Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oakwood
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostClubs? Boys, girls? Ages? Needs to be done by team for age and gender. This is absurd. CFCU sucks on the boys side (all of their branches suck), FSA sucks on the girls side, Oakwood decent in both (but not top), BS ..... Yikes!, Rush varies by team, AC CT by team also varies, CP (part of CFC or not) .....
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostClubs? Boys, girls? Ages? Needs to be done by team for age and gender. This is absurd. CFCU sucks on the boys side (all of their branches suck), FSA sucks on the girls side, Oakwood decent in both (but not top), BS ..... Yikes!, Rush varies by team, AC CT by team also varies, CP (part of CFC or not) .....
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostJust goes to show the OP doesn’t have a clue about soccer. Your post nails it.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAll the question did was show for the billionth time that US Youth soccer is hopelessly broken in so many different ways it has become unfixable. If I had a ULittle that excelled in 2021 in CT, my head would explode with all the options, all the marketing, all the bs. I can't imagine what it's like to have a boy and a girl who both excel looking for clubs. LOL.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postso what you're saying is that the #2 club in CT is participating in the "weak" OPI tournament. Seems to contradict the other statement that it's all weak teams. Or, CFC North just isn't that good, which may be the case.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Arsenal is better than North. Just look at how many players Arsenal feeds the United program compared to North. But both branches are only good at u-little.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
08 North team fielded just as many players to United for U14 next year. even took their goalie
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
North is still good u14 and up. Arsenal falls off after they send players to United. But north remains competitive and in a solid league. I would even argue that if your D doesn't make the 1 team and is offered ecnl 2, just stay at north. North also places girls into college.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNorth is still good u14 and up. Arsenal falls off after they send players to United. But north remains competitive and in a solid league. I would even argue that if your D doesn't make the 1 team and is offered ecnl 2, just stay at north. North also places girls into college.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
North
Let’s be real. North may be the best branch after United forms but even their regional team isn’t good in EDP. They are very mediocre. And the rest of the branches are awful in hs ages. Arsenal Barry has teams most years
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
if the best players in CT all go to United then I would expect the CFC branches to be weaker. they all compete for tier 2 players with the likes of Gina, FUSA, etc how much soccer talent is really out there in CT?
- Quote
Comment
Comment