Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

[Unregistered]

"i am willing to bet they dont call either of them"......free money Degenerate free money.

They will be called and the later this drags on the better so Willy Wonker McCarthy don't get the Chocolate factory he so desperately wants.

The only reason why Humpty Dumpty wasn't officially impeached in the Senate is because those Degenerate puzzy cats dont have the ballzzz.

Here's is another interview after the damaging Bret Baier one with which a stong biased conservative named Taylor Popielarz asked him again.



Popielarz asked Jordan to clear some confusion on the matter, asking the Ohio Republican, “First off, yes or no — did you speak with President Trump on Jan. 6?”


“Yeah I mean — I spoke with the president last week, I speak with the president all of the time. I spoke with him on Jan. 6. I mean, I talked with President Trump all the time and that's ... I don't think that's unusual. I would expect members of Congress to talk with the president of the United States when they're trying to get done the things they told the voters in their district to do,” Jordan said.

“On Jan. 6, did you speak with him before, during, or after the Capitol was attacked?” Popielarz pressed Jordan.

“I spoke with him that day, after? I think after. I don't know if I spoke with him in the morning or not. I just don't know ... I don't know when those conversations happened,” Jordan replied.

Whatta scuuuumbag!!! i wouldn't put Bin Laden on the 911 commission so why put Jordon on the insurrection COMMITTEE.

You Degenerates are having a real hard time figuring this out.

your false equivalencies are astounding...did you come up with that in your own pea brain or are you just repeating what you heard from madcow? lmao

[Unregistered]

your false equivalencies are astounding...did you come up with that in your own pea brain or are you just repeating what you heard from madcow? lmao

Got the Transcript from Foxnews.com.


Should I believe them?

[Unregistered]

Got the Transcript from Foxnews.com.


Should I believe them?

you will believe anything said by anybody as long as you think it is bad for Trump in your mind
and you have for at least the last 41/2 years- how has that worked out for you?

BTW you totally missed the OPs point- strike

[Unregistered]

Mitch killed the commission in TOTALITY. So Mitch killed EVERY potential member of that proposed commission.

That’s the very reason why we now have a HOUSE commission you stupid dumbass. Do you see ANY Senators of either party involved. Of course not. Mitch KILLED that, establishing the GQP agenda of torpedoing hearings however they can.

Nancy rejected TWO of the five or six choices McCarthy made. Jordon, being a FACT witness based on his admission that he talked to Trump during the riot, clearly shouldn’t serve. Not sure about the other. McCarthy pulled the others, so he KILLED his own members.

^^^ factually 100% correct

One day later , the FACTS remain unchallenged!

[Unregistered]

One day later , the FACTS remain unchallenged!

correct
nancy broke the deal and the other side walked

100% factual

[Unregistered]

correct
nancy broke the deal and the other side walked

100% factual

100% factual that she had every right to do that, not that she broke a "deal". The Benghazzi rules used by Nancy provide that republicans recommend members and she gets to approve or not approve them. Those are the rules you cons conceived in Benghazzi. So Nancy exercised the rights that republicans so nicely established for her. That's 100% factual.

Also 100% factual is that you failed to address the balance of the post, meaning that you can't even bring yourself to admit that killed the bipartisan commission that house republicans agreed to. This is what you conveniently left out:

Mitch killed the commission in TOTALITY. So Mitch killed EVERY potential member of that proposed commission.

That’s the very reason why we now have a HOUSE commission you stupid dumbass. Do you see ANY Senators of either party involved. Of course not. Mitch KILLED that, establishing the GQP agenda of torpedoing hearings however they can.

[Unregistered]

correct
nancy broke the deal and the other side walked

100% factual

Pray tell us….what was the “deal” she walked away from? Show us that she ever promised to seat McCarthy’s choices without exercising her lawful veto power.

Cons probably shouldn’t have walked away from the bipartisan commission Katko negotiated with McCarthy’s blessing ….

But Kevin was never the sharpest stick….

Make me a sammich, Kevin-O!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-entrepreneur/

[Unregistered]

100% factual that she had every right to do that, not that she broke a "deal". The Benghazzi rules used by Nancy provide that republicans recommend members and she gets to approve or not approve them. Those are the rules you cons conceived in Benghazzi. So Nancy exercised the rights that republicans so nicely established for her. That's 100% factual.

Also 100% factual is that you failed to address the balance of the post, meaning that you can't even bring yourself to admit that killed the bipartisan commission that house republicans agreed to. This is what you conveniently left out:

Mitch killed the commission in TOTALITY. So Mitch killed EVERY potential member of that proposed commission.

That’s the very reason why we now have a HOUSE commission you stupid dumbass. Do you see ANY Senators of either party involved. Of course not. Mitch KILLED that, establishing the GQP agenda of torpedoing hearings however they can.

^^^^ 💯

What’s the matter cons? “Benghazi” rules are no longer ok with you, ❄️’s?

Whelp!

[Unregistered]

^^^^ 💯

What’s the matter cons? “Benghazi” rules are no longer ok with you, ❄️’s?

Whelp!

Let's put some of those GQP congressional members on the stand for 11 hours like Clinton was, see how they fare. We know Donald would lie within the first two minutes. How many years did they investigate Benghazi, four I think? Meanwhile the GOP didn't do any legislating like that annually promised "great healthcare" or infrastructure or immigration or... But, hey those tax cuts for the rich worked out well for their big donors.

[Unregistered]

Got the Transcript from Foxnews.com.


Should I believe them?

thanks for proving my point lmao...only someone with your intellect wouldn't realize that quotes do not constitute an equivalence...too funny...too funny

[Unregistered]

One day later , the FACTS remain unchallenged!

the fact remains that by doing this nance looks like the villain and it will play nicely in the midterms lmao...denying a formal naval officer...brilliant

[Unregistered]

the fact remains that by doing this nance looks like the villain and it will play nicely in the midterms lmao...denying a formal naval officer...brilliant

Fact is that she would look like a villain to the Trump stooges no matter what she did. She would have been off her rocker if she allowed Trump stooges to get on the commission so that they could disrupt it at every turn, like they did with the impeachment hearings.

You cons are claiming that she broke some "deal" when there is no deal. Most of you cons wouldn't even believe us if we told you that the rules allow her to do precisely what she did and that those rules were established by republicans. Truth and facts just don't matter.

So yeah, you cons who believe that Trump won the election will cry to no end about that bipartisan commission that's investigating January 6th no matter who it's composed of. It's just that you don't have your clowns on that commission to disrupt it.

You could have had that commission 50/50 repblican/democrat but Mitch killed it. So now you cry like the whiney and cultified little snowflakes that you are.

[Unregistered]

Fact is that she would look like a villain to the Trump stooges no matter what she did. She would have been off her rocker if she allowed Trump stooges to get on the commission so that they could disrupt it at every turn, like they did with the impeachment hearings.

You cons are claiming that she broke some "deal" when there is no deal. Most of you cons wouldn't even believe us if we told you that the rules allow her to do precisely what she did and that those rules were established by republicans. Truth and facts just don't matter.

So yeah, you cons who believe that Trump won the election will cry to no end about that bipartisan commission that's investigating January 6th no matter who it's composed of. It's just that you don't have your clowns on that commission to disrupt it.

You could have had that commission 50/50 repblican/democrat but Mitch killed it. So now you cry like the whiney and cultified little snowflakes that you are.

^^^thinks he knows how a conservative thinks lmao...delusional

[Unregistered]

^^^thinks he knows how a conservative thinks lmao...delusional

Different poster.

It’s easy to do so. The sound of scraping knuckles when a con goes by starts the process. It’s easy from there on out.

Thanks for playing.

[Unregistered]

the fact remains that by doing this nance looks like the villain and it will play nicely in the midterms lmao...denying a formal naval officer...brilliant

Is this what you tell yourself? That it’s fine to lie about it so long as the optics favor the home team? Is that what you are fessing up to?

There should be show about stuff like this ….”Cons say the stupidest things”

What a laugh riot you are