worried about a foreign vote.
“We’ve been doing this kind of thing since the C.I.A. was created in 1947,” said Mr. Johnson, now at the University of Georgia. “We’ve used posters, pamphlets, mailers, banners — you name it. We’ve planted false information in foreign newspapers. We’ve used what the British call ‘King George’s cavalry’: suitcases of cash.”
The United States’ departure from democratic ideals sometimes went much further. The C.I.A. helped overthrow elected leaders in Iran and Guatemala in the 1950s and backed violent coups in several other countries in the 1960s. It plotted assassinations and supported brutal anti-Communist governments in Latin America, Africa and Asia.
But in recent decades, both Mr. Hall and Mr. Johnson argued, Russian and American interferences in elections have not been morally equivalent. American interventions have generally been aimed at helping non-authoritarian candidates challenge dictators or otherwise promoting democracy. Russia has more often intervened to disrupt democracy or promote authoritarian rule, they said.
Are we a government with dirty hands? If so, do we use the disturbing behavior of our own government to defend another government doing the same to us? Shouldn't your outcry be against all forms of this behavior? Why do you insist on ignoring what your own intelligence services are telling you?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAre we a government with dirty hands? If so, do we use the disturbing behavior of our own government to defend another government doing the same to us? Shouldn't your outcry be against all forms of this behavior? Why do you insist on ignoring what your own intelligence services are telling you?
one is spying- they both know they do it and they both know its going on- and spying by its definition is underhanded, every country does it- BTW its not a secret
libs wanted Trump to go tell Vlad he interfered with our election- everybody knows he did and he doesnt care that we know- did you expect him to say sorry?I wont do it anymore? he was a former KGB agent he knows what our CIA has done he knows what his guys can do and he fully expects them to keep doing it , even more so now that he knows the libs are freaking out about it
he doesnt even have to actually do it - libs have so overreacted that everything is now suspect
he didnt dominate Trump he dominated the media and he fully expects them to do what they do best lately divide the country for him
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postyou just dont get it- when these 2 guys walk into the same room there are certain absolutes that they dont need to talk about- in fact dont talk about- spying on each other is just one of them
one is spying- they both know they do it and they both know its going on- and spying by its definition is underhanded, every country does it- BTW its not a secret
libs wanted Trump to go tell Vlad he interfered with our election- everybody knows he did and he doesnt care that we know- did you expect him to say sorry?I wont do it anymore? he was a former KGB agent he knows what our CIA has done he knows what his guys can do and he fully expects them to keep doing it , even more so now that he knows the libs are freaking out about it
he doesnt even have to actually do it - libs have so overreacted that everything is now suspect
he didnt dominate Trump he dominated the media and he fully expects them to do what they do best lately divide the country for him
- Quote
Comment
Comment