Elite Academy

[Guest]

CWS will last a year before they get kicked out of EA for causing too many fist fights.

A little bit of a broad stroke, innit.

[Guest]

Why do we have to lie to our selves lol EA is a joke and if you truly know anything about soccer you'll know that EA and the teams in EA other than CWS, and WE, are all 2nd to 3rd division teams in the RCL. It honestly truthfully is as follows. 1) ECNL, 2) RCL division 1, 3) ECRL, 4) RCL Divsion 2, 5) EA, 6) WPL Super League, 7) Rest of RCL, then 8) rest of WPL. and no im not biased its just the facts sorry to hurt feelings if you don't know then you don't know. Sorry but truth hurts it always does hurts.

[Guest]

Say what you will about the leagues, my son is excited for the second day of WE tryouts. They were very well organized and there were a ton of very skilled players in his age group. Just watching from the parking lot, I do think the team will likely be a bit out of place against some of the EA clubs. Surely Celtic and CWS will be good matchups but there will also be some very lopsided results.

[Guest]

2023/24 NWC EA

WE Surf
Capital Fc
Seattle Celtic
Gunners
MT rainer
Timbers north
Titans

these are all very meh clubs and below average teams. maybe seattle celtic and WE/Surf are more on the good side but the rest are a joke.

I think you are forgetting about the CWS Sounders, who are an excellent team and have also moved to EA.
Seattle Celtic has beaten multiple WA based ECNL teams.
Based on what I've seen so far, I'd put Seattle United ECNL at the top, Crossfire ECNL, and I'm sure there's another really good ECNL team I'd put in 3rd place, but 4th and 5th in the state would go to CWS Sounders and Seattle Celtic.
Not meh.
Seattle Celtic would have been ECNL if it weren't for turf control: ECNL rules dictate that no two clubs can exist in the same territory, thus Seattle United and Seattle Celtic can't both be ECNL. SU set up shop in Seattle first, so they got their territory staked out.

[Guest]

I think you are forgetting about the CWS Sounders, who are an excellent team and have also moved to EA.
Seattle Celtic has beaten multiple WA based ECNL teams.
Based on what I've seen so far, I'd put Seattle United ECNL at the top, Crossfire ECNL, and I'm sure there's another really good ECNL team I'd put in 3rd place, but 4th and 5th in the state would go to CWS Sounders and Seattle Celtic.
Not meh.
Seattle Celtic would have been ECNL if it weren't for turf control: ECNL rules dictate that no two clubs can exist in the same territory, thus Seattle United and Seattle Celtic can't both be ECNL. SU set up shop in Seattle first, so they got their territory staked out.

One of the dumbest posts I've seen in years

[Guest]

I think you are forgetting about the CWS Sounders, who are an excellent team and have also moved to EA.
Seattle Celtic has beaten multiple WA based ECNL teams.
Based on what I've seen so far, I'd put Seattle United ECNL at the top, Crossfire ECNL, and I'm sure there's another really good ECNL team I'd put in 3rd place, but 4th and 5th in the state would go to CWS Sounders and Seattle Celtic.
Not meh.
Seattle Celtic would have been ECNL if it weren't for turf control: ECNL rules dictate that no two clubs can exist in the same territory, thus Seattle United and Seattle Celtic can't both be ECNL. SU set up shop in Seattle first, so they got their territory staked out.

CWS are a good club. On the boys side, I think I may have counted 3 wins in 3 years across all age groups vs ECNL teams.

BTW, Seattle Celtic are one of the oldest clubs in the state- I think they started in 1906? They also have much better access to fields than SU @ Magnuson Park. That has nothing to do with why SU were invited and not Celtic.

shpuld have just stopped at:

"I think you are forgetting about the CWS Sounders, who are an excellent team and have also moved to EA.
Seattle Celtic has beaten multiple WA based ECNL teams."

The rest just demonstrates your stupidity

[Guest]

lol Seattle Celtic is about 20 years old, maybe a bit less. I know a few kids who were on some of the very first teams that were formed, I think most were SU kids who moved over with the coaches who left SU to start Celtic. Perhaps there was something called Seattle Celtic that was founded over a hundred years ago, but I don't think that has any links to the current Celtic organization.

[Guest]

CWS are a good club. On the boys side, I think I may have counted 3 wins in 3 years across all age groups vs ECNL teams.

BTW, Seattle Celtic are one of the oldest clubs in the state- I think they started in 1906? They also have much better access to fields than SU @ Magnuson Park. That has nothing to do with why SU were invited and not Celtic.

shpuld have just stopped at:

"I think you are forgetting about the CWS Sounders, who are an excellent team and have also moved to EA.
Seattle Celtic has beaten multiple WA based ECNL teams."

The rest just demonstrates your stupidity

I'm a CWS parent and to be fair I wont be a hypocrite CWS 08 is the only great team we have along side their younger age teams 9v9 and 7v7. CWS competed as Spokane Sounders ECRL which basically is the RCL Division 1 teams and this is how they finished in each age group 2008-1st, 2007-5th, 2006-6th, 2005/04-8th place so don't come out saying that CWS is that great in all honesty with out being a hater the other team from town sozo 04/05 would beat ours and same with 06 team with out even putting up a fight. we would easily win the 07 and 08 game though but we arent that good of a club we play in the EA because we were not allowed in the ECNL so we tried but we were not let in which is a bummer for our players.