Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
The usual suspects here (which, lets be honest, might be full of it) are alleging that SCA is a similar sort of arrangement--a for-profit business which is trying to create or associate with a registered non-profit to satisfy OYSA requirements--and the OYSA is denying their application on the grounds that they aren't really a non-profit.
Neither, kids, is ADF, if you are going to judge a club's application based on their business arrangements.
Other than a grandfather clause, why would TS's venture be told no, but JC's venture be allowed? Is there a meaningful difference in how the two operations function?
Comment