Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
End of GDA
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostVery cynical; I know many coaches in PDX who have coached my kids that this doesn't illustrate. If a kid is a better soccer player then one of my kids then that kid gets to play more and will start over my child. A coach who ok honors this is a good coach. Has nothing to do with humanity nor personal feelings. These are life lessons learned thru sports. If those lessons are difficult for parents to swallow and guide there kids thru then it is the parent that has the issue. My kids have been coached by many of the coaches in PDX and they all cared about my kids.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe entire youth soccer system is corrupt from youth national team selections biases all the way down to local club coaches that private train, promoting their paying private trainees over other deserving players.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostECNL is not innocent in this whole mess either. If their intention was to create an elite league, they should have stayed with their original 40 teams they started with. They started diluting talent and purpose when they started expanding. There is not enough talent to have more than 40 clubs. Period. When they started making decisions based on greed, US Soccer started pushing for more standards.
When it was 40, you had the very best clubs involved but then you expand and the quality suffers, so they wanted assurances that their national team players were in a good environment. Like the previous poster said, the right thing for US Soccer to do was regional residencies for the top 180 girls in the u16-19 age group. 180 players total. But instead they created a league, so now there is 160 clubs, and all the 2nd team players now have access to the “elite” leagues. What a joke.
Had ECNL just stayed with being a 40 team league, and not expanded and watered down the talent to 80 teams, US Soccer would not have intervened. But their ego driven solution was even more disastrous, although, 95% of the top players in the country (national team players) are still in DA, even if the best clubs are leaving. People cheer when good clubs leave DA for ECNL but the reality is, national team players do not switch to ECNL with their club, they find a different DA team to play for.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostVery cynical; I know many coaches in PDX who have coached my kids that this doesn't illustrate. If a kid is a better soccer player then one of my kids then that kid gets to play more and will start over my child. A coach who ok honors this is a good coach. Has nothing to do with humanity nor personal feelings. These are life lessons learned thru sports. If those lessons are difficult for parents to swallow and guide there kids thru then it is the parent that has the issue. My kids have been coached by many of the coaches in PDX and they all cared about my kids.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe entire youth soccer system is corrupt from youth national team selections biases all the way down to local club coaches that private train, promoting their paying private trainees over other deserving players.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThis is pure stupidity. The US is far too big to support that few clubs and would exclude far too many players and teams. ECNL has made mistakes with some teams, by and large the quality of play is far higher than you will find locally with California being the only exception. Additionally, the travel partner concept they have implemented has greatly improved the format. Simply looking at the number of teams , by your standard, is too myopic and ignorant.
Does it really make sense for ECNL to have 80 teams. Now you have 1100 girls playing who aren’t Power 5 level playing in the “elite” league. Doesn’t make sense.
And when I talk about exclusion, I don’t feel sorry for the girl who can’t make a roster of 20, even though her parents have the money that says she should. I’m more concerned about the girls that actually can make the roster and don’t have parents who have $5,000-$10,000 to play, they are the ones that are truly being excluded. And having 80 clubs and 1,600 spots (3,200 spots with DA and ECNL) does not solve this problem.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post40 clubs, 20 girls on a roster, 800 girls per age group. How is that not enough girls when the pool for the US Soccer ynt for each age group is like 60? That leaves room for 740 girls on the bubble. How many Power 5 teams are there? 50? Say they each take 10 new girls each year, I’m being super generous, that’s 500 girls. You still have 300 girls that aren’t even Power 5 level players playing in the “elite” league. How much more dilution do you need?
Does it really make sense for ECNL to have 80 teams. Now you have 1100 girls playing who aren’t Power 5 level playing in the “elite” league. Doesn’t make sense.
And when I talk about exclusion, I don’t feel sorry for the girl who can’t make a roster of 20, even though her parents have the money that says she should. I’m more concerned about the girls that actually can make the roster and don’t have parents who have $5,000-$10,000 to play, they are the ones that are truly being excluded. And having 80 clubs and 1,600 spots (3,200 spots with DA and ECNL) does not solve this problem.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou’re not very smart are you. Your puny numbers compared to the hundreds of thousands of players.
The only reason these platforms have weakened is because 3,200 girls in EACH age group have been given access to these leagues by paying $5,000-10,000 to play NOT because they are elite. Parents need to push back on the system and say, my kid is not being tapped by US Soccer, they aren’t even being looked at by Power 5 schools, and I’m not talking camp emails. I mean being offered at the least a 50% scholarship, maybe it’s time to leave elite leagues to the elite and stop the insanity.
As long as parents keep demanding their non-elite players to be given elite opportunities, it will happen. We have 160 clubs in “elite” ECNL/DA, if even more clubs see opportunity to make money off delusional parents that number will expand to 200 then 300. The market will expand as long as parents demand, it’s a joke. 40 clubs. That’s all that’s needed to fulfill the needs of the true elite.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe number of elite players IS puny. Just because a league, club, a DOC convinced you otherwise, the numbers don’t lie. No one is saying that the hundreds of thousands of players shouldn’t have access to soccer. They should be strengthening their local leagues, high schools, and local, regional, and national ODP.
The only reason these platforms have weakened is because 3,200 girls in EACH age group have been given access to these leagues by paying $5,000-10,000 to play NOT because they are elite. Parents need to push back on the system and say, my kid is not being tapped by US Soccer, they aren’t even being looked at by Power 5 schools, and I’m not talking camp emails. I mean being offered at the least a 50% scholarship, maybe it’s time to leave elite leagues to the elite and stop the insanity.
As long as parents keep demanding their non-elite players to be given elite opportunities, it will happen. We have 160 clubs in “elite” ECNL/DA, if even more clubs see opportunity to make money off delusional parents that number will expand to 200 then 300. The market will expand as long as parents demand, it’s a joke. 40 clubs. That’s all that’s needed to fulfill the needs of the true elite.
Hell get 1,000 clubs and give anyone who is willing to pay for it or is afforded the opportunity to play a chance. We are the biggest baddest country on the planet cause everyone has a chance to take a bite out of the apple. Don't forget our Women's teams are best in the world and will continue to be. Our men's soccer teams suck, cause as a country we do not support them. Sure hipsters and high school little fella phenoms pack the stands; but really most of us really don't care about men's soccer. Stop measuring the girls game thru this lens. Nothing broke here and we are all happiesh. Men NT suck and they are over paid.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe number of elite players IS puny. Just because a league, club, a DOC convinced you otherwise, the numbers don’t lie. No one is saying that the hundreds of thousands of players shouldn’t have access to soccer. They should be strengthening their local leagues, high schools, and local, regional, and national ODP.
The only reason these platforms have weakened is because 3,200 girls in EACH age group have been given access to these leagues by paying $5,000-10,000 to play NOT because they are elite. Parents need to push back on the system and say, my kid is not being tapped by US Soccer, they aren’t even being looked at by Power 5 schools, and I’m not talking camp emails. I mean being offered at the least a 50% scholarship, maybe it’s time to leave elite leagues to the elite and stop the insanity.
As long as parents keep demanding their non-elite players to be given elite opportunities, it will happen. We have 160 clubs in “elite” ECNL/DA, if even more clubs see opportunity to make money off delusional parents that number will expand to 200 then 300. The market will expand as long as parents demand, it’s a joke. 40 clubs. That’s all that’s needed to fulfill the needs of the true elite.
You also clearly don’t understand the purpose of ECNL, which is to provide a platform for top female players to develop and compete with college as the objective.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOh please.... you are literally making numbers up to justify your stupidity. You.... are.... wrong.
You also clearly don’t understand the purpose of ECNL, which is to provide a platform for top female players to develop and compete with college as the objective.
The people I know who have daughters that play on ECNL teams are wealthy and want the bragging rights. Their daughters are mostly above average players, but not the best players.
Kind of like putting a water feature at the entrance to your 1/4 mile driveway. You want people to know that you make serious money and are elite status. You earned the right. You deserve this. You belong to the top tier country club and wouldn't be caught dead teeing off at a public course.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe people I know who have daughters that play on ECNL teams are wealthy and want the bragging rights. Their daughters are mostly above average players, but not the best players.
Kind of like putting a water feature at the entrance to your 1/4 mile driveway. You want people to know that you make serious money and are elite status. You earned the right. You deserve this. You belong to the top tier country club and wouldn't be caught dead teeing off at a public course.
- Quote
Comment
Comment