Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Merry Christmas from Donald Trump
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTRUMP did not work in the white house prior to 2016...so why should he?
In any event, if the IRS has them anyway, why can't your liberal slave masters get them (should not be that hard) and post them in the daily news? I see alot of smoke being created to keep your eye off the ball on how badly your masters are selling us out so they can have more for themselves.
a deaf blind and dumb sheep is all you will ever be
Why do you have a problem with Hunter selling paintings while not working for the government but you have no problem with Javanka making over $640 million in their private businesses while working at the White House?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTRUMP did not work in the white house prior to 2016...so why should he?
In any event, if the IRS has them anyway, why can't your liberal slave masters get them (should not be that hard) and post them in the daily news? I see alot of smoke being created to keep your eye off the ball on how badly your masters are selling us out so they can have more for themselves.
a deaf blind and dumb sheep is all you will ever be
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Trump trying to block his Taxs again, scvvvvbag has so much to hide I can’t wait till his shiiiiit comes public and right in time with the Midterms 👍
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTrump trying to block his Taxs again, scvvvvbag has so much to hide I can’t wait till his shiiiiit comes public and right in time with the Midterms 👍
"President Trump went to the Supreme Court asking the justices to protect him from subpoenas for his financial records—subpoenas from congressional committees and subpoenas from a New York state grand jury. He didn’t get the shield against accountability that he sought. In the New York case, he lost decisively. In his higher-profile battle with Congress, the court sought a middle ground, and it found one on a broad 7-to-2 vote.
Who precisely gets to claim this middle ground as victory remains to be seen. The court was by no means heedless of President Trump’s expressed concerns about congressional harassment of a president. Indeed, the justices showed a notable sensitivity to the separation of powers issues that might arise when Congress seeks personal papers from a president. But the court also rejected key presidential arguments, and it left a lot of room for Congress to prevail in litigation that will now follow. The court here attempted a solomonic effort to split a baby—leaving it to later litigation to determine whether the executive branch or the legislature got the bigger half.
In the end, Trump has probably succeeded in his short-term effort to keep his financial records from Congress through the November election. But if his goal was to prevent the judiciary from enforcing congressional subpoenas affecting him, he has likely failed. And if his goal was a longer-term effort to denude Congress of the power to investigate the president, he has likely failed at that too."
https://www.lawfareblog.com/supreme-...subpoena-cases
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI'll ask for a third time:
Why do you have a problem with Hunter selling paintings while not working for the government but you have no problem with Javanka making over $640 million in their private businesses while working at the White House?
But oh yea, those paintings!!!!!!!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDo you not remember the Whitewater invesitigation that republicans ran against the Clintons? Those allegations dated to 1978. Why did that have to be investigated if it didn't happen while Clinton was in the White House? Same with Paul Jones. Why did republicans spend all of our tax dollars only to never find any wrongdoing by the Clintons? The conduct occurred way before Clinton's election. Why did it matter?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Posthe was a governor, the investigation started in Arkansas
That ^^^ is a dodge that won’t work. Clinton was impeached for lying when questioned under oath during a Federal investigation about matters that occurred prior to, and therefore unrelated to his role as POTUS.
By the way investigations into Trump were underway in NY long before Trump was POTUS, so that part of your argument falls too.
Can’t have it both ways but you overprivileged cons cannot seem to get that .
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHe'll never answer that question, or the questions surrounding Trump profiting while in office - and still profiting by having GOP fundraisers and other events at his properties and charging higher than market rates. Or the $140M spent on golf weekends where staff and security had to stay at his properties. Or all the times the kids grifted their way onto international trips on our dime. Or when Trump used international trips to promote his properties.
But oh yea, those paintings!!!!!!!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI'll ask for a third time:
Why do you have a problem with Hunter selling paintings while not working for the government but you have no problem with Javanka making over $640 million in their private businesses while working at the White House?
when did hunter become a painter? how many paintings has he sold in his lifetime?
i am not an art critic so i wont comment on their value . there is ample proof that he benefits from his fathers office and accusations that a portions of those benefits get kicked up to Joe
( these days accusations seem to be all you need, this topic has more than that,in my opinion enough to at least look into it,which has not been done)
so the Hunter paintings- have issues with who is buying them and why- which is no different than asking who stayed at the trump hotel in DC and why
have you seen the art? will you be bidding on it?
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
the Trump kids had the businesses BEFORE they went to the white house- those businesses were viable before daddy became a politician- therefore they have a track record
when did hunter become a painter? how many paintings has he sold in his lifetime?
i am not an art critic so i wont comment on their value . there is ample proof that he benefits from his fathers office and accusations that a portions of those benefits get kicked up to Joe
( these days accusations seem to be all you need, this topic has more than that,in my opinion enough to at least look into it,which has not been done)
so the Hunter paintings- have issues with who is buying them and why- which is no different than asking who stayed at the trump hotel in DC and why
have you seen the art? will you be bidding on it?
I seem to recall Donnie turned on Qatar, had it bolckaded and then Qatar bailed out Jared. Do you recall that?
Qatar Shocked, Shocked to Learn It Accidentally Bailed Out Jared Kushner | Vanity Fair
The Pitiful Endgame of Saudi Arabia and Trump's Qatar Blockade (foreignpolicy.com)
Now I'm sure you will all tell us that nothing untoward happened there. Of course you will. While telling us that Jared was a businessman before the White House so what's the big deal if he benefits from his position in the White House? Who cares that it obviously impacted our foreign policy? Hunter Biden doesn't know how to paint and it's so so unfair that he should profit just because his father is president. That's what you cry about. To you it's ok to profit off or your role in one of the highest positions in the government as long as you were a businessman before. And it actually makes sense to you.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
So just because Javanka was in business before excuses them running private businesses while working at the White House? They used their positions in the government for their own financial gain. Jared got loans from Qatar to save his building. Ivanka got 41 patents approved in record time even though before she was in the White House she could not get those patents, no nearly in the time she got them. Those are just a couple of examples of them using their positions to enrich themselves to the tune of millions upon millions of dollars. Their actions could and did impact foreign policy. Who is Hunter hurting by selling those paintings?
I seem to recall Donnie turned on Qatar, had it bolckaded and then Qatar bailed out Jared. Do you recall that?
Qatar Shocked, Shocked to Learn It Accidentally Bailed Out Jared Kushner | Vanity Fair
The Pitiful Endgame of Saudi Arabia and Trump's Qatar Blockade (foreignpolicy.com)
Now I'm sure you will all tell us that nothing untoward happened there. Of course you will. While telling us that Jared was a businessman before the White House so what's the big deal if he benefits from his position in the White House? Who cares that it obviously impacted our foreign policy? Hunter Biden doesn't know how to paint and it's so so unfair that he should profit just because his father is president. That's what you cry about. To you it's ok to profit off or your role in one of the highest positions in the government as long as you were a businessman before. And it actually makes sense to you.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
you ignorant libs don't get that the Trump's profited and it was in the eye of the public and as you stated was shown on their tax returns...whether it influenced anything politically can only be speculated...you cannot truthfully be verified or denied no matter which side you are on...I fall in the middle where I wait to see if any party is criminally indicted for their actions...Hunter, on the other hand, does everything in the shroud of secrecy...why is it that no one can know who bought his paintings at such exorbitant prices? bring everything out in the open and those questions disappear...the transparency of the transactions is the difference between the situations
Biden's sales are no secret. They have been highly adverised.
Neither Hunter, any of the Bidens or anyone else can know the name of the buyer. That's so that cultists like you don't make the accusations you're now making -- that is, if the Biden's don't even know who bought it, how can the purchase influence anything. I know, you'll tell me that it's only logical that the Bidens would find out. And yet it's not logical to you that Jared profited and got hundreds of millions from Qatar simply because Trump was president.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Boy you're an idiot. "whether it influenced anything politically can only be speculated." you say. That's the whole point. They should never be in a position where their business interests impact our foreign policy. As you acknowledge, it may very well be the case that this occurred. The evidence itself is quite damning. Qatar wouldn't play ball with Jared so Trump supported a blockade of our ally. After Qatar gave Jared hunfreds of millions, everything was fixed for Qatar.
Biden's sales are no secret. They have been highly adverised.
Neither Hunter, any of the Bidens or anyone else can know the name of the buyer. That's so that cultists like you don't make the accusations you're now making -- that is, if the Biden's don't even know who bought it, how can the purchase influence anything. I know, you'll tell me that it's only logical that the Bidens would find out. And yet it's not logical to you that Jared profited and got hundreds of millions from Qatar simply because Trump was president.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
yea sure they don't know the names of the buyer (coughing)....
You cons are such freaking geniuses. You know it all when it comes to Hunter but about Qatar you say "whether it influenced anything politically can only be speculated." There should be no speculation whatsoever. We all know what happened. There's no speculation. You're speculating that the Bidens will find out the identiy of the buyer.
- Quote
Comment
Comment