Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Merry Christmas from Donald Trump
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostClear him of obstruction? That wasn't the intent of the Investigation. The intent of the Investigation was the alleged Russian Meddling and any participation of Trump and his associates. None was found.
Therefore, volume 2 is presented, beyond the scope of what a Prosecutor is charged to do.
He was unable to find any reason to opine that obstruction had taken place, so as his place as a Prosecutor is to find reason to prosecute or not , he did not. Cut and dry. Indict or don't indict. The political posturing( because that is all it is ) regarding anything else goes out the door. It is irrelevant . For many reasons. The principal one being if there wasn't any conduct that would lead to criminal culpability, there can be no charges to obstruct. Telling people to do things that they don't do is not obstruction. He is the President. He is an elected Official directing employees . If those employees commit a crime, then they can point the finger. No crimes ? Nothing there. Second, his ability to make decisions and give orders is quite clear as President. Others may not agree, but he is the President. If those others think he has gone outside of his powers, they have due process to go through.
Go ahead, question anyone and everyone, if they bother to show up. Ask Eric Holder how that works. It will go nowhere. Dems are desperate. Collusion blew up in their face, and now they are trying to sell Impeachment based on obstructing a crime that was alleged, but never proven. And the real shame is that Dems won't give it up to concentrate on all the real problems to solve. This hysterical nonsense has done nothing to improve or help the lives of Americans.
And I am telling you to review the Federalist papers on Impeachment. There is nothing here that is Impeachable. Nothing. Nancy knows it. She is just stalling, telling them all to keep digging. You had a Fresh Dem in the House yelling " impeach the M..f..er" before any Report was even issued. That's great isn't it? An elected Official , without any evidence, keeping the negative rhetoric flowing. That's the new Democratic Leadership being ushered in. The heck with due process, we're here now.
Each and every Day , the Dems are showing the level of their pathetic derangement with their inability to accept anyone that offers contrary opinions or ideology, and when losing, go nearly ballistic and haywire like spoiled 2 year olds.
Thanks for you explications about the Federalist Papers. I'm sure those Federalist Papers say impeachment is appropriate if you lie under oath during a Republican Witch Hunt about getting a blow job from an intern. Please direct me to that portion of the Federalist Papers. Much obliged.
Finally, your spin on his conclusion about the reason Mueller didn't charge Trump with obstruction is belied by the text of the report itself. But no matter. The Repubs will get to question Mueller for themselves. Can't wait to see them turn their venom on him, the patriots that they are who protect Admiral Bone Spurs come hell or high water. I will be thinking of you during the cross examinations of all of the lovely witnesses that will be called shortly so that the Repubs can cross examine them as you wish. Will be awesome.
It would have been more awesome if Trump had the cojones to answer Mueller's questions under oath as did Clinton. But the pathetic president that he is, he didn't have the guts to do so and now claims that those who did were the ones fabricating. And you Repubs think it's just fine. I mean, don't want him to walk into a perjury trap now, do we? LOL!!!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSeriously? The guy testified for 30 hours to Mueller. What do you think those dopes in Congress, the same ones who were taken to the woodshed by Candace Owens, could possibly ask that hasn't already been asked? This is all for political show. Nothing more.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo. It is for public consumption. So that people like you don't go on for eternity claiming that he lied and Trump was railroaded. We have a democracy you know. The public has a right to know so as to help them make an informed decision at the voting booths. If McGahn was lying we have the right to know that too. You know, the cross-examination you've been crying about. I hope he testifies for another 30 hours to give you Repubs the opportunity to ask all the questions your little hearts desire. I'm not afraid of that testimony. The smear campaign against him underway by Trump and his cohorts shows that they are afraid. Very afraid. As are you.
White House Councils are never allowed to be interviewed and yet Trump allowed it -maybe there is nothing to hide
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAre you kidding me with this garbage? First, his charge was broader than you say. Second, remember Whitewater? Monica Lewinsky? Enough said.
Thanks for you explications about the Federalist Papers. I'm sure those Federalist Papers say impeachment is appropriate if you lie under oath during a Republican Witch Hunt about getting a blow job from an intern. Please direct me to that portion of the Federalist Papers. Much obliged.
Finally, your spin on his conclusion about the reason Mueller didn't charge Trump with obstruction is belied by the text of the report itself. But no matter. The Repubs will get to question Mueller for themselves. Can't wait to see them turn their venom on him, the patriots that they are who protect Admiral Bone Spurs come hell or high water. I will be thinking of you during the cross examinations of all of the lovely witnesses that will be called shortly so that the Repubs can cross examine them as you wish. Will be awesome.
It would have been more awesome if Trump had the cojones to answer Mueller's questions under oath as did Clinton. But the pathetic president that he is, he didn't have the guts to do so and now claims that those who did were the ones fabricating. And you Repubs think it's just fine. I mean, don't want him to walk into a perjury trap now, do we? LOL!!!
trump was smarter than that
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postyou do know that Trump could have claimed privilege as Obama did with Holder (fast and Furious)- and you wouldnt have any McGahn testimony at all.
White House Councils are never allowed to be interviewed and yet Trump allowed it -maybe there is nothing to hide
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHolder was attorney general. McGahn is White House Counsel. You know, like Dean was when he testified against Nixon. There is no executive privilege when the shielding conduct that is criminal. Just like there is no attorney-client privilege to shield criminal conduct. As Mueller concluded, Trump's conduct may indeed be criminal and he could very well be indicted once out of office. It may be the case that Trump's lawyers determined that there was no basis to assert executive privilege. They are the ones who advised Trump not to assert the privilege and let McGahn testify. Having so done, he has now waived whatever privilege he could have asserted. Looking forward to that testimony.
So let's see now. Trump afraid to testify under oath. Trump afraid to release his personal financial information. Trump afraid to have others testify and allow his Republican defenders to really prove that McGahn is a liar. Trump not responding to any congressional subpoenas. Yeah, he has nothing to hide and everyone but him is a liar.
As I said before, one day you will wake up and look back on this period asking yourself how could I have been such a fool? How could I have defended this lawless president? How could I have rationalized all of this? All the while telling everyone else how blind they were.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOops. Spoke to soon. The cowards will try to prevent McGahn and others from testifying in front of the American people. Let's hear from you Trumpkins. Defend the indefensible.
So let's see now. Trump afraid to testify under oath. Trump afraid to release his personal financial information. Trump afraid to have others testify and allow his Republican defenders to really prove that McGahn is a liar. Trump not responding to any congressional subpoenas. Yeah, he has nothing to hide and everyone but him is a liar.
As I said before, one day you will wake up and look back on this period asking yourself how could I have been such a fool? How could I have defended this lawless president? How could I have rationalized all of this? All the while telling everyone else how blind they were.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOops. Spoke to soon. The cowards will try to prevent McGahn and others from testifying in front of the American people. Let's hear from you Trumpkins. Defend the indefensible.
So let's see now. Trump afraid to testify under oath. Trump afraid to release his personal financial information. Trump afraid to have others testify and allow his Republican defenders to really prove that McGahn is a liar. Trump not responding to any congressional subpoenas. Yeah, he has nothing to hide and everyone but him is a liar.
As I said before, one day you will wake up and look back on this period asking yourself how could I have been such a fool? How could I have defended this lawless president? How could I have rationalized all of this? All the while telling everyone else how blind they were.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHolder was attorney general. McGahn is White House Counsel. You know, like Dean was when he testified against Nixon. There is no executive privilege when the shielding conduct that is criminal. Just like there is no attorney-client privilege to shield criminal conduct. As Mueller concluded, Trump's conduct may indeed be criminal and he could very well be indicted once out of office. It may be the case that Trump's lawyers determined that there was no basis to assert executive privilege. They are the ones who advised Trump not to assert the privilege and let McGahn testify. Having so done, he has now waived whatever privilege he could have asserted. Looking forward to that testimony.
your investigation ended in a whimper
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered123
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo. It is for public consumption. So that people like you don't go on for eternity claiming that he lied and Trump was railroaded. We have a democracy you know. The public has a right to know so as to help them make an informed decision at the voting booths. If McGahn was lying we have the right to know that too. You know, the cross-examination you've been crying about. I hope he testifies for another 30 hours to give you Repubs the opportunity to ask all the questions your little hearts desire. I'm not afraid of that testimony. The smear campaign against him underway by Trump and his cohorts shows that they are afraid. Very afraid. As are you.
Public consumption, my ass. What the Dems are doing is campaigning for the upcoming 2020 election.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo. It is for public consumption. So that people like you don't go on for eternity claiming that he lied and Trump was railroaded. We have a democracy you know. The public has a right to know so as to help them make an informed decision at the voting booths. If McGahn was lying we have the right to know that too. You know, the cross-examination you've been crying about. I hope he testifies for another 30 hours to give you Repubs the opportunity to ask all the questions your little hearts desire. I'm not afraid of that testimony. The smear campaign against him underway by Trump and his cohorts shows that they are afraid. Very afraid. As are you.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCome on Snowflake. Trump and I want the Dems to keep this Russia thing going as long as possible. I would prefer McGahn testify right around next spring in the heart of the 2020 campaign. Trump is timing this and playing you guys like a virtuoso.
https://nypost.com/2019/04/24/video-...mexico-border/
- Quote
Comment
Comment