Originally posted by Guest
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oakwood
Collapse
X
-
Guest
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
The reason 2013 OW is weak is a large chunk of these players are 2014. This leaves them grasping for low level players to field a second team instead of a strong team of age-appropriate players. Playing up should be a privilege for 1 maybe 2 kids per age group and even then should be contingent on their actual contribution. A top player who is younger is expected be more agile than all players one year older, what else do you bring to the table? If they also don’t ooze soccer IQ, then you don’t belong there. Most of the 2014’s playing at OW 2013 struggle with soccer IQ. Building out of the back and switching fields are foreign concepts driven by luck on each possession. Nowhere close to understanding rotations. Kick and run. Dribble till you fail. That’s what’s happening east of the river.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Pep G couldn't win with some of these teams. Talent is what it is. 3K doesnt buy talent like most parents think it will.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Their other A teams got blown out at 2013 and 2014 levels as well this weekend. It’s all interconnected because they’ve kneeled to a bunch of families of younger players and it’s perpetuated on down for each age group.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
-
Guest
Oakwood has three teams at 2013. Their A team plays in the 1st division of the Northeast Academy league, their B team plays in the 2nd division of the Northeast Academy league. Their C teams play in the Edp.
A team had a 2-2 tie this weekend. Is all this uproar about C teams?!
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
The reason 2013 OW is weak is a large chunk of these players are 2014. This leaves them grasping for low level players to field a second team instead of a strong team of age-appropriate players. Playing up should be a privilege for 1 maybe 2 kids per age group and even then should be contingent on their actual contribution. A top player who is younger is expected be more agile than all players one year older, what else do you bring to the table? If they also don’t ooze soccer IQ, then you don’t belong there. Most of the 2014’s playing at OW 2013 struggle with soccer IQ. Building out of the back and switching fields are foreign concepts driven by luck on each possession. Nowhere close to understanding rotations. Kick and run. Dribble till you fail. That’s what’s happening east of the river.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
Yeah but have you seen Oakwood boys at the 2013 and 2012 level do a Maradona with no pressure? Best in the state!
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I’m sorry your player is on the B team. The reality is most of these kids come from one town and played together for years. They are far superior to the other players. So it’s natural the 1-2 stars from the younger class from the same said town play with them. The others can’t crack the line up.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I’m sorry your player is on the B team. The reality is most of these kids come from one town and played together for years. They are far superior to the other players. So it’s natural the 1-2 stars from the younger class from the same said town play with them. The others can’t crack the line up.
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View PostOakwood has three teams at 2013. Their A team plays in the 1st division of the Northeast Academy league, their B team plays in the 2nd division of the Northeast Academy league. Their C teams play in the Edp.
A team had a 2-2 tie this weekend. Is all this uproar about C teams?!
- Quote
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Guest View Post
I can’t believe I am reading 2013 and 2014. Who cares about that toddler soccer. This site is such a waste of time. Why do I keep thinking something worthwhile will be here.
- Quote
Comment
Comment